Fiona Fidler
#169,118
Most Influential Person Now
Australian researcher of psychology of decision making
Fiona Fidler's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings
Download Badge
Psychology
Fiona Fidler's Degrees
- Bachelors Psychology University of Melbourne
- PhD Psychology University of Melbourne
Similar Degrees You Can Earn
Why Is Fiona Fidler Influential?
(Suggest an Edit or Addition)According to Wikipedia, Fiona Fidler is an Australian professor and lecturer with interests in meta-research, reproducibility, open science, reasoning and decision making and statistical practice. She has held research positions at several universities and across disciplines in conjunction with Australian Research Council Centres of Excellence.
Fiona Fidler's Published Works
Published Works
- Redefine statistical significance (2017) (1806)
- Error bars in experimental biology (2007) (839)
- Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science (2012) (641)
- Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. (2005) (305)
- Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts (2010) (287)
- Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them Think (2004) (243)
- Expert Status and Performance (2011) (237)
- Replication and Researchers' Understanding of Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars. (2004) (168)
- Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution (2018) (160)
- Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions. (2016) (134)
- Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology (2006) (129)
- Replicates and repeats—what is the difference and is it significant? (2012) (121)
- Computing Correct Confidence Intervals for Anova Fixed-and Random-Effects Effect Sizes (2001) (116)
- PERSPECTIVE - Researchers Should Make Thoughtful Assessments Instead of Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests (2011) (112)
- The Fifth edition of the Apa Publication Manual: Why its Statistics Recommendations are so Controversial (2002) (103)
- Confidence Intervals Permit, but Do Not Guarantee, Better Inference than Statistical Significance Testing (2010) (102)
- Statistical reform in medicine, psychology and ecology (2004) (101)
- Statistical Reform in Psychology (2007) (96)
- Confidence intervals : better answers to better questions. (2009) (88)
- The statistical recommendations of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta‐analysis (2012) (87)
- Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature (2019) (86)
- Reproducibility of Scientific Results (2018) (83)
- Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management (2018) (78)
- Why Figures with Error Bars Should Replace p Values Some Conceptual Arguments and Empirical Demonstrations (2015) (73)
- Toward improved statistical reporting in the journal of consulting and clinical psychology. (2005) (70)
- Five lessons to guide more effective biodiversity conservation message framing (2020) (64)
- Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science. (2021) (62)
- I nvestigate D iscuss E stimate A ggregate for structured expert judgement (2017) (61)
- Evaluating the accuracy and calibration of expert predictions under uncertainty: predicting the outcomes of ecological research (2012) (60)
- Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution (2017) (55)
- STATISTICAL COGNITION: TOWARDS EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN STATISTICS AND STATISTICS EDUCATION (2008) (44)
- Interpreting Significance: The Differences Between Statistical Significance, Effect Size, and Practical Importance (2010) (44)
- The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysis. (2008) (43)
- Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2020) (41)
- Decision Making in a Human Population Living Sustainably (2012) (39)
- Framing the private land conservation conversation: Strategic framing of the benefits of conservation participation could increase landholder engagement (2016) (36)
- Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers (2019) (36)
- Improving visual estimation through active feedback (2013) (35)
- Revisiting the promise of conservation psychology (2018) (34)
- The perception of positive and negative facial expressions in unilateral brain-damaged patients: A meta-analysis (2013) (32)
- The role of replication studies in ecology (2019) (30)
- Beyond Advocacy: Making Space for Conservation Scientists in Public Debate (2016) (29)
- From Statistical Significance to Effect Estimation: Statistical Reform in Psychology, Medicine and Ecology (2018) (28)
- Teaching Confidence Intervals: Problems and Potential Solutions (2005) (27)
- Use of confidence intervals to demonstrate performance against forest management standards (2007) (27)
- Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology (2021) (27)
- InvestigateDiscussEstimateAggregate for structured expert judgement (2016) (26)
- Subjective p intervals researchers underestimate the variability of p values over replication (2012) (24)
- SHOULD PSYCHOLOGY ABANDON p VALUES AND TEACH CIs INSTEAD? EVIDENCE-BASED REFORMS IN STATISICS EDUCATION (2006) (23)
- Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency (2018) (23)
- Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE) (2021) (23)
- Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review (2020) (22)
- Interval estimates for statistical communication: problems and possible solutions (2005) (20)
- QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: AN ESSENTIAL PART OF STATISTICAL COGNITION RESEARCH (2010) (20)
- Minimising biases in expert elicitations to inform environmental management: Case studies from environmental flows in Australia (2018) (18)
- The Epistemic Importance of Establishing the Absence of an Effect (2018) (14)
- Effect Size Estimation and Confidence Intervals (2012) (13)
- The Intelligence Game: Assessing Delphi Groups and structured question formats (2012) (13)
- Still Much to Learn About Confidence Intervals (2005) (13)
- The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence (2021) (13)
- The American Psychological Association Publication Manual Sixth Edition : Implications For Statistics Education (2010) (13)
- Lessons learned from statistical reform efforts in other disciplines (2007) (13)
- Decline of 'biodiversity' in conservation policy discourse in Australia - Supplementary information (2017) (12)
- Overcoming the Inverse Probability Fallacy A Comparison of Two Teaching Interventions (2008) (12)
- We have a steak in it: Eliciting interventions to reduce beef consumption and its impact on biodiversity (2020) (11)
- The New Stats Attitudes for the 21st Century (2008) (10)
- Punching above their weight: the ecological and social benefits of pop‐up parks (2019) (9)
- Sex and power: Why sex/gender neuroscience should motivate statistical reform (2015) (7)
- A review of data and code sharing rates in medical and health research (2021) (7)
- Replication unreliability in psychology: elusive phenomena or "elusive" statistical power? (2012) (7)
- Eliciting expert judgement 2 ACERA Project 0611 Eliciting Expert Judgments Report # 1 : Literature Review (2007) (7)
- Australian and Italian Psychologists’ View of Replication (2020) (7)
- Statistical significance, result worthiness and evidence: What lessons are there for giftedness education in other disciplines? (2010) (6)
- Mathematically aggregating experts’ predictions of possible futures (2021) (6)
- 15. Analyzing and presenting outcomes (2008) (6)
- Improving the transparency of statistical reporting in Conservation Letters (2018) (5)
- Ethics and Statistical Reform: Lessons From Medicine (2011) (5)
- Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) (2021) (4)
- From Hypothesis Testing to Parameter Estimation: An Example of Evidence-Based Practice in Statistics (2011) (4)
- The New Stats: Attitudes for the Twenty-First Century (2008) (4)
- Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups (2021) (4)
- How fast should nanotechnology advance? (2007) (4)
- THE STATISTICAL RE-EDUCATION OF PSYCHOLOGY (2002) (4)
- Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. (2021) (3)
- Yes, but Don’t Underestimate Estimation (2014) (3)
- Judgement Swapping and Aggregation (2012) (3)
- Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process (2022) (3)
- Reproducibility Project (2017) (2)
- Better Answers to Better Questions (2009) (2)
- Better Together: Reliable Application of the Post-9/11 and Post-Iraq US Intelligence Tradecraft Standards Requires Collective Analysis (2019) (2)
- Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals (2018) (1)
- Fraud Not a Primary Cause of Irreproducible Results: A Reply to Clark et al. (2016) (1)
- Database of Articles with Open Science Badges (2018) (1)
- A toolkit for open and pluralistic conservation science (2022) (1)
- Evolutionary Ecology Data (2020) (1)
- Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology (2021) (1)
- Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] (2021) (1)
- Eliciting group judgements about replicability: a technical implementation of the IDEA Protocol (2021) (1)
- NSF 19-501 AccelNet Proposal: Community of Open Scholarship Grassroots Networks (COSGN) (2020) (1)
- Getting Started with Preregistration Workshop (2017) (0)
- Mathematically aggregating experts' predictions of possible futures (2021) (0)
- Plain English for Risk Communication (2009) (0)
- Statistical Procedures to Assess and Present Outcome (2008) (0)
- UQ Open Science Conference 2018 (2018) (0)
- Statistical reform in psychology: Has anything changed in recent years (2006) (0)
- Workshop - RepliCATS: Evaluating the replicability of social and behavioural science claims (2019) (0)
- Creating (and mapping) the history of scientific reform (2019) (0)
- Publically Available Materials (2018) (0)
- The Meaning of Replications: Competing Perspectives (2017) (0)
- Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations] (2021) (0)
- Anchoring effects on likelihood estimates (2017) (0)
- Developing, Validating, and Obtaining Stakeholder Buy-In for Criteria for Applying Social Science to Policymaking (2018) (0)
- How well are confidence intervals understood? The bad, the good and how to make the pictures less ugly (2004) (0)
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality (2022) (0)
- Replicating Decision Support Systems (2018) (0)
- Assessment of effect size inflation / publication bias in psychological research (2018) (0)
- EFFECT SIZES AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS : HOW COMPLETE ARE PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS OF RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY ? (2010) (0)
- Error Bias Survey (2017) (0)
- Final Feedback for Participants (2018) (0)
- SWARM Google Docs documents (2018) (0)
- Overview of the Reproducibility Crisis (2017) (0)
- Understanding Uptake of Decision-Support Models in Conservation and Natural Resource Management (2017) (0)
- Redefine statistical significance (2017) (0)
- Ecology and Conservation Data (2020) (0)
- Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] (2021) (0)
- Fake News Project (2018) (0)
- Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency (2018) (0)
- Why medicine uses confidence intervals, but psychology and ecology don't yet (2004) (0)
- Australia / New Zealand Open Research Network (ORN) (2018) (0)
- Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process (2022) (0)
- Empowering peer reviewers to improve transparency (2018) (0)
- Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] (2021) (0)
- Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. (2021) (0)
- Resources for Discussing Racism within the Sciences (2020) (0)
- Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process (2023) (0)
- Workshop - Voicing values about statistical decisions (2019) (0)
- repliCATS participant materials (2019) (0)
- 1 Title : Redefine Statistical Significance (2017) (0)
- Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology [Registered Report Stage 1 Protocol] (2020) (0)
- Fraud, bias, negligence and hype in the lab — a rogues’ gallery (2020) (0)
- Many EcoEvo Analysts (2018) (0)
This paper list is powered by the following services:
Other Resources About Fiona Fidler
What Schools Are Affiliated With Fiona Fidler?
Fiona Fidler is affiliated with the following schools: