Lutz Bornmann
#102,692
Most Influential Person Now
Researcher
Lutz Bornmann's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings
Download Badge
Physics
Why Is Lutz Bornmann Influential?
(Suggest an Edit or Addition)Lutz Bornmann's Published Works
Number of citations in a given year to any of this author's works
Total number of citations to an author for the works they published in a given year. This highlights publication of the most important work(s) by the author
Published Works
- What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008) (1114)
- Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2014) (979)
- What do we know about the h index? (2007) (530)
- Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008) (476)
- What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (2013) (463)
- Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014) (455)
- Scientific peer review (2011) (397)
- Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005) (373)
- The state of h index research (2009) (365)
- Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2008) (322)
- A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants (2011) (270)
- Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007) (253)
- What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? (2012) (194)
- Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016) (187)
- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011) (173)
- The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2011) (171)
- Measuring the societal impact of research (2012) (167)
- Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics (2014) (167)
- The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits (2012) (157)
- A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010) (157)
- Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) (2013) (155)
- Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications (2011) (153)
- Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics (2012) (151)
- Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009) (149)
- Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization (2011) (146)
- Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions (2005) (134)
- Scientometrics in a changing research landscape (2014) (133)
- A persistent problem (2007) (125)
- Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime (2014) (117)
- How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2010) (117)
- Do Scientific Advancements Lean on the Shoulders of Giants? A Bibliometric Investigation of the Ortega Hypothesis (2010) (115)
- How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013) (114)
- Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants (2006) (112)
- The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies” (2014) (110)
- Fast growing research on negative emissions (2017) (110)
- Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016) (103)
- Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? (2014) (100)
- Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2017) (100)
- The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 (2012) (98)
- Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts (2009) (97)
- What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018 (2019) (97)
- BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2014) (93)
- The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations (2014) (92)
- Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization (2016) (91)
- Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes (2008) (91)
- A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I‐distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses (2016) (90)
- A Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications (2009) (89)
- How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study (2013) (87)
- Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) (85)
- Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements (2014) (83)
- Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data (2011) (83)
- A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication? (2011) (83)
- Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007) (81)
- Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy (2016) (80)
- How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature (2014) (79)
- Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis (2017) (77)
- The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach (2013) (77)
- Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? (2015) (77)
- How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? (2013) (77)
- The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy (2010) (75)
- Interdisciplinarity as Diversity in Citation Patterns among Journals: Rao-Stirling Diversity, Relative Variety, and the Gini coefficient (2018) (72)
- Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011) (72)
- Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (2016) (72)
- Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield (2017) (72)
- On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science (2014) (70)
- The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science: A visualization approach by using density maps (2011) (68)
- Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF) (2018) (67)
- How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013) (66)
- Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 (2013) (65)
- Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature (2017) (64)
- Quality assurance in higher education – meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany (2006) (64)
- Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2020) (63)
- How good is research really? (2013) (63)
- Panel peer review of grant applications: what do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decision-making in groups? (2010) (62)
- Scientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories (2008) (62)
- Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends (2013) (62)
- How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects (2013) (61)
- The effectiveness of the peer review process: inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie. (2008) (61)
- Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime (2014) (60)
- How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons (2013) (60)
- The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute (2016) (60)
- Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models (2012) (59)
- Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper (2010) (58)
- Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data (2008) (57)
- Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data using Overlays to Google Maps (2011) (57)
- Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST (2013) (56)
- Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data (2017) (55)
- What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide (2014) (55)
- Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? (2016) (55)
- Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors (2007) (54)
- Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach (2012) (53)
- Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication (2008) (53)
- Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment (2016) (53)
- The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews (2009) (52)
- Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores (2016) (51)
- Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches (2013) (50)
- Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data (2016) (49)
- How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index (2016) (47)
- Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references—a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics (2016) (47)
- How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data (2016) (46)
- The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis (2013) (46)
- Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of “Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy” (RPYS) (2014) (45)
- The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review (2010) (45)
- Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) (2013) (45)
- The wisdom of citing scientists (2013) (44)
- Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer (2018) (43)
- How accurately does Thomas Kuhn’s model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology? (2010) (43)
- The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact (2017) (43)
- How to measure research efficiency in higher education? Research grants vs. publication output (2018) (43)
- Do Author-Suggested Reviewers Rate Submissions More Favorably than Editor-Suggested Reviewers? A Study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2010) (43)
- Mimicry in science? (2010) (42)
- A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2010) (42)
- At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014 (2016) (41)
- Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review? (2012) (41)
- Global Nanotribology Research Output (1996–2010): A Scientometric Analysis (2013) (41)
- Hirsch‐Type Index Values for Organic Chemistry Journals: A Comparison of New Metrics with the Journal Impact Factor (2009) (41)
- Do Universities or Research Institutions With a Specific Subject Profile Have an Advantage or a Disadvantage in Institutional Rankings? A Latent Class Analysis With Data From the SCImago Ranking (2013) (41)
- Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis (2014) (41)
- The journal Impact Factor and alternative metrics (2016) (40)
- Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2009) (40)
- Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? (2013) (39)
- Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator c f = c-c 0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009) (39)
- Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2014) (39)
- Creativity in Science and the Link to Cited References: Is the Creative Potential of Papers Reflected in their Cited References? (2018) (39)
- The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal (2010) (39)
- Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley (2015) (39)
- Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of networks based on author keywords and hashtags (2018) (39)
- Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011) (38)
- Normalisation of citation impact in economics (2017) (38)
- Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time (2015) (37)
- The Anna Karenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science (2012) (37)
- Global Warming and Tea Production—The Bibliometric View on a Newly Emerging Research Topic (2017) (37)
- Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study (2006) (37)
- Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review (2020) (36)
- Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches1 (2019) (35)
- What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking (2017) (35)
- Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measuresq (2009) (35)
- The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations (2013) (35)
- On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective (2014) (34)
- Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009) (34)
- Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator (2016) (32)
- Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) (2011) (32)
- Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! (2018) (32)
- Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2010) (32)
- Scientific Revolution in Scientometrics: The Broadening of Impact from Citation to Societal (2016) (31)
- Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2012) (31)
- Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family (2017) (31)
- How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2012) (30)
- Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification (2016) (30)
- Model for Explaining Citations in Scholarly Publications: A Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2017) (30)
- Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics (2018) (30)
- h-Index research in scientometrics: A summary (2014) (30)
- Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study (2010) (30)
- Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013) (30)
- Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications (2007) (29)
- Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data (2009) (29)
- HistCite analysis of papers constituting the h index research front (2012) (29)
- The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index (2010) (29)
- Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking (2011) (29)
- Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper (2019) (29)
- Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation (2018) (29)
- Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2009) (28)
- Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures (2015) (28)
- Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review (2014) (28)
- Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches (2012) (28)
- A scientometric analysis of international collaboration and growth of literature at the macro level (2017) (27)
- The detection of (2011) (27)
- How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study (2008) (27)
- The substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions: Guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals (2014) (26)
- Detecting the historical roots of tribology research: a bibliometric analysis (2016) (26)
- Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts (2016) (26)
- Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield’s publications (2017) (25)
- “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle (2016) (25)
- A New Family of Cumulative Indexes for Measuring Scientific Performance (2012) (25)
- Citation Environment of Angewandte Chemie (2007) (25)
- An evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact, and a proposal for making them better (2020) (24)
- Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field‐normalized bibliometric indicator (2015) (24)
- Field classification of publications in Dimensions: a first case study testing its reliability and validity (2018) (24)
- Which cities produce excellent papers worldwide more than can be expected? A new mapping approach--using Google Maps--based on statistical significance testing (2011) (24)
- Research Misconduct - Definitions, Manifestations and Extent (2013) (24)
- The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review (2012) (24)
- New features of CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer) (2016) (24)
- The emergence of plate tectonics and the Kuhnian model of paradigm shift: a bibliometric case study based on the Anna Karenina principle (2013) (23)
- The normalization of citation counts based on classification systems (2013) (23)
- Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data (2019) (23)
- Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data (2017) (23)
- Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders (2004) (23)
- Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009) (23)
- Heat waves: a hot topic in climate change research (2021) (23)
- Recent Developments in China–U.S. Cooperation in Science (2014) (22)
- Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review (2006) (22)
- Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund’s final project report data (2012) (22)
- Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications (2005) (22)
- How long is the peer review process for journal manuscripts? A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition. (2010) (22)
- Climate change and viticulture - a quantitative analysis of a highly dynamic research field (2017) (22)
- The potential and problems of peer evaluation in higher education and research (2007) (21)
- Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting and related topics (2017) (21)
- Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) with publications in the area of academic efficiency studies: what are the historical roots of this research topic? (2018) (21)
- The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? (2017) (21)
- The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded (2016) (21)
- Enhancing the h index for the objective assessment of healthcare researcher performance and impact (2013) (21)
- Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level (2016) (21)
- To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics (2016) (21)
- Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative (2012) (21)
- Disruption index depends on length of citation window (2019) (20)
- Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex‐ante and ex‐post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund (2015) (20)
- A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: an overview of empirical studies (2020) (20)
- Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley data (2016) (20)
- From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2010) (20)
- Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today? (2015) (20)
- Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) (2020) (19)
- The calculation of the single publication h index and related performance measures (2011) (19)
- The Role of Climate in the Collapse of the Maya Civilization: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Discourse (2017) (19)
- Distributions instead of single numbers: Percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014) (19)
- Ranking and mappping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide: The third release of excellencemapping.net (2015) (18)
- Measuring the societal impact of research: references to climate change research in relevant policy literature (2016) (18)
- Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010) (18)
- Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations) (2014) (18)
- Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations (2016) (18)
- An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany (2015) (17)
- Functional use of frequently and infrequently cited articles in citing publications: A content analysis of citations to articles with low and high citation counts (2007) (17)
- t factor: A metric for measuring impact on Twitter (2015) (17)
- What do altmetrics counts mean? A plea for content analyses (2016) (17)
- Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows: A Boolean Probit Analysis (2005) (17)
- Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany (2016) (16)
- The validity of staff editors’ initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2010) (16)
- Journal Impact Factor: "the poor man's citation analysis" and alternative approaches (2013) (16)
- Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics (2019) (16)
- A better alternative to the h index (2013) (16)
- Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data (2017) (15)
- Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data (2018) (15)
- In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2012) (15)
- Ranking institutions within a university based on their scientific performance: A percentile-based approach (2015) (15)
- hα: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo (2019) (15)
- Reliability , fairness and predictive validity of committee peer review Evaluation of the selection of post-graduate fellowship holders by the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (2004) (15)
- From P100 to P100': A new citation‐rank approach (2014) (15)
- Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores (2018) (15)
- Assigning publications to multiple subject categories for bibliometric analysis: An empirical case study based on percentiles (2014) (15)
- Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers (2020) (15)
- What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking (2014) (14)
- The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor (2018) (14)
- Hot and cold spots in the US research: A spatial analysis of bibliometric data on the institutional level (2018) (14)
- Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity? (2019) (14)
- The b index as a measure of scientific excellence. A promising supplement to the h index (2007) (14)
- The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2010) (14)
- Field-normalized Impact Factors: A Comparison of Rescaling versus Fractionally Counted IFs (2012) (14)
- Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings (2017) (14)
- The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models (2009) (14)
- How efficiently produce elite US universities highly cited papers? A case study based on input and output data (2018) (13)
- Alternative article‐level metrics (2018) (13)
- Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems (2011) (13)
- Does the Journal Peer Review Select the “Best” from the Work Submitted? The State of Empirical Research (2010) (13)
- Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change (2018) (13)
- Excellence networks in science: A Web-based application based on Bayesian multilevel logistic regression (BMLR) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully (2015) (12)
- The graduation shift of German universities of applied sciences (2019) (12)
- Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis: Response to discussants (2016) (12)
- Overlay maps based on Mendeley data: The use of altmetrics for readership networks (2016) (12)
- The calculation of the single publication h index and related performances measures: A Web application based on Google Scholar data (2011) (12)
- Confidence intervals for Journal Impact Factors (2017) (12)
- Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention (2018) (12)
- The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science (2017) (12)
- A proposal for a First-Citation-Speed-Index (2011) (12)
- The advantage of the use of samples in evaluative bibliometric studies (2013) (12)
- The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK (2018) (12)
- The value and credits of n-authors publications (2018) (11)
- Referenced Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) and Algorithmic Historiography: The Bibliometric Reconstruction of András Schubert's Œuvre (2016) (11)
- Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts (2020) (11)
- Do women have less success in peer review (2009) (11)
- Networks of reader and country status: an analysis of Mendeley reader statistics (2015) (11)
- Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry (2011) (11)
- Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers’ database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany (2015) (11)
- Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers? (2017) (11)
- Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy with Cited References Disambiguation (2016) (10)
- Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention (2020) (10)
- Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph (2017) (10)
- Efficiency of research performance and the glass researcher (2016) (10)
- Thomas theorem in research evaluation (2020) (10)
- Climate and the Decline and Fall of the Western Roman Empire: A Bibliometric View on an Interdisciplinary Approach to Answer a Most Classic Historical Question (2018) (10)
- Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review (2007) (10)
- Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers (2021) (10)
- Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany (2017) (10)
- On the meaningful and non-meaningful use of reference sets in bibliometrics (2014) (9)
- Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations?: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center (2020) (9)
- Measuring the broader impact of research: The potential of altmetrics (2014) (9)
- Proposal of using scaling for calculating field-normalized citation scores (2016) (9)
- Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings (2017) (9)
- Redundancies in H Index Variants and the Proposal of the Number of Top-Cited Papers as an Attractive Indicator (2012) (9)
- Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012) (2012) (9)
- How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators (2019) (8)
- Research diversification and its relationship with publication counts and impact: A case study based on Australian professors (2019) (8)
- Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents by using an “Integrated Impact Indicator” (I3) (2011) (8)
- h-based I3-type multivariate vectors: multidimensional indicators of publication and citation scores (2017) (8)
- Impact of particularistic attributes in access to and in later career attainment after achieving the doctoral degree in Germany (2004) (8)
- F1000Prime: an analysis of discipline-specific reader data from Mendeley (2015) (8)
- Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists (2015) (8)
- How to analyse percentile impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes and top-cited papers (2012) (8)
- Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents - such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach (2019) (8)
- Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013) (8)
- The problem of percentile rank scores used with small reference sets (2013) (8)
- Bibliometric Analysis in the Field of Quantum Technology (2021) (8)
- Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers (2019) (8)
- Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method (2017) (8)
- Further steps in integrating the platforms of WoS and Scopus: Historiography with HistCite™ and main-path analysis (2017) (8)
- Discussion about the new Nature Index (2015) (7)
- Do we need the E-index in addition to the h-index and its variants? (2011) (7)
- Which are the best cities for psychology research worldwide? A map visualizing city ratios of observed and expected numbers of highly-cited papers (2011) (7)
- Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How is climate change research perceived in policy documents? (2015) (7)
- Is culture related to strong science? An empirical investigation (2019) (7)
- On the function of university rankings (2014) (7)
- Who Publishes, Reads, and Cites Papers? An Analysis of Country Information (2015) (7)
- Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry (2011) (7)
- Measuring Individual Performance with Comprehensive Bibliometric Reports as an Alternative to h-Index Values (2018) (7)
- Normalisation of citation impact in economics (2019) (7)
- How much does the expected number of citations for a publication change if it contains the address of a specific scientific institute? A new approach for the analysis of citation data on the institutional level based on regression models (2016) (7)
- Review for "A multidimensional perspective on the citation impact of scientific publications" (2020) (7)
- Does the hα-index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? The introduction of agent-based simulations into scientometrics (2020) (7)
- Letter to the Editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications (2015) (7)
- Productivity does not equal usefulness (2018) (7)
- Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information (2012) (7)
- A proposal to revise the disruption index (2021) (7)
- Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics? (2021) (6)
- Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching (2019) (6)
- Citation concept analysis (CCA) of Robert K. Merton’s book Social Theory and Social Structure: How often are certain concepts from the book cited in subsequent publications? (2020) (6)
- Bibliometrics-based decision trees (BBDTs) based on bibliometrics-based heuristics (BBHs): Visualized guidelines for the use of bibliometrics in research evaluation (2020) (6)
- Proposal of a minimum constraint for indicators based on means or averages (2016) (6)
- Spatial bibliometrics on the city level (2018) (6)
- How Efficiently Do Elite US Universities Produce Highly Cited Papers? (2019) (6)
- Evaluations by Peer Review in Science (2013) (6)
- Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics * (2019) (6)
- Influential cited references in FEMS Microbiology Letters: lessons from Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) (2019) (6)
- Methods for methods' sake (2004) (6)
- Are papers addressing certain diseases perceived where these diseases are prevalent? The proposal to use Twitter data as social-spatial sensors (2020) (6)
- Relationship between field-normalized indicators calculated with different approaches of field-categorization (2018) (6)
- An empirical look at the nature index (2017) (6)
- Bibliometric analysis of scientific development in countries of the Union of South American Nations (Unasur) (2012) (6)
- Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) in practice: a software tutorial (2021) (6)
- Getting to yes: the fate of neuroradiology manuscripts rejected by radiology over a 2-year period. (2011) (6)
- Complex tasks and simple solutions: The use of heuristics in the evaluation of research (2015) (6)
- The concordance of field-normalized scores based on Web of Science and Microsoft Academic data: A case study in computer sciences (2018) (5)
- Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied? (2018) (5)
- Do altmetrics assess societal impact in the same way as case studies? An empirical analysis testing the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) (2018) (5)
- Publishing: Criteria for Nature Index questioned (2014) (5)
- Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011) (5)
- Which cities' paper output and citation impact are above expectation in information science? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches (2011) (5)
- Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed one (P100) (2013) (5)
- Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming (2017) (5)
- Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010 (2011) (5)
- Societal Impact Measurement of Research Papers (2019) (5)
- Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations (2018) (5)
- Identifying seminal works most important for research fields: Software for the Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) (2016) (5)
- Historical roots of pain management in infants: A bibliometric analysis using reference publication year spectroscopy (2020) (5)
- How to identify the roots of broad research topics and fields? The introduction of RPYS sampling using the example of climate change research (2018) (5)
- On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) (4)
- Which cities produce worldwide more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach--using Google Maps--based on statistical significance testing (2011) (4)
- The Generation of Large Networks from Web-of-Science Data (2014) (4)
- The "Tournaments" Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies: Power-Weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator (2014) (4)
- A call for governments to pause Twitter censorship: using Twitter data as social-spatial sensors of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 research diffusion (2021) (4)
- Standards for the application of bibliometrics in the evaluation of individual researchers working in the natural sciences (2013) (4)
- A call for governments to pause Twitter censorship: a cross-sectional study using Twitter data as social-spatial sensors of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 research diffusion (2020) (4)
- Replicability and the public/private divide (2015) (4)
- The Power-weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator: Testing the “Tournaments” Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies (2016) (4)
- Comments to the response of Rodríguez‐Navarro (2013) (4)
- Investigating dissemination of scientific information on Twitter: A study of topic networks in opioid publications (2021) (4)
- From P100 to P100_: Conception and improvement of a new citation-rank approach in bibliometrics (2013) (4)
- How Can Journal Impact Factors be (2012) (4)
- Opium in science and society: Numbers (2018) (4)
- A macro level scientometric analysis of world tribology research output (1998 - 2012) (2014) (4)
- Study of citation networks in tribology research (2014) (4)
- Convergent validity of altmetrics and case studies for assessing societal impact: an analysis based on UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) data (2018) (4)
- Which kind of papers has higher or lower altmetric counts? A study using article-level metrics from PLOS and F1000Prime (2014) (4)
- Use of the journal impact factor as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers: A rejoinder on a comment by Peters (2017) (2017) (4)
- Recent Developments in China-U.S. Science Cooperation (2014) (4)
- The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures (2015) (4)
- Corrigendum to "Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags" [J. Informetrics 13 (2019) 695-707] (2020) (4)
- Funding decision-making systems: An empirical comparison of continuous and dichotomous approaches based on psychometric theory (2016) (3)
- A Proposal to Revise and Simplify the Disruption Indicator (2020) (3)
- Journal peer review as an information retrieval process (2012) (3)
- Gould, T.H.P. (2013). Do we still need peer review? An argument for change. Scarecrow Press: Plymouth, UK (2014) (3)
- Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R (2019) (3)
- On the disruptive power of small-teams research (2020) (3)
- Efficiency of Universities and Research-Focused Institutions Worldwide: An Empirical DEA Investigation Based on Institutional Publication Numbers and Estimated Academic Staff Numbers (2020) (3)
- Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example (2020) (3)
- Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press) (2017) (3)
- Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of computer science papers from Eastern Europe (2020) (3)
- The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) bibliometric indicators: How well does I3 perform for impact measurement? (2019) (3)
- The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor (2019) (3)
- Empirical analysis of recent temporal dynamics of research fields: Annual publications in chemistry and related areas as an example (2022) (3)
- Scores of a specific field-normalized indicator calculated with different approaches of field-categorization: Are the scores different or similar? (2021) (3)
- How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings (2015) (3)
- Ranking institutions by the handicap principle (2014) (3)
- Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan’s research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer (2020) (3)
- Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators (2022) (3)
- Citation impact of papers published from six prolific countries: A national comparison based on InCites data (2012) (3)
- Evaluating individual researchers' performance (2013) (3)
- MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to Smolinsky and Marx (2018) (2018) (3)
- Count regression models in informetrics (2016) (3)
- I3: A Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor (2018) (2)
- A Reproducible Journal Classification and Global Map of Science Based on Aggregated Journal-Journal Citation Relations (2016) (2)
- Report on Workshop III "Cited References Analysis Using CRExplorer" at the 18th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2021) (2021) (2)
- Nature's top 100 revisited (2015) (2)
- Quantum technology 2.0 - topics and contributing countries from 1980 to 2018 (2021) (2)
- Approximation of citation distributions to the Poisson distribution (2018) (2)
- Bibliometrics-based decision tree (BBDT) for deciding whether two universities in the Leiden ranking differ substantially in their performance (2019) (2)
- How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles (2020) (2)
- MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to the comment by Smolinsky (in press) (2019) (2)
- The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links (2022) (2)
- The Anna Karenina principle: A concept for the explanation of success in science (2011) (2)
- How fractional counting affects the Impact Factor: Steps towards field-independent classifications of scholarly journals and literature (2010) (2)
- h{\alpha}: The Scientist as Chimpanzee or Bonobo (2018) (2)
- The Anna Karenina principle: A mechanism for the explanation of success in science (2011) (2)
- How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons (2013) (2)
- Excellence networks in science: A web-based application (www.excellence-networks.net) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully (2015) (2)
- “Interdisciplinarity” and “Synergy” in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan (2020) (2)
- Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from PLOS (altmetrics) and F1000Prime (paper tags) (2014) (2)
- How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data (2022) (2)
- The Second-order h-type Indicators for Identifying Top Units (2018) (2)
- Measuring impact in research evaluations (2014) (2)
- Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups in excellencemapping.net: a new release of the excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores (2021) (2)
- Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany (2017) (2)
- On scientific misconduct (2014) (2)
- Investigating Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge on Twitter: A Study of Topic Networks of Opioid Publications (2021) (1)
- PLOTRPYS: Stata module to plot a spectrogram using CSV export from CRExplorer (2017) (1)
- Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking (2012) (1)
- In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2012) (1)
- Simulation of the h index use at university departments within the bibliometrics-based heuristics framework: Can the indicator be used to compare individual researchers? (2022) (1)
- Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper (2021) (1)
- The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: national and international citations in papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and UK (2018) (1)
- Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis (2017) (1)
- The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor (2012) (1)
- For which disciplines are papers covered in F1000Prime interesting? An analysis of discipline-specific reader data from Mendeley (2015) (1)
- The State of Altmetrics: A Tenth Anniversary Celebration (2020) (1)
- Same-gender citations do not indicate a substantial gender homophily bias (2022) (1)
- Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups: A new excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores (2021) (1)
- Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics (2015) (1)
- Is culture a contributing factor of strong science? (2019) (1)
- Highly Cited Researchers 2014 and 2015: An investigation of some of the world's most influential scientific minds on the institutional and country level (2018) (1)
- The integrated impact indicator (I3), the top-10% excellence indicator, and the use of non-parametric statistics (2012) (1)
- How to analyse percentile impact (2012) (1)
- Which research institution performs better than average in a subject category or better than selected other institutions? (2018) (1)
- Is it necessary to consider suburbs (or small cities in the close proximity) and name variants in a citation impact analysis for bigger cities? An investigation using Munich as an example (2011) (1)
- Alphabetized co-authorship in economics reconsidered (2019) (1)
- R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science) (2019) (1)
- Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper (2020) (1)
- New analysis features of the CRExplorer for identifying influential publications (2018) (1)
- Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) in practice: Three RPYS analyzes in the course of Workshop III "Cited References Analysis Using CRExplorer" at the 18th ISSI conference (2021) (1)
- Improved clusterings and visualizations of 11,359 journals in the JCRs 2015 (2021) (0)
- United States, Europe, and Asia: Diversity in Nobel Prize-Winning Affiliations (2017) (0)
- How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data (2017) (0)
- How to measure research performance of single scientists? A proposal for an index based on scientific prizes: The Prize Winner Index (PWI) (2023) (0)
- Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer (2018) (0)
- Field-normalization of impact factors: rescaling versus fractionally counted (2013) (0)
- Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method (2017) (0)
- Handicapped research institutions winning the global research competition: A focus on Croatia (2014) (0)
- How efficient are research universities in Germany, which were funded for their “future concepts” in the excellence initiative? An empirical comparison of input- and output-data (2019) (0)
- The Completion Shift of German Universities of Applied Sciences (2017) (0)
- The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures (2014) (0)
- Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? (2016) (0)
- Field classification of publications in Dimensions: a first case study testing its reliability and validity (2018) (0)
- Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) (2020) (0)
- hα: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo (2019) (0)
- The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science (2017) (0)
- Studying Bibliometrics-Based Heuristics (BBHs): A New Research Program on the use of Bibliometrics in Research Evaluation (2020) (0)
- Correction to: Normalisation of citation impact in economics (2019) (0)
- Do we still need peer review? An argument for change - By T.H.P. Gould (2014) (0)
- Field- and time-normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data. (2017) (0)
- Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data (2018) (0)
- Metrics to evaluate research (2012) (0)
- Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021) (0)
- Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! (2018) (0)
- WOSLOAD: Stata module to load datasets from Web of Science data (2012) (0)
- The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach (2013) (0)
- Recent Developments in China–U.S. Cooperation in Science (2015) (0)
- Raw data for version 2 of article "F1000Prime: an analysis of discipline-specific reader data from Mendeley" (2019) (0)
- Letter. New Google Scholar section with information on funded publications (2021) (0)
- Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention (2018) (0)
- BABIBPLOT: Stata module to plot two graph types which are rooted in Bland-Altman plots using journal and paper percentiles (2017) (0)
- How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index (2016) (0)
- How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study (2014) (0)
- Career development and motivation analyses of female and male applicants to the EMBO Long-Term-Fellowship Programme (2010) (0)
- Fractionally counted versus integer-counted impact factors in the ISI journal set 2008 (2011) (0)
- The emergence of plate tectonics and the Kuhnian model of paradigm shift: a bibliometric case study based on the Anna Karenina principle (2012) (0)
- Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers? (2017) (0)
- Revolutions in science: The proposal of an approach for the identification of most important researchers, institutions and countries based on co-citation reference publication year spectroscopy exemplified at research on physical modelling of Earth’s climate (2023) (0)
- Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? (2016) (0)
- Which papers cited which tweets? An empirical analysis based on Scopus data (2020) (0)
- On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science (2014) (0)
- R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science) (2019) (0)
- Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2011) (0)
- On the disruptive power of small-teams research (2020) (0)
- Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper (2019) (0)
- Identification of Potential Young Talented Individuals in the Natural and Life Sciences: A Bibliometric Approach (2022) (0)
- The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor (2012) (0)
- Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016) (0)
- Response to Stephen Holgate (2015) (0)
- Bibliometrics-based decision tree (BBDT) for deciding whether two universities in the Leiden ranking differ substantially in their performance (2019) (0)
- Holistic approach based assessment of social efficiency of research conducted by higher educational establishments (2020) (0)
- Conceptual funding of a new citation-rank approach in bibliometrics: P100 (2013) (0)
- Thomas theorem in research evaluation (2020) (0)
- New approaches for increasing the reliability of the h index research performance measurement (2009) (0)
- New features of CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer) (2016) (0)
- Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics (2019) (0)
- The Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) and the Journal Impact Factor: A Non‑Parametric Alternative (2019) (0)
- Which Papers Cited Which Tweets? An Exploratory Analysis Based on Scopus Data (2023) (0)
- PROPOSAL Of USing SCALing fOR (2020) (0)
- Are there biases in decisions to tweet on scientific papers? A plea for conducting an experimental Twitter study. Technical note (2022) (0)
- Anchoring effects in the assessment of papers: The proposal for an empirical survey of citing authors (2021) (0)
- Quality assurance in higher education – meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany 1 (2006) (0)
- 1 I 3 : A Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor (2018) (0)
- Revolutions in science: The proposal of an approach for the identification of most important researchers, institutions, and countries based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) (2022) (0)
- How well does I 3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators ? (2019) (0)
- How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013) (0)
- Expected values in percentile indicators (2016) (0)
- BIBREP: Stata module to produce a bibliometric report on a single senior researcher (2017) (0)
- Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations) (2014) (0)
- Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations (2018) (0)
- Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield’s publications (2017) (0)
- At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014 (2016) (0)
- Corrigendum to "Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data" Journal of Informetrics Volume 11, Issue 3, August 2017, Pages 788-799 (2021) (0)
- Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements (2016) (0)
- An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany (2014) (0)
- Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches (2013) (0)
- Ranking institutions by the handicap principle (2014) (0)
- The geography of references in elite articles - underlying data (2018) (0)
- Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of “Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy” (RPYS) (2014) (0)
- Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification (2017) (0)
- How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators (2019) (0)
- Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers’ database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany (2015) (0)
- Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming (2017) (0)
- Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references—a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics (2016) (0)
- WOSADDRESS: Stata module to convert datasets from Web of Science data from wide to long (2012) (0)
- The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review (2011) (0)
- Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph (2018) (0)
- ARTÍCULOS PROPOSAL Of USing SCALing fOR CALCULATing fieLd-nORmALized (2016) (0)
- Discussion about the new Nature Index (2014) (0)
- GROUPDIST: Stata module to generate within-group minimum and maximum distances (2012) (0)
- On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective (2014) (0)
- Principles for comparing sets of documents in citation analysis: From independent samples to comparing sub-samples in terms of percentile ranks (2013) (0)
- Productivity does not equal usefulness (2018) (0)
- Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield (2017) (0)
- The historical roots of iMetrics: Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy (RPYS) routinized and applied to Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and (a subset of) JASIST (2013) (0)
- Panel Data and Multilevel Analyses of Academic Publishing Success Paper (2022) (0)
- Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press) (2017) (0)
- Anchoring effects in the assessment of papers: An empirical survey of citing authors (2023) (0)
- Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany (2016) (0)
- Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative (2012) (0)
- Do bibliometrics and altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime, altmetrics, and citation data. (2017) (0)
- Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change (2018) (0)
- Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (2016) (0)
- Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper (2020) (0)
- Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings (2016) (0)
- Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores (2018) (0)
- Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level (2016) (0)
- Detecting the historical roots of tribology research: a bibliometric analysis (2016) (0)
- Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan’s research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer (2020) (0)
- Confidence intervals for Journal Impact Factors (2017) (0)
- Identification of young talented individuals in the natural and life sciences using bibliometric data (2022) (0)
- The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science (2014) (0)
- Efficiency of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide: The introduction of a new input indicator reflecting institutional staff numbers (2023) (0)
- Correction to: Normalisation of citation impact in economics (2019) (0)
- Relevance of document types in the scores’ calculation of a specific field-normalized indicator: Are the scores strongly dependent on or nearly independent of the document type handling? (2022) (0)
- Which cities' paper output and (2011) (0)
- Predictive validity of editorial decisions at an open access journal: A case study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2010) (0)
- Letter to the Editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications (2015) (0)
This paper list is powered by the following services:
What Schools Are Affiliated With Lutz Bornmann?
Lutz Bornmann is affiliated with the following schools:
