Mary Dixon-Woods
#106,448
Most Influential Person Now
Social scientist
Mary Dixon-Woods's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings
Mary Dixon-Woodsphilosophy Degrees
Philosophy
#6760
World Rank
#9855
Historical Rank
Logic
#3951
World Rank
#5185
Historical Rank
Download Badge
Philosophy
Mary Dixon-Woods's Degrees
- Masters Social Research Methods University of Sussex
Why Is Mary Dixon-Woods Influential?
(Suggest an Edit or Addition)According to Wikipedia, Mary Dixon-Woods is a social scientist who researches quality and safety in healthcare. She is a professor of healthcare improvement studies at the department of public health and primary care at the University of Cambridge, where she is also director of the Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute , and a fellow of Homerton College, Cambridge. Dixon-Woods was the co-editor-in-chief of BMJ Quality & Safety from 2011 to 2020.
Mary Dixon-Woods's Published Works
Published Works
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014) (5227)
- Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006) (1426)
- Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005) (1104)
- Enzymes. 3rd ed (1979) (1061)
- Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. (2005) (928)
- How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006) (756)
- Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. (2011) (564)
- Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) (546)
- Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods (2007) (517)
- The problem of appraising qualitative research (2004) (514)
- Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature (2012) (489)
- Reality check for checklists (2009) (406)
- Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study (2013) (395)
- Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies (2011) (347)
- Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. (2001) (332)
- Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence (2004) (315)
- Managing communication with young people who have a potentially life threatening chronic illness: qualitative study of patients and parents (2003) (300)
- Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies (2004) (289)
- Parenting in a crisis: conceptualising mothers of children with cancer. (2002) (282)
- An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. (2016) (276)
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble (2015) (264)
- How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types (2015) (256)
- Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports (2007) (252)
- Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program (2013) (241)
- Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets. (2001) (227)
- The problem with root cause analysis (2016) (209)
- Qualitative research in systematic reviews (2001) (198)
- Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement (2013) (189)
- Does quality improvement improve quality? (2016) (187)
- Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018) (179)
- Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation (2011) (175)
- Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2002) (167)
- Parents' accounts of obtaining a diagnosis of childhood cancer (2001) (161)
- Why is U.K. medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving "bad apple" doctors. (2011) (156)
- Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science (2016) (154)
- [Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide]. (2016) (149)
- Promotion of improvement as a science (2013) (148)
- The problem of appraising qualitative research. (2004) (146)
- Making IT work - harnessing the power of health information technology ti improve care in England (2016) (143)
- Beyond metrics? Utilizing ‘soft intelligence’ for healthcare quality and safety (2015) (138)
- Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health (2016) (134)
- Why is Patient Safety so Hard? A Selective Review of Ethnographic Studies (2010) (130)
- Patients' perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study (2006) (129)
- Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase (2011) (129)
- Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. (2007) (125)
- Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. (2012) (121)
- A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries (2013) (120)
- What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program. (2012) (117)
- Medical and lay views of irritable bowel syndrome. (2000) (116)
- How to improve healthcare improvement—an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods (2019) (107)
- Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views (2006) (102)
- An ethnographic study of classifying and accounting for risk at the sharp end of medical wards. (2009) (98)
- Patient safety and the problem of many hands (2016) (97)
- Problems and promises of innovation: why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new (2011) (96)
- Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study (2004) (96)
- Education and self-management for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' views (2008) (95)
- Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study (2006) (93)
- Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters. (2009) (92)
- What can ethnography do for quality and safety in health care? (2003) (89)
- Choosing and using services for sexual health: a qualitative study of women's views (2001) (88)
- What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi‐site ethnographic study (2015) (88)
- Continuity and Trust in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study Informed by Game Theory (2010) (85)
- Partnerships with children (1999) (81)
- Estimating deaths due to medical error: the ongoing controversy and why it matters (2016) (81)
- Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare (2018) (80)
- Why do women consent to surgery, even when they do not want to? An interactionist and Bourdieusian analysis. (2006) (79)
- Why do people cooperate with medical research? Findings from three studies. (2009) (73)
- Why is patient safety so hard in low-income countries? A qualitative study of healthcare workers’ views in two African hospitals (2015) (72)
- Getting women to hospital is not enough: a qualitative study of access to emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh (2006) (70)
- Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy (2006) (69)
- A qualitative study of the health‐related quality of life of disabled children (2007) (69)
- Teaching and learning about human sexuality in undergraduate medical education (2002) (67)
- Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters. (2007) (64)
- Did a quality improvement collaborative make stroke care better? A cluster randomized trial (2014) (63)
- Commodification of Body Parts: By Medicine or by Media? (2006) (62)
- Professionalism Redundant, Reshaped, or Reinvigorated? Realizing the “Third Logic” in Contemporary Health Care (2015) (62)
- Remote care for mental health: qualitative study with service users, carers and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) (61)
- An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined (2008) (61)
- Regulation and the social licence for medical research (2008) (60)
- The problem with composite indicators (2018) (56)
- How to be a very safe maternity unit: An ethnographic study (2019) (55)
- Improving recruitment to clinical trials for cancer in childhood. (2008) (54)
- Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison (2006) (53)
- Improving quality and safety of care using "technovigilance": an ethnographic case study of secondary use of data from an electronic prescribing and decision support system. (2013) (52)
- Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts (2005) (51)
- Human Tissue and ‘the Public’: The Case of Childhood Cancer Tumour Banking (2008) (51)
- A qualitative study of families of a child with a nut allergy (2011) (51)
- A qualitative study of experiences of NHS mental healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic (2021) (48)
- Design-based regulation and patient safety: a regulatory studies perspective. (2010) (47)
- How collaborative are quality improvement collaboratives: a qualitative study in stroke care (2014) (46)
- Parents' accounts of wheeze and asthma related symptoms: a qualitative study (2002) (46)
- What is chronic illness? (2005) (45)
- Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of challenges relating to voice about safety concerns (2018) (44)
- Modernising medical regulation: where are we now? (2010) (44)
- Gender and access to healthcare in the UK: A critical interpretive synthesis of the literature (2007) (44)
- Representing childhood cancer: accounts from newspapers and parents. (2003) (44)
- ‘New’ and distributed leadership in quality and safety in health care, or ‘old’ and hierarchical? An interview study with strategic stakeholders (2013) (43)
- Systematic reviews and qualitative methods (2009) (42)
- Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? (2009) (40)
- How Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic Review. (2016) (40)
- ‘Bad apples’: time to redefine as a type of systems problem? (2013) (39)
- Learning through observation: the role of ethnography in improving critical care (2010) (39)
- Qualitative study of views and experiences of performance management for healthcare-associated infections (2016) (39)
- The role of primary care professionals in women's experiences of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study. (2012) (38)
- Provision of cancer information as a "support for navigating the knowledge landscape": findings from a critical interpretive literature synthesis. (2013) (38)
- Identity and role in parenting a child with cancer (2002) (38)
- Practices and views on fetal heart monitoring: a structured observation and interview study (2006) (37)
- Is 'inconsistency' in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection (2007) (37)
- Between surveillance and subjectification: professionals and the governance of quality and patient safety in English hospitals. (2013) (36)
- Women’s accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem? (2004) (35)
- Effect of NHS walk-in centre on local primary healthcare services: before and after observational study (2003) (33)
- A qualitative study of speaking out about patient safety concerns in intensive care units (2017) (33)
- Researching chronic childhood illness: the example of childhood cancer (2006) (33)
- Clinical negligence costs: taking action to safeguard NHS sustainability (2020) (32)
- Women’s views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the CARPET1 trial (2010) (32)
- Lay evaluation of services for childhood asthma. (2002) (32)
- Tissue Samples as ‘Gifts’ for Research: A Qualitative Study of Families and Professionals (2008) (30)
- Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project (2012) (30)
- What to expect when you're evaluating healthcare improvement: a concordat approach to managing collaboration and uncomfortable realities (2015) (30)
- Learning from high risk industries may not be straightforward: a qualitative study of the hierarchy of risk controls approach in healthcare (2017) (28)
- Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functions. (2012) (28)
- Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements? (2009) (28)
- Republished: How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types (2015) (27)
- Breaking the ceremonial order: patients' and doctors' accounts of removal from a general practitioner's list. (2006) (27)
- Contextual issues and qualitative research (2016) (26)
- Taking the heat or taking the temperature? A qualitative study of a large-scale exercise in seeking to measure for improvement, not blame (2018) (26)
- Seven features of safety in maternity units: a framework based on multisite ethnography and stakeholder consultation (2020) (24)
- Childhood cancer and users' views: a critical perspective. (2002) (24)
- Walkrounds in practice: corrupting or enhancing a quality improvement intervention? A qualitative study. (2014) (24)
- Ending the doctor-patient relationship in general practice: a proposed model. (2004) (24)
- Improving Employee Voice About Transgressive or Disruptive Behavior: A Case Study (2018) (23)
- Qualitative research on breastfeeding in the UK: A narrative review and methodological reflection (2007) (22)
- A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement (2019) (21)
- Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act 2004. (2007) (21)
- Frameworks for change in healthcare organisations: A formative evaluation of the NHS Change Model (2013) (21)
- What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children? (2010) (20)
- Patients' accounts of being removed from their general practitioner's list: qualitative study (2003) (20)
- Effect of media portrayals of removal of children's tissue on UK tumour bank (2005) (18)
- How will it work? A qualitative study of strategic stakeholders' accounts of a patient safety initiative (2010) (18)
- Harveian Oration 2018: Improving quality and safety in healthcare (2019) (18)
- A qualitative study of choosing and using an NHS Walk-in Centre. (2005) (18)
- A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects (2020) (17)
- A qualitative study of design stakeholders’ views of developing and implementing a registry-based learning health system (2020) (17)
- Providing the results of research to participants: a mixed-method study of the benefits and challenges of a consultative approach (2011) (17)
- Prostate specific antigen testing for prostate cancer (2002) (17)
- Recruitment of women into trials (2002) (16)
- After Mid Staffordshire: from acknowledgement, through learning, to improvement (2014) (16)
- Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care (2019) (16)
- Simulation research to enhance patient safety and outcomes: recommendations of the Simnovate Patient Safety Domain Group (2017) (16)
- Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people (2016) (16)
- Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study (2018) (15)
- What do research ethics committees say about applications to do cancer trials? (2008) (15)
- What do they know?: a content analysis of women's perceptions of trial information (2004) (15)
- Safer Clinical Systems: evaluation findings Learning from the independent evaluation of the second phase of the Safer Clinical Systems programme (2014) (15)
- Consent revisited: the impact of return of results on participants' views and expectations about trial participation (2015) (14)
- [Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide]. (2016) (14)
- Women's accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem? (2004) (14)
- Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers (2019) (14)
- Towards a new era of tissue-based diagnosis and research (2007) (14)
- A qualitative study of participants’ views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank (2017) (14)
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project (2016) (13)
- Breaking up is never easy: GPs' accounts of removing patients from their lists. (2003) (13)
- Seeking consent to tissue banking: a survey of health professionals in childhood cancer. (2009) (13)
- Dissemination of printed information for patients: a qualitative study of general practices (1998) (12)
- Describing methods and interventions: a protocol for the systematic analysis of the perioperative quality improvement literature (2014) (12)
- Qualitative study of candidacy and access to secondary mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) (12)
- Organising services for influenza vaccination for older people (2004) (12)
- Screening for breast cancer with mammography (2001) (12)
- Primary care quality and safety systems in the English National Health Service: a case study of a new type of primary care provider (2014) (11)
- Defending Rights or Defending Privileges? (2011) (10)
- Challenges in making standardisation work in healthcare: lessons from a qualitative interview study of a line-labelling policy in a UK region (2019) (10)
- Unblinding following trial participation: Qualitative study of participants’ perspectives (2013) (10)
- Multimethod study of a large-scale programme to improve patient safety using a harm-free care approach (2016) (10)
- Uncovering, creating or constructing problems? Enacting a new role to support staff who raise concerns about quality and safety in the English National Health Service (2020) (10)
- The friends and family test: a qualitative study of concerns that influence the willingness of English National Health Service staff to recommend their organisation (2014) (10)
- Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians’ Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature (2020) (9)
- How not to waste a crisis: a qualitative study of problem definition and its consequences in three hospitals (2019) (9)
- Referral and attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic: qualitative study of women’s views (2006) (8)
- Estimating preventable hospital deaths: the authors reply (2017) (8)
- Ethnography as a methodological descriptor: the editors' reply (2016) (8)
- What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks? (2021) (8)
- Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error? (2011) (7)
- Changing the narratives for patient safety (2017) (7)
- Why women consent to surgery, even when they don't want to: a qualitative study (2006) (7)
- Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees? (2009) (7)
- Referral and attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic: a qualitative study of women’s views (2006) (7)
- Consent to tissue banking for research: qualitative study and recommendations (2012) (7)
- The role of the informal and formal organisation in voice about concerns in healthcare: A qualitative interview study. (2021) (7)
- Participating in primary care research. (2002) (7)
- qualitative study of patients and parents have a potentially life threatening chronic illness : Managing communication with young people who (2003) (7)
- IMproving the practice of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate MOnitoring with cardiotocography for safer childbirth (the IMMO programme): protocol for a qualitative study (2019) (6)
- Operational failures and how they influence the work of GPs: a qualitative study in primary care (2020) (6)
- Can we tell whether hospital care is safe? (2014) (6)
- Training in the use of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring with cardiotocography: systematic review and meta‐analysis (2020) (6)
- Subject positions in research ethics committee letters: a discursive analysis (2009) (6)
- When Counting Central Line Infections Counts (2013) (6)
- Patient removals from GPs' lists. (1999) (6)
- Removal from a GP's list: qualitative research is needed (2001) (5)
- The production of printed consumer health information: order from chaos? (2000) (5)
- Style Matters: An Analysis of 100 Research Ethics Committee Decision Letters (2008) (5)
- Defending Rights or Defending Privileges?: Rethinking the ethics of research in public service organizations (2011) (5)
- Regulating research, regulating professionals (2010) (5)
- Why do systems for responding to concerns and complaints so often fail patients, families and healthcare staff? A qualitative study. (2021) (4)
- Interpreting change: the role of qualitative research in evaluating interventions in chronic respiratory disease (2007) (4)
- Need for ethical framework to guide mass testing for asymptomatic covid-19 (2020) (4)
- How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a framework and a case study of its application (2021) (4)
- An ethnographic study of improving data collection and completeness in large-scale data exercises (2019) (4)
- University of Birmingham Conducting a critical interpretive review of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006) (4)
- Developing an ethical framework for asymptomatic COVID-19 testing programmes in higher education institutions (2021) (4)
- Collaboration-Based Approaches (2022) (4)
- Correction to: Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods (Journal of Health Services Research and Policy (2007) 12, (42-47)) (2008) (4)
- What is the right approach to infection prevention and control for children living at home with invasive devices? (2016) (4)
- Three Observations for Improving Efforts in Surgical Quality Improvement. (2022) (3)
- Reporting of The CONSORT extension for Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomised Trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018) (3)
- Governing health services research: is it working? (2010) (3)
- Experiences of NHS Mental Healthcare Workers During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study (2021) (3)
- A decade after Francis: is the NHS safer and more open? (2023) (3)
- A content analysis of contributory factors reported in serious incident investigation reports in hospital care. (2022) (2)
- Learning from maternity service failures at East Kent Hospitals (2022) (2)
- What GPs do and what gets in their way: a mixed-methods study (2021) (2)
- Systematic literature reviewing (2008) (2)
- Evidence : Overcoming challenges to improving quality (2012) (2)
- Psychological interventions for people with psychotic experiences: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) (2)
- Identifying how GPs spend their time and the obstacles they face: a mixed-methods study (2021) (2)
- Influences on patient safety in intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring with cardiotocography (iSafe): protocol for a systematic scoping review (2020) (2)
- Optimising Surgical Safety Checklist implementation: Key lessons for practitioners and partners (2015) (2)
- Age Criteria for Cervical Screening in England: Qualitative Study of Women’s Views (2010) (2)
- Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. (2022) (2)
- Visual identifier systems for patients with cognitive impairment in healthcare settings: A survey of practice in UK hospitals (2022) (2)
- The struck-off mystery (1999) (2)
- Getting Women to Hospital Is Not Enough (2006) (2)
- Re: Training in the use of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring with cardiotocography: systematic review and meta‐analysis (2021) (1)
- A qualitative study of design stakeholders' views of developing and implementing a registry-based learning health system. (2020) (1)
- Women’s views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of a pilot trial comparing Colposuspension to Anterior Repair & TVT (2010) (1)
- Families’ experiences of central-line infection in children: a qualitative study (2022) (1)
- What counts as a voiceable concern in decisions about speaking out in hospitals: A qualitative study (2022) (1)
- Reporting Behaviour Change Interventions: the Tidier Interdisciplinary Checklist of the Minimum Recommended Information (2014) (1)
- Building a culture of openness across the healthcare system: From transparency through learning to improvement?: Interim summary report: progress and early findings. (2018) (1)
- Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service (2022) (1)
- Keystone, matching Michigan, and bacteremia zero. (2014) (1)
- Developing, validating and consolidating the doctor-patient relationship. (1998) (1)
- Correction to: How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a frame work and a case study of its application (2021) (1)
- A qualitative study of participants’ views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank (2017) (1)
- Concordance of Hospital Ranks and Category Ratings Using the Current Technical Specification of US Hospital Star Ratings and Reasonable Alternative Specifications (2022) (1)
- CARPET1 trial Women's views and experiences of a patient preference trial in surgery: a qualitative study of the (2013) (1)
- Coproducing healthcare service improvement for people with common mental health disorders including psychotic experiences: a study protocol of a multiperspective qualitative study (2018) (1)
- Lining Up : How is harm measured ? (2013) (1)
- A qualitative study of the dynamics of access to remote antenatal care through the lens of candidacy. (2023) (0)
- Author's Reply (2005) (0)
- Written information for treating minor illness. Authors did not consider patients' view of information they received. (2001) (0)
- Quality of Life and Childhood Disability – a qualitative study into quality of life for children with cerebral palsy aged 8 – 12 years (2005) (0)
- Principles of Authorship and Good Practice Tips (2016) (0)
- Accountability of individual practitioners; can patients be consumers? (2001) (0)
- Introduction: In this issue (2007) (0)
- Reviewer ' s report Title : Including mixed method research in systematic reviews : examples from qualitative syntheses in TB and malaria control (0)
- Faculty of 1000 evaluation for Doing no harm: enabling, enacting, and elaborating a culture of safety in health care. (2011) (0)
- WIDER Working Paper 2017/142-Changing the narratives for patient safety (2017) (0)
- Understanding experiences of childhood cancer: a fresh perspective (2006) (0)
- An ethnographic study of improving data collection and completeness in large-scale data exercises. (2019) (0)
- a qualitative study of women ' s views Choosing and using services for sexual health : and (2001) (0)
- Learning guide: K302 critical practice in health and social care (2001) (0)
- Style matters: an analysis of 100 Research Ethics Committee letters. (2008) (0)
- A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects. (2020) (0)
- Book reviews: Book reviews (2008) (0)
- Reviewer's Report Issues of Informed Consent for Intrapartum Trials: a Proposed Consent Pathway from the Title: Experience of the Release Trial (isrctn13204258) (2005) (0)
- Primary care quality and safety systems in the English NHS : a case study of a new type of primary care provider (2013) (0)
- Can Patching Be Improved in Amblyopia Treatment (2005) (0)
- Governing health services research (2010) (0)
- Detecting the Dodgy Doctor (2010) (0)
- Development and Implementation of an Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator to Guide Antibiotic Management in Late Preterm and Term Neonates (0)
- University of Birmingham The problem with root cause analysis (2017) (0)
- Creating an equitable evidence base for quality and safety in remote antenatal care (2020) (0)
- Between surveillance and subjectification : the developing governance of quality and safety in English hospitals (2015) (0)
- Written information for treating minor illness (2001) (0)
- Randomised evaluation of government health programmes does present a challenge to standard research ethics frameworks (2019) (0)
- Tackling the crisis in general practice (2023) (0)
- Characterising and describing postpartum haemorrhage emergency kits in context: a protocol for a mixed-methods study (2021) (0)
- The social forms and functions of bioethics in the United Kingdom. (2011) (0)
- Mixed‐methods exploration of views on choice in a university asymptomatic COVID‐19 testing programme (2022) (0)
- Response to Kennedy and Farthing (2010) (0)
- Some unanticipated consequences of the implementation of a hospital IT system: learning from a case study (2011) (0)
- Using routine data to improve patient safety (2013) (0)
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. (2009) (0)
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Ambiguities of chronic illness management and challenges to the medical error paradigm. (2008) (0)
- Health Service staff to recommend their organisation The friends and family test : a qualitative study of concerns that influence the willingness of English (2014) (0)
- Repository Problems and promises of innovation (0)
- Making Room for Improvement in Reporting of QI Studies Features Performance Improvement (0)
- Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework (2022) (0)
- Lay beliefs about immunisation may affect immunisation uptake (2003) (0)
- The Impact of Central-Line Infections on Children and Families (2018) (0)
This paper list is powered by the following services:
Other Resources About Mary Dixon-Woods
What Schools Are Affiliated With Mary Dixon-Woods?
Mary Dixon-Woods is affiliated with the following schools: