Edward Imwinkelried

Edward Imwinkelried's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings

Edward Imwinkelried

Law

#1848

World Rank

#2305

Historical Rank

#880

USA Rank

International Law

#806

World Rank

#982

Historical Rank

#359

USA Rank

law Degrees

Download Badge

Why Is Edward Imwinkelried Influential?

(Suggest an Edit or Addition)

According to Wikipedia, Edward John Imwinkelried is an American educator and law scholar. the Edward L. Barrett, Jr. Professor of Law Emeritus at the UC Davis School of Law . Imwinkelried is the most cited legal academic in the country in the area of Evidence law. His book, Scientific Evidence, was cited twice by the U.S. Supreme Court in the ground-breaking evidence case, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.

(See a Problem?)

Edward Imwinkelried's Published Works

Number of citations in a given year to any of this author's works

Total number of citations to an author for the works they published in a given year. This highlights publication of the most important work(s) by the author

Published Works

Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. (1999) (109)
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims (2016) (29)
A Cautionary Note about FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS and Reliance on DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY (2006) (23)
Council on Environmental Quality (2017) (20)
The Standard for Admitting Scientific Evidence: A Critique from the Perspective of Juror Psychology (1983) (20)
Science takes the stand (1986) (16)
A New Era in the Evolution of Scientific Evidence - A Primer on Evaluating the Weight of Scientific Evidence (1981) (14)
Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should Be the Norm? (2005) (13)
The Debate in the DNA Cases Over the Foundation for the Admission of Scientific Evidence: The Importance of Human Error as a Cause of Forensic Misanalysis (1991) (13)
Wading Into the Daubert Tide: Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California (2013) (12)
The Challenge of Bitcoin Pseudo-Anonymity to Computer Forensics (2015) (12)
The Meaning of Probative Value and Prejudice in Federal Rule of Evidence 403: Can Rule 403 Be Used to Resurrect the Common Law of Evidence? (1988) (11)
Computer Source Code: A Source of the Growing Controversy Over the Reliability of Automated Forensic Techniques (2016) (11)
The Methods of Attacking Scientific Evidence (1992) (11)
Reference Guide on Forensic Identification Expertise (2011) (10)
Evaluating the Reliability of Nonscientific Expert Testimony: A Partial Answer to the Questions Left Unresolved by Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (2000) (9)
Coming to Grips with Scientific Research in Daubert' "Brave New World": The Courts' Need to Appreciate the Evidentiary Differences between Validity and Proficiency Studies (1995) (9)
DNA Typing: Emerging or Neglected Issues (2001) (8)
The Bases of Expert Testimony: The Syllogistic Structure of Scientific Testimony (1988) (7)
Uncharged misconduct evidence (1984) (5)
Judge Versus Jury: Who Should Decide Questions of Preliminary Facts Conditioning the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence? (1984) (5)
Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis Evidence: Valid Inference or Ipse Dixit? (2003) (5)
Courtroom Criminal Evidence (1998) (5)
An Hegelian Approach to Privileges under Federal Rule of Evidence 501: The Restrictive Thesis, the Expansive Antithesis, and the Contextual Synthesis (1994) (4)
The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis as to the Logical Structure of Evidence Law (1992) (4)
Questioning the Behavioral Assumption Underlying Wigmorean Absolutism in the Law of Evidentiary Privileges (2003) (4)
Whether the Federal Rules of Evidence Should be Conceived as a Perpetual Index Code: Blindness Is Worse Than Myopia (1999) (4)
Forensic Hair Analysis: The Case Against The Underemployment Of Scientific Evidence (1982) (4)
Shaken Baby Syndrome: A Genuine Battle of the Scientific (and Non-Scientific) Experts (2009) (4)
How We Can Improve the Reliability of Fingerprint Identification (2006) (4)
The Best Insurance against Miscarriages of Justice Caused by Junk Science: An Admissibility Test That Is Scientifically and Legally Sound (2017) (4)
A comparative law analysis of the standard for admitting scientific evidence: The united states stands alone (1989) (3)
A Brief Defense of the Supreme Court's Approach to the Interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence (1993) (3)
The Next Step in Conceptualizing the Presentation of Expert Evidence as Education: The Case for Didactic Trial Procedures (1997) (3)
The Need to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): The Threat to the Future of the Federal Rules of Evidence (1985) (3)
Serendipitous Timing: The Coincidental Emergence of the New Brain Science and the Advent of an Epistemological Approach to Determining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony (2010) (3)
The Evolution of the American Test for the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence (1990) (3)
The Application of the Attorney-Client Privilege to Non-Testifying Experts: Reestablishing the Boundaries Between the Attorney-Client Privilege and the Work Product Protection (1990) (3)
Undertaking the Task of Reforming the American Character Evidence Prohibition: The Importance of Getting the Experiment Off on the Right Foot (1995) (3)
The Use of Evidence of an Accused's Uncharged Misconduct to Prove Mens Rea: The Doctrines Which Threaten to Engulf the Character Evidence Prohibition (1990) (3)
Cyberspace: The Newest Challenge for Traditional Legal Doctrine (1998) (3)
Scientific Evidence: The Fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Kumho Tires (2000) (3)
Microbial Forensics: The Biggest Thing Since DNA? (2015) (3)
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS): In Scientific Evidence, Even 'Gold Standard' Techniques Have Limitations (2018) (3)
An Evidentiary Paradox: Defending the Character Evidence Prohibition by Upholding a Non-Character Theory of Logical Relevance, the Doctrine of Chances (2005) (3)
A Comparativist Critique of the Interface Between Hearsay and Expert Opinion in American Evidence Law (1991) (2)
Should the Courts Incorporate a Best Evidence Rule into the Standard Determining the Admissibility of Scientific Testimony: Enough is Enough Even When It Is Not the Best (1999) (2)
Trial Judges: Gatekeepers or Usurpers? Can the Trial Judge Critically Assess the Admissibility of Expert Testimony Without Invading the Jury's Province to Evaluate the Credibility and Weight of the Testimony? (2000) (2)
Minnesota v. Philip Morris, Inc.: An Important Legal Ethics Message Which Neglects the Public Interest in Product Safety Research (1999) (2)
The court appointment of expert witnesses in the United States: a failed experiment. (1989) (2)
Modern Litigation and Professional Responsibility Handbook: The Limits of Zealous Advocacy (1995) (2)
The Relativity of Reliability (2004) (2)
The Implied Obligation of Good Faith in Contract Law: Is it Time to Write its Obituary? (2009) (2)
Peer Dialogue: The How and What of Appropriate Validation under Daubert: Reconsidering the Treatment of Einstein and Freud (2003) (2)
The Worst Surprise of All: No Right to Pretrial Discovery of the Prosecution's Uncharged Misconduct Evidence (1987) (1)
The Rivalry between Truth and Privilege: The Weakness of the Supreme Court's Instrumental Reasoning in Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996) (1998) (1)
Forensic Metrology: The New Honesty about the Uncertainty of Measurements in Scientific Analysis (2012) (1)
Impoverishing the Trier of Fact: Excluding the Proponent's Expert Testimony Due to the Opponent's Inability to Afford Rebuttal Evidence (2007) (1)
EXPERT WITNESS | Daubert and Beyond (2005) (1)
Another "View" of Fingerprint Evidence (2011) (1)
Can we rely on the alleged constitutional right to informational privacy to secure genetic privacy in the courtroom? (2001) (1)
Rethinking the Limits of the Interpretive Maxim of Constitutional Avoidance: The Case Study of the Corroboration Requirement for Inculpatory Declarations Against Penal Interest (Federal Rule of Evidence 804(B)(3)) (2008) (1)
Jackson v. Virginia: Reopening the Pandora's Box of the Legal Sufficiency of Drug Identification Evidence (1984) (1)
The implementation of Community law : studies in the legislative and administrative policies of the European Community and its member states (2016) (1)
Pretrial discovery : the development of professional judgment (1993) (1)
Exculpatory Evidence: The Accused's Constitutional Right to Introduce Favorable Evidence (2015) (1)
Poetic Justice in Punishing the Evidentiary Misdeed of Knowingly Proffering Inadmissible Evidence (2009) (1)
The neglected intermediate premise in the forensic expert's testimony. (1992) (1)
The Case Against Abandoning the Search for Substantive Accuracy (2007) (1)
Evidence Pedagogy in the Age of Statutes. (1991) (1)
Criminal Evidentiary Foundations (1997) (1)
Reshaping the 'Grotesque' Doctrine of Character Evidence: The Reform Implications of the Most Recent Psychological Research (2006) (1)
The Constitutionality of Introducing Evaluative Laboratory Reports against Criminal Defendants (1979) (1)
The Alienability of Evidentiary Privileges: Of Property and Evidence, Burden and Benefit, Hearsay and Privilege (2012) (1)
The Meaning of "Appropriate Validation" in Daubert - Interpreted in Light of the Broader Rationalist Tradition, not the Narrow Scientific Tradition (2003) (1)
Cell Tower Junk Science (2012) (1)
The Evolution of the Use of the Doctrine of Chances as Theory of Admissibility for Similar Fact Evidence (1993) (1)
Fundamental social rights: case law of the European Social Charter (2016) (1)
Didactic Trial Procedures (1998) (1)
The Golden Anniversary of the 'Preliminary Study of the Advisability and Feasibility of Developing Uniform Rules of Evidence for the Federal Courts': Mission Accomplished? (2011) (1)
Criminal Minds: The Need to Refine the Application of the Doctrine of Objective Chances as a Justification for Introducing Uncharged Misconduct Evidence to Prove Intent (2016) (1)
Materials for the study of evidence : cases and materials (1986) (1)
The Second Coming of Res Gestae: A Procedural Approach to Untangling the 'Inextricably Intertwined' Theory for Admitting Evidence of an Accused’s Uncharged Misconduct (2009) (1)
Some preliminary thoughts on the wisdom of governmental prohibition or regulation of private employee urinalysis testing. (1987) (1)
FALSE POSITIVE: SHODDY DRUG TESTING IS JEOPARDIZING THE JOBS OF MILLIONS (1987) (1)
The Application of the Attorney-Client Privilege to Interactions Among Clients, Attorneys, and Experts in the Age of Consultants: The Need for a More Precise, Fundamental Analysis (2010) (1)
Some Comments about Mr. David Karp's Remarks on Propensity Evidence (1994) (1)
The End of the Era of Proxies (2011) (0)
Evidence of a Third Party's Guilt of the Crime that the Accused is Charged with: The Constitutionalization of the SODDI (Some Other Dude Did It) Defense 2.0 (2014) (0)
The Epistemological Trend in the Evolution of the Law of Expert Testimony: A Scrutiny at Once Broader, Narrower, and Deeper (2012) (0)
Review of I.H. Dennis, The Law of Evidence (1999) (2001) (0)
The Effect of the Successful Assertion of the State Secrets Privilege in a Civil Lawsuit in Which the Government Is Not a Party: When, If Ever, Should the Defendant Shoulder the Burden of the Government’s Successful Privilege Claim? (2015) (0)
Preliminary Thoughts on an Attorney-Client Privilege For Law Firms: When a Current Client Threatens to Sue the Firm for Malpractice, Does the Privilege Apply to the Firm's Consultation with In-House Counsel About the Potential Claim? (2013) (0)
The Development of Professional Judgment in Law School Litigation Courses: The Concepts of Trial Theory and Theme (2020) (0)
A New Antidote for an Opponent's Pretrial Discovery Misconduct: Treating the Misconduct at Trial as an Admission by Conduct of the Weakness of the Opponent's Case (1993) (0)
California evidentiary foundations (1988) (0)
Employment Law Conference, 20th August, 2007 (2017) (0)
'This is Like Deja Vu All Over Again': The Third, Constitutional Attack on the Admissibility of Police Laboratory Reports in Criminal Cases (2008) (0)
Introduction to the Evidence Symposium: The New Generation of Realists in Evidence Law (2001) (0)
People v. Ewoldt: The California Supreme Court's About-Face on the Plan Theory for Admitting Evidence of an Accused's Uncharged Misconduct (1995) (0)
McCormick's Evidence, 7th (Hornbook Series) (2014) (0)
The Need to Resurrect the Present Sense Impression Hearsay Exception: A Relapse in Hearsay Policy (2008) (0)
New York Evidentiary Foundations (1998) (0)
Internet Theft Is Avoidable (2008) (0)
The Theory of "Unconscious Transference": The Latest Threat to the Shield Laws Protecting the Privacy of Victims of Sex Offenses (1997) (0)
Rationalization and Limitation: The Use of Learned Treatises to Impeach Opposing Witnesses (2011) (0)
A Brief Essay Defending the Doctrine of Objective Chances as a Valid Theory for Introducing Evidence of an Accused's Uncharged Misconduct (2019) (0)
Distinguishing Lay from Expert Opinion: The Need to Focus on the Epistemological Differences between the Reasoning Processes Used by Lay and Expert Witnesses (2014) (0)
'Importing' Restrictions from One Federal Rule of Evidence Provision to Another: The Limits of Legitimate Contextual Interpretation in the Age of Statutes (2019) (0)
Plan Theory for Admitting Evidence of the Defendant's Uncharged Crimes: A Microcosm of the Flaws in the Uncharged Misconduct Doctrine, The (1985) (0)
The Scope of the Residual Hearsay Exceptions in the Federal Rules of Evidence (2019) (0)
Keeping the Reformist Spirit Alive in Evidence Law Tribute (2000) (0)
The Government Misconduct Exception to the Deliberative Process Privilege: Bringing Clarity to the Most Important Exception to the Most Frequently Invoked Government Evidentiary Privilege (2020) (0)
The Dangerous Trend Blurring the Distinction between a Reasonable Expectation of Confidentiality in Privilege Law and a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence (2010) (0)
The Case for the Present Sense Impression Hearsay Exception: The Relevance of the Original Version of Federal Rule of Evidence 8-03 to Judge Posner’s Criticism of the Exception (2015) (0)
Forensic DNA Typing, Selected Legal Issues: A Report to the Working Group on Legal Issues, National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence (2001) (0)
The Applicability of Privileges to Employees’ Personal E-Mails: The Errors Caused by the Confusion between Privilege Confidentiality and Other Notions of Privacy (2013) (0)
Brief of Amici Curiae Evidence Law Professors in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and Supporting Reversal in Wikimedia v. NSA (2020) (0)
The Lack of Statistics and Distortion Can Weaken Fingerprint Accuracy (2010) (0)
The Legal Sufficiency Analysis of Genuine Battles of the Experts in Criminal Trials: The Unrealized Potential of the Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Jackson v. Virginia (2018) (0)
Virginia State Bar Association (2016) (0)
Protecting the Attorney-Client Privilege in Business Negotiations: Would the Application of the Subject-Matter Waiver Doctrine Really Drive Attorneys from the Bargaining Table? (2012) (0)
Selected rules of limited admissibility . Evidentiary privileges (2003) (0)
Traffic and minor offences legislation South Australia: Butterworths Annotated Acts (2017) (0)
A Brief Comment on the Response By Professors Findley and Risinger to My Original Contribution to Professor Risinger’s Symposium (2018) (0)
Before We Move on to Another Topic: The Narrow Issue of Knowingly Proffering Inadmissible Evidence (2009) (0)
Scientific and expert evidence : formerly Scientific and expert evidence in criminal advocacy (1981) (0)
Evidence Code Section 802: The Neglected Key to Rationalizing the California Law of Expert Testimony (2009) (0)
Evidentiary Tactics: Selecting the “Best” Evidence to Simplify the Case (2004) (0)
A Psychological Critique of the Assumptions Underlying the Law of Evidentiary Privileges: Insights from the Literature on Self-Disclosure (2004) (0)
Regulating expert evidence in US courts: measuring Daubert’s impact (2018) (0)
The Validity of the 2010 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 Amendment Governing the Waiver of Work Product Protection: Is the Work Product Doctrine an Evidentiary Privilege? (2011) (0)
Formalism versus Pragmatism in Evidence: Reconsidering the Absolute Ban on the Use of Extrinsic Evidence to Prove Impeaching, Untruthful Acts that Have Not Resulted in a Conviction (2014) (0)
Clarifying the Curative Admissibility Doctrine: Using the Principles of Forfeiture and Deterrence to Shape the Relief for an Opponent's Evidentiary Misconduct (2007) (0)
Georgia Law Review Symposium 2013 (2013) (0)
Developing a Coherent Theory of the Structure of Federal Rule of Evidence 703 (2020) (0)
Science in the Courtroom Panel (2013) (0)
The Causation Issue in Computer Security Breach Cases (2009) (0)
Draft Article V of the Federal Rules of Evidence on Privileges, One of the Most Influential Pieces of Legislation Never Enacted: The Strength of the Ingroup Loyalty of the Federal Judiciary (2006) (0)
My (Initial) Impressions of David Leonard (2010) (0)
Forensic Science: Measurements in Forensic Science – Of Errors and Uncertainty (2017) (0)
THE FORM OF REFORM: REVISITING THE CHOICE AMONG A CREED, A CODE, AND A CATALOGUE (2018) (0)
Contract Lawsuits: Trial Strategies and Techniques (1989) (0)
The Ambivalence in the American Law Governing the Admissibility of Uncharged Misconduct Evidence (2015) (0)
Constitutional Rights and Military Necessity: Reflections on the Society Apart (1976) (0)
Florida Evidentiary Foundations (2001) (0)
FIRST-YEAR COURSES SECOND-AND THIRD-YEAR COURSES (0)
A more Modest Proposal than 'A Common Law for the Age of Statutes': Greater Reliance in Statutory Interpretation on the Concept of Interpretative Intention (2005) (0)
Revising State Post-Conviction Relief Statutes to Cover Convictions Resting on Subsequently Invalidated Expert Testimony (2017) (0)
The Need for Truly Systemic Analysis of Proposals for the Reform of Both Pretrial Practice and Evidentiary Rules: The Role of the Law of Unintended Consequences in 'Litigation' Reform (2012) (0)
The Unconstitutional Burden of Article 15: A Rebuttal (1974) (0)
Tribute to Professor Paul Giannelli (2018) (0)
The Gordian Knot of the Treatment of Secondhand Facts Under Federal Rule of Evidence 703 Governing the Admissibility of Expert Opinions: Another Conflict between Logic and Law (2012) (0)
An evidence anthology (1996) (0)
Dynamics of Trial Practice, Problems and Materials (2020) (0)
Professor Margaret Berger, the Epitome of the Fully Engaged Scholar and Friend of the Court (2010) (0)
Should Rape Shield Laws Bar Proof that the Alleged Victim Has Made Similar, False Rape Accusations in the Past?: Fair Symmetry With the Rape Sword Laws (2017) (0)
The Meaning of "Facts or Data" in Federal Rule of Evidence 703: the Significance of the Supreme Court's Decision to Rely on Federal Rule 702 in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1995) (0)
On Achieving Synergy in the Law School Curriculum (2014) (0)
The Daubert Decision on the Admissability of Scientific Evidence: The Supreme Court Chooses the Right Piece for All the Evidentiary Puzzles (2012) (0)
Pretrial discovery : strategy & tactics (2006) (0)
Reply Essay: A Final Comment--The Importance of the Procedural Framework (2000) (0)
A Statute Overtaken by Time: The Need to Re-Interpret Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(a)(iii) Governing the Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Government Investigative Reports (2014) (0)
McCormick on Evidence, 7th (Practitioner Treatise Series) (2013) (0)
Sargon Enterprises V. U.S.C. - A Different Perspective (2014) (0)
'Waiver' Raised to the Second Power: Waivers of Evidentiary Privileges by Lawyers Representing Accused Being Tried in Absentia (2005) (0)
Prejudice to the N th Degree: The Introduction of Uncharged Misconduct Admissible Only Against a Co-Defendant at a Megatrial (2000) (0)
Should Rape Shield Laws Bar Proof that the Alleged Victim Has Made Similar, Untruthful Rape Accusations in the Past?: Fair Symmetry with the Rape Sword Laws (2016) (0)
The Government's Increasing Reliance on — And Abuse of — The Deliberative Process Evidentiary Privilege: '[T]he Last Will Be First' (2013) (0)
The Danger of Exposure to the Internet (2007) (0)
The Admissibility of Prosecution Evidence that the Defense Had the Opportunity to Retest the Physical Evidence that Was Analyzed by a Government Expert (2010) (0)

This paper list is powered by the following services:

Other Resources About Edward Imwinkelried

en.wikipedia.org

What Schools Are Affiliated With Edward Imwinkelried?

Edward Imwinkelried is affiliated with the following schools: