Jelte Wicherts
#39,841
Most Influential Person Now
Researcher
Jelte Wicherts's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings
Jelte Wichertspsychology Degrees
Psychology
#3013
World Rank
#3445
Historical Rank
Psychometrics
#26
World Rank
#29
Historical Rank
Jelte Wichertsmathematics Degrees
Mathematics
#7611
World Rank
#10319
Historical Rank
Statistics
#914
World Rank
#1007
Historical Rank
Measure Theory
#2546
World Rank
#3054
Historical Rank
Download Badge
Psychology Mathematics
Jelte Wicherts's Degrees
- PhD Psychology University of Amsterdam
- Masters Psychology University of Amsterdam
- Bachelors Psychology University of Amsterdam
Similar Degrees You Can Earn
Why Is Jelte Wicherts Influential?
(Suggest an Edit or Addition)According to Wikipedia, Jelte Michiel "J.M." Wicherts is a Dutch psychologist and professor in the Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences at Tilburg University. His research interests include biases in decision making, as well as scientific misconduct and reproducibility. He has also researched group differences in IQ scores and the Flynn effect.
Jelte Wicherts's Published Works
Number of citations in a given year to any of this author's works
Total number of citations to an author for the works they published in a given year. This highlights publication of the most important work(s) by the author
Published Works
- A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. (2006) (720)
- Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology † (2013) (698)
- The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science (2012) (645)
- Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016) (410)
- The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. (2006) (386)
- The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies (2015) (332)
- The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015) (303)
- Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results (2011) (300)
- Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. (2015) (281)
- The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals (2011) (278)
- Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019) (263)
- Meta-analysis of psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood abuse. (2014) (248)
- Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean? (2015) (229)
- Remission from post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcome studies. (2014) (227)
- Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks (2014) (218)
- Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect (2004) (205)
- Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies. (2015) (190)
- Women's Scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): Gender Similarities and Differences (2008) (137)
- Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: a question of measurement invariance. (2005) (130)
- Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values (2016) (130)
- Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis (2019) (123)
- Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals (2016) (115)
- Measurement invariance in confirmatory factor analysis: an illustration using IQ test performance of minorities (2010) (113)
- A systematic literature review of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans (2010) (113)
- Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the Type I error rate in independent samples t tests: the power of alternatives and recommendations. (2014) (112)
- A cognitive and an affective dimension of alexithymia in six languages and seven populations (2007) (109)
- Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results (2014) (102)
- Researchers’ Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research (2016) (101)
- Raven’s test performance of sub-Saharan Africans: average performance, psychometric properties, and the Flynn Effect (2010) (97)
- Modeling differentiation of cognitive abilities within the higher-order factor model using moderated factor analysis (2010) (91)
- Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists (2017) (80)
- Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too? (2012) (78)
- Computer Anxiety: "Trait" or "State"? (2007) (76)
- On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage (2015) (74)
- On the Nature and Nurture of Intelligence and Specific Cognitive Abilities (2013) (72)
- Multi-group covariance and mean structure modeling of the relationship between the WAIS-III common factors and sex and educational attainment in Spain (2006) (70)
- Cohort differences in Big Five personality factors over a period of 25 years. (2011) (70)
- A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019) (69)
- Mind the Gap: A Psychometric Approach to the Reduction Problem (2011) (65)
- Intelligence and the brain: A model-based approach (2012) (64)
- Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case (2011) (64)
- Why national IQs do not support evolutionary theories of intelligence (2010) (63)
- Testing Measurement Invariance in the Target Rotated Multigroup Exploratory Factor Model (2009) (62)
- Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016) (62)
- Assessing Cognitive and Behavioral Coping Strategies in Children (2009) (62)
- Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: is fair selection possible? (2008) (59)
- Two failures of Spearman's hypothesis: The GATB in Holland and the JAT in South Africa (2004) (56)
- The influence of gender stereotype threat on mathematics test scores of Dutch high school students: a registered report (2018) (55)
- Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science (2012) (55)
- Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2021) (54)
- Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science (2014) (54)
- The sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales - short form (SIS/SES-SF) (2010) (53)
- Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research (2014) (53)
- The Replication Paradox: Combining Studies can Decrease Accuracy of Effect Size Estimates (2015) (52)
- A Cautionary Note on the Use of Information Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Modeling With Means (2004) (50)
- Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on? (2016) (46)
- The importance of measurement invariance in neurocognitive ability testing (2016) (44)
- Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations (2018) (44)
- Journal Data Sharing Policies and Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies in Psychology (2017) (43)
- Burnout development among dentists: a longitudinal study. (2008) (42)
- Another failure to replicate Lynn’s estimate of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans (2010) (36)
- What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect (2008) (36)
- Group differences in the heritability of items and test scores (2009) (35)
- Preprint of Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited (2016) (35)
- Comment on “Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function” (2013) (34)
- The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them) (2017) (33)
- Bilingual education, metalinguistic awareness, and the understanding of an unknown language* (2010) (33)
- Stereotype threat research and the assumptions underlying analysis of covariance. (2005) (33)
- Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology (2019) (30)
- A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Money Priming (2019) (29)
- Science revolves around the data (2013) (28)
- Test Anxiety and the Validity of Cognitive Tests: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Perspective and Some Empirical Findings. (2010) (27)
- Perspectives on Open Science and Scientific Data Sharing: An Interdisciplinary Workshop (2014) (27)
- The dangers of unsystematic selection methods and the representativeness of 46 samples of African test-takers (2010) (27)
- Modeling Interactions Between Latent Variables in Research on Type D Personality: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Clinical Study of Depression and Anxiety (2019) (26)
- Group differences in intelligence test performance (2002) (25)
- Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research cannot be integrated the way Kanazawa (2010) suggested. (2011) (24)
- Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game (2018) (23)
- Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size. (2020) (22)
- Evolution, brain size, and the national IQ of peoples around 3000 years B.C (2010) (21)
- No Effect of Weight on Judgments of Importance in the Moral Domain and Evidence of Publication Bias from a Meta-Analysis (2015) (20)
- The impact of papers published in Intelligence 1977–2007 and an overview of the citation classics☆ (2009) (19)
- Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist? (2016) (19)
- Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales—Short Form (2010) (18)
- Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis (2020) (18)
- The Multigroup Common Factor Model With Minimal Uniqueness Constraints and the Power to Detect Uniform Bias (2006) (18)
- What is the national g-factor (2007) (17)
- Modeling Mind and Matter: Reductionism and Psychological Measurement in Cognitive Neuroscience (2011) (17)
- Broken windows, mediocre methods, and substandard statistics (2014) (17)
- The relation between specialty choice of psychology students and their interests, personality, and cognitive abilities (2010) (17)
- The Validity of the Tool “statcheck” in Discovering Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies (2017) (17)
- The Effectiveness of Psychosocial and Behavioral Interventions for Informal Dementia Caregivers: Meta-Analyses and Meta-Regressions. (2018) (16)
- Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology (2016) (16)
- Psychometric problems with the method of correlated vectors applied to item scores (including some nonsensical results) (2017) (15)
- The power to detect sex differences in IQ test scores using Multi-Group Covariance and Means Structure Analyses (2009) (14)
- Solving the 432 pieces of the puzzle called measurement invariance [Review of: R.E. Millsap (2011) Statistical approaches to measurement invariance] (2011) (13)
- Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating (2018) (13)
- The absence of underprediction does not imply the absence of measurement bias. (2009) (11)
- Computer anxiety in daily life: Old history? (2012) (11)
- Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size (2019) (10)
- Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies (2021) (10)
- Replication is more than hitting the lottery twice (2013) (9)
- The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication (2016) (8)
- A Note on the Relationship Between the Number of Indicators and Their Reliability in Detecting Regression Coefficients in Latent Regression Analysis (2004) (8)
- Times are changing, bias isn't: A meta-meta-analysis on publication bias detection practices, prevalence rates, and predictors in industrial/organizational psychology. (2021) (8)
- Research practices and assessment of research misconduct (2016) (7)
- Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands (2022) (7)
- A systematic review comparing two popular methods to assess a Type D personality effect. (2021) (6)
- Temporal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of Cyberball Studies. (2013) (6)
- Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity (2016) (6)
- Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating : A commentary on “Making replication mainstream” by Rolf A. Zwaan, Alexander Etz, Richard E. Lucas, & M. Brent Donnellan (2018) (6)
- Latent Logistic Interaction Modeling: A Simulation and Empirical Illustration of Type D Personality (2020) (6)
- Research fraud: Speed up reviews of misconduct (2012) (6)
- IGNORING PSYCHOMETRIC PROBLEMS IN THE STUDY OF GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE TEST PERFORMANCE. (2018) (5)
- Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research (2014) (5)
- How do academics assess the results of multiple experiments? (2018) (5)
- Prevalence of responsible research practices and their potential explanatory factors: a survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2021) (5)
- The poor availability of syntaxes of structural equation modeling (2017) (4)
- Detection of data fabrication using statistical tools (2019) (3)
- Preprint - Meta-Analyzing the Multiverse: A Peek Under the Hood of Selective Reporting (2021) (3)
- The Growth of Psychology and its Corrective Mechanisms: A Bibliometric Analysis (1950-2015) (2015) (2)
- Type D Personality as a Risk Factor for Adverse Outcome in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Patient-Data Meta-analysis (2021) (2)
- Assessing the temporal stability of psychological constructs: An illustration of Type D personality, anxiety and depression (2022) (2)
- Causality : Populations, individuals, and assumptions (2012) (2)
- Sharing: guidelines go one step forwards, two steps back (2009) (2)
- Data reanalysis and open data. (2017) (2)
- Distinguishing Specific from General Effects in Cognition Research (2019) (2)
- Interesting volume on emotional intelligence, whatever it is. (2008) (1)
- The Meta-Plot (2023) (1)
- The uniformity of stereotype threat: Analyzing the moderating effects of premeasured performance (2021) (1)
- Type D personality predicts the occurrence of major cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease: A multi-method analysis (2019) (1)
- The Replication Paradox (2014) (1)
- What next for scientific communication? A large scale survey of psychologists on problems and potential solutions. (2014) (1)
- A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019) (1)
- Approach, avoidance, and affect (2018) (1)
- Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity (2016) (1)
- Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity (2016) (1)
- The storybook image of the scientist (2014) (1)
- No effect of weight on judgments and perceptions of importance in the moral domain (2014) (1)
- Postprint - Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size (2020) (1)
- Tilburg University Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and Its association with effect size Olsson-Collentine, (2020) (0)
- Rule out conflicts of interest in psychology awards (2019) (0)
- Corrigendum to “The relation between specialty choice of psychology students and their interests, personality, and cognitive abilities” [Learning and Individual Differences 20 (2010) 494–500] (2012) (0)
- Stereotype Threat and Differential Item (2013) (0)
- Rules of the game (2016) (0)
- Culture Dependent On the Nature and Nurture of Intelligence and Specific Cognitive Abilities : The More Heritable , the More-Dec 13 (2013) (0)
- Author Correction: A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019) (0)
- Meta-analysis Stereotype Threat for Children and Adolescents (2013) (0)
- Supplemental Information & Materials (2017) (0)
- Too good to be false (ICPS 2015) (2015) (0)
- National Survey on Research Integrity (NSRI) (2018) (0)
- Times are Changing, Bias isn’t: A Meta-Meta-Analysis on Publication Bias Detection Practices, Prevalence Rates, and Predictors in Industrial/Organizational Psychology (2020) (0)
- The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015) (0)
- Scientalysis Revisited Survey Studies: Assumpions (2014) (0)
- European Journal of Developmental Psychology, Volume 11, 2014, List of Reviewers (2014) (0)
- Validity study statcheck (Appendix A in Nuijten et al., 2016) (2017) (0)
- Investigating interpretation of "p=.05" (2015) (0)
- Opinions on the value of direct replication: A survey of 2,000 psychologists (2014) (0)
- Support for Open Science Practices in Emotion Science: A Survey Study (2020) (0)
- Fast Forward Science: Risks and Benefits in the Rapid Science of COVID-19 (2021) (0)
- Validity study statcheck (2015) (0)
- Comment to Maxwell et al. (2015) (2015) (0)
- Replication reporting standards variables, review, and support (2014) (0)
- Outlier removal and Quality (2013) (0)
- Stereotype threat and female math test performance; a large-scale registered replication (2017) (0)
- This is (not) fine (2018) (0)
- Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach (0)
- The psychometrics of stereotype threat (2013) (0)
- Ecological validity of detecting data fabrication in experimental studies. (2016) (0)
- The (mis)reporting of psychological results in psychological journals (2016) (0)
- Unconf - Looking for an editor and editorial board members for the Journal of Open Psychology Data (2019) (0)
- Using statistics to detect potential data fabrication (WCRI 2015) (2015) (0)
- Accounting for statistical corrections (2017) (0)
- Human factors in statistics (2012) (0)
- RRR: Johns, Schmader and Martens (2005) (2018) (0)
- UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Researchers ’ Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research (2016) (0)
- How to protect privacy in open data. (2022) (0)
- Wicherts et al. (2016) paper (2016) (0)
- International Journal of Testing 2011 Reviewers (2012) (0)
- Personality and Individual Differences (2015) (0)
- File Drawer Problem (2020) (0)
- Are Speeded Tests Unfair? Modelling the Impact of Time Limits on the Gender Gap in Mathematics (2022) (0)
- Two large surveys on psychologists’ views on peer review and replication (2016) (0)
- Comment on Fiedler and Prager (2017): simulation code (2017) (0)
- availability of SEM scripts (2017) (0)
- MCV at the item level (2016) (0)
- Avoiding Conflicts of Interest in Awards: Assessing the Availability of Conflicts of Interest Statements of Psychological Societies (2019) (0)
- Questionnaires, sample details, and full data of the survey research (2014) (0)
- Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands. (2022) (0)
- Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology (2015) (0)
- National Survey on Research Integrity (2019) (0)
- Preregistration evaluation 2016 (2016) (0)
- The extended human and computer anxiety (2003) (0)
- p-Values Less Than 0.05 in Psychology: What is Going on? (2020) (0)
- Comparing recalculated p-values in Excel and R (2015) (0)
- Screening for Statistical Inconsistencies in COVID-19 Preprints (2020) (0)
- Hack - Avoiding conflicts of interest in academic awards and prizes: Assessing the guidelines provided by scientific societies (Beatrix Zone 3; 11:30) (2019) (0)
- Peer review transparency (2015) (0)
- Preregistration Study 3 (2017) (0)
- Postprint "Who believes in the storybook image of the scientist?" accepted for publication in Accountability in Research (2016) (0)
- Expectancy effects on the analysis of behavioral research data (2009) (0)
- How misconduct helped psychological science to thrive (2021) (0)
- Preregistration of Preregistration evaluation 2016 (2016) (0)
- Tilburg University On making the right choice (2015) (0)
- THIS (METHOD) IS (NOT) FINE. (2018) (0)
- The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider? (2023) (0)
- High p-values as a sign of data fabrication/falsification (2016) (0)
- Too good to be false (Tilburg Uni. 2015) (2015) (0)
- Power calculations and planned analyses (2014) (0)
- Author Correction: A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019) (0)
- Developing a Transparency Checklist (TRACK) for Behavioral Research Using an Expert Consensus Design (2018) (0)
- How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies? (2023) (0)
- Replication Data for: Stereotype threat experiment – high schools - 2016/2017 (2018) (0)
This paper list is powered by the following services:
Other Resources About Jelte Wicherts
What Schools Are Affiliated With Jelte Wicherts?
Jelte Wicherts is affiliated with the following schools:
