Valerie Hans

Q: What Schools Are Affiliated With Valerie Hans

Valerie Hans is affiliated with the following schools: University of Delaware, Cornell University

Valerie Hans's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings

Valerie Hans

Law

#2922

World Rank

#3652

Historical Rank

International Law

#1360

World Rank

#1628

Historical Rank

law Degrees

Download Badge

Why Is Valerie Hans Influential?

(Suggest an Edit or Addition)

According to Wikipedia, Valerie Hans is the Charles F. Rechlin Professor of Law at Cornell Law School and the editor of the Annual Review of Law and Social Science. She is trained as a social scientist, and her major areas of study are the jury system, jury reform, and the application of social science to law.

(See a Problem?)

Valerie Hans's Published Works

Number of citations in a given year to any of this author's works

Total number of citations to an author for the works they published in a given year. This highlights publication of the most important work(s) by the author

Published Works

Judging the Jury. (1987) (145)
Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing (1989) (110)
American Juries: The Verdict (2007) (85)
Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven & Zeisel's The American Jury (2004) (82)
An Analysis of Public Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense (1986) (75)
Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberations of Simulated Juries (1976) (71)
Training in Law and Psychology: Models from the Villanova Conference (1997) (65)
Jurors' Evaluations of Expert Testimony: Judging the Messenger and the Message (2003) (61)
Jurors' Judgments of Business Liability in Tort Cases: Implications for the Litigation Explosion (1992) (60)
Jury Systems Around the World (2008) (54)
Business on Trial: The Civil Jury and Corporate Responsibility (2000) (52)
John Hinckley, Jr. and the Insanity Defense: The Public's Verdict (1983) (49)
Citizen Comprehension of Difficult Issues: Lessons from Civil Jury Trials (1991) (46)
A Jury of One: Opinion Formation, Conformity, and Dissent on Juries (2009) (41)
Science in the Jury Box: Jurors’ Comprehension of Mitochondrial DNA Evidence (2011) (40)
Media Coverage of Law (1991) (39)
Social science and the Courts (1991) (38)
Crossing boundaries : traditions and transformations in law and society research (1998) (37)
Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand: The Effect of a Prior Criminal Record on the Decision to Testify and On Trial Outcomes (2007) (36)
Permitting Jury Discussions During Trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform (2000) (34)
Representation through Participation: A Multilevel Analysis of Jury Deliberations (2011) (33)
Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities (2007) (32)
To Dollars from Sense: Qualitative to Quantitative Translation in Jury Damage Awards (2011) (31)
Judges, Juries, and Scientific Evidence (2007) (29)
Perceptions of Civil Justice: The Litigation Crisis Attitudes of Civil Jurors (1994) (27)
Public opinion of forensic psychiatry following the Hinckley verdict. (1984) (25)
Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials (2004) (25)
The Jury's Response to Business and Corporate Wrongdoing (1989) (25)
"Plain crazy:" lay definitions of legal insanity. (1984) (24)
Can Jury Trial Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence (2006) (20)
Law and the media (1990) (20)
The Gist of Juries: Testing a Model of Damage Award Decision Making. (2015) (20)
The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: The View of Trial Participants, Judges, and Jurors (1999) (20)
The American Jury at Twenty-Five Years (1991) (19)
Nullification at Work? A Glimpse from the National Center for State Courts Study of Hung Juries (2003) (18)
What's Half a Lung Worth? Civil Jurors' Accounts of Their Award Decision Making (2000) (18)
The Hung Jury : The American Jury ’ s Insights and Contemporary Understanding * (2003) (17)
Introduction: Lay Participation in Legal Decision Making (2003) (16)
Avoid Bald Men and People with Green Socks - Other Ways to Improve the Voir Dire Process in Jury Selection (2003) (14)
The Role of Amicus Curiae Briefs (1991) (14)
The Delaware Death Penalty: An Empirical Study (2012) (13)
Japan's New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action? (2010) (13)
The Illusions and Realities of Jurors' Treatment of Corporate Defendants (1998) (13)
Citizens as Legal Decision Makers: An International Perspective (2007) (13)
The Timing of Opinion Formation by Jurors in Civil Cases: An Empirical Examination (2000) (12)
Procedural justice theory and public policy: An exchange (2017) (12)
Deliberation and Dissent: 12 Angry Men versus the Empirical Reality of Juries (2007) (12)
Deliberative Democracy and the American Civil Jury (2014) (11)
Empirical Research and Civil Jury Reform (2003) (11)
Recent Evaluative Research on Jury Trial Innovations (2004) (11)
The French Jury at a Crossroads (2011) (11)
Jurors' Views of Civil Lawyers: Implications for Courtroom Communication (1993) (10)
The Conduct of Voir Dire: A Psychological Analysis (1986) (10)
The Psychology of Tort Law (2016) (10)
Victim Gender and the Death Penalty (2014) (10)
Attitudes Toward Corporate Responsibility: A Psycholegal Perspective (1990) (10)
Gender, Law, and Justice (2002) (10)
Undergraduate Education in Legal Psychology (1999) (10)
The Death Penalty: Should the Judge or the Jury Decide Who Dies? (2014) (10)
The Contested Role of the Civil Jury in Business Litigation (1996) (9)
Trial by Jury: Story of a Legal Transplant (2017) (9)
Jury Decision Making (1992) (8)
The effects of sex-role attitudes and group composition on men and women in groups (1985) (8)
The Verdict on Juries (2008) (8)
The Predictability of Juries (2010) (8)
Numeracy in the jury box: Numerical ability, meaningful anchors, and damage award decision making (2020) (7)
Juries, Lay Judges, and Trials (2013) (6)
How Juries Decide Death: The Contributions of the Capital Jury Project (1995) (6)
Science in the Jury Box: Jurors' Views and Understanding of Mitochondrial DNA Evidence (2007) (6)
After the Crash: Citizens' Perceptions of Connective-Tissue Injury Lawsuits (2007) (6)
Book Notes: Effects of Corroboration Instructions in a Rape Case on Experimental Juries (1977) (6)
Legal Interpreter for the Jury: The Role of the Clerk of the Court in Spain (2016) (6)
Methodological issues in the evaluation of “experiments” with cameras in the courts (1982) (6)
Intersections of race, ethnicity, and the law (1994) (6)
Faking It? Citizen Perceptions of Whiplash Injuries (2008) (5)
Panel One: What Empirical Research Tells Us, and What We Need to Know About Juries and the Quest for Impartiality (1991) (5)
The Relation Between Punitive and Compensatory Awards: Combining Extreme Data With the Mass of Awards (2006) (5)
Introduction to Juries and Lay Participation: American Perspectives and Global Trends (2015) (5)
U.S. Jury Reform: The Active Jury and the Adversarial Ideal (2002) (5)
Editors' Introduction to Judgment by the Numbers: Converting Qualitative to Quantitative Judgments in Law (2011) (5)
Inside the Black Box: Comment on Diamond and Vidmar (2001) (5)
Inside the Jury Room (1986) (5)
Trial by Numbers (2017) (5)
Jury selection in two countries: a psychological perspective (1982) (5)
The Twenty-First Century Jury: Worst of Times or Best of Times? (2007) (5)
What's It Worth? Jury Damage Awards as Community Judgments (2014) (5)
Whiplash: Who's To Blame? (2003) (5)
How Much Justice Hangs in the Balance? A New Look at Hung Jury Rates (1999) (4)
Reflections on the Korean Jury Trial (2014) (4)
Whipped by Whiplash? The Challenges of Jury Communication in Lawsuits Involving Connective Tissue Injury (2000) (4)
From Meaning to Money: Translating Injury Into Dollars (2018) (4)
The Death Penalty in Delaware: An Empirical Study (2008) (4)
Global juries: A plan for research. (2017) (4)
The impact of victim participation in Saiban-in trials in Japan: Insights from the American jury experience * (2014) (4)
Improving Judge & Jury Evaluation of Scientific Evidence (2018) (3)
Jury Jokes and Legal Culture (2013) (3)
Special Feature: The Future of Lay Adjudication in Korea and Japan (2012) (3)
Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand (2007) (2)
Testing Jury Reforms (2005) (2)
The jury system : contemporary scholarship (2006) (2)
Judgements Of Responsibilities For Disaster Consequences (1994) (2)
What Difference Does a Jury Make? Table of Contents (2013) (2)
Cameras in the Courts: Can We Trust the Research? (1983) (2)
Jury Competence: Twelve People of Average Ignorance? (1986) (2)
Empowering the Active Jury: A Genuine Tort Reform (2008) (1)
The impact of minimal versus extended voir dire and judicial rehabilitation on mock jurors’ decisions in civil cases. (2021) (1)
Contextual Effects on Responsibility Judgments (1994) (1)
Psychology in Court. (1987) (1)
Capital Jurors as the Litmus Test of Community Conscience for the Juvenile Death Penalty (2004) (1)
Jury Deliberations: The Road to a Verdict (2006) (1)
Victim Gender and the Death Penalty Caisa (2014) (1)
Mr. Prejudice or Miss Sympathy: A Thirteenth Juror? (1986) (1)
"Speaking Rights": Evaluating Juror Discussions During Civil Trials (2002) (1)
The New “Science” of Jury Selection (1986) (1)
The Evolution of the American Jury (1986) (1)
Canadian Jury Research: The Contributions of Anthony N. Doob (2013) (1)
Trial by Jury, the Legitimacy of the Courts, and Crime Control (2019) (1)
Expert witnessing: social science in court. (1989) (1)
The Twenty-First Century Juror - the Worst of Times or the Best of Times (2011) (1)
Obedience, Justice, and the Law PS reviews recent contributions to a field ripe for new research efforts by psychological scientists: Judgments of Justice (1992) (1)
DO BLACK INJURIES MATTER?: IMPLICIT BIAS AND JURY DECISION MAKING IN TORT CASES (2020) (1)
The War with the Law (1986) (0)
Jury Research Ethics and the Integrity of Jury Deliberations (2015) (0)
A Worldwide Survey of Lay Participation in Legal Decision-Making (2009) (0)
An Empirical Examination of Civil Voir Dire: Implications for Meeting Constitutional Guarantees and Suggested Best Practices (2020) (0)
Hannah Arendt (2017) (0)
Juror Bias is a Special Problem in High-Profile Trials (2005) (0)
Foreword (2018) (0)
Jurors’ Views of Rape: Anger and Ambivalence (1986) (0)
A survey of interdisciplinary differences in attitudes and morale within a psychiatric hospital (1985) (0)
Jurors and Juries (2008) (0)
Introduction to Juries and Mixed Tribunals Across the Globe: New Developments, Common Challenges and Future Directions (2016) (0)
PRELIMINARY PAPER #218 (1994) (0)
CHAPTER 4: Stateless Persons (1933-1941) (2004) (0)
Today and Tomorrow: A Summary View and Judgment (1986) (0)
Global Perspectives on Lay Participation in Legal Decisions: (571212013-127) (2014) (0)
Implicit Racial Bias and Tort Case Decisions (2018) (0)
Science on Trial (2021) (0)
Accounting for Awards: An Examination of Juror Reasoning behind Pain and Suffering Damage Award Decisions (2020) (0)
A Jury of Peers—But from an Unbiased Community (1986) (0)
How Far Will Runaway Juries Go • Jury Reform : What We Need and Why (2013) (0)
Who's to Blame? (1997) (0)
Do Jurors Hear the Oven Bird’s Song? (2018) (0)
Year Paper Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials (2006) (0)
Training in Law and Psychology (2019) (0)
Judicial Meat and Potatoes. (1987) (0)
Lay Participation in Legal Decision Making: Introduction to Law & Policy Special Issue (2003) (0)
Tort Law and Commonsense Justice: Convergence and Divergence. (2017) (0)
Gentlewomen of the Jury (2022) (0)
Guiding jurors’ damage award decisions: Experimental investigations of approaches based on theory and practice. (2022) (0)
The Impact of Minimal versus Extended Voir Dire and Judicial Rehabilitation on Mock Jurors' Decisions in Civil Cases (2020) (0)
From Trial by Ordeal to Trial by Jury (1986) (0)
Diminishing Support for the Death Penalty (2018) (0)
Iron fist in a velvet glove? Judicial behavior in mixed courts (2016) (0)
Internationalizing psychology and law. (1990) (0)
The Jury and the Executioner (1986) (0)
Science & the Legal System (2018) (0)
Mad or Bad? Juries and the Defense of Insanity (1986) (0)
Juries and Mixed Tribunals Across the Globe: New Developments, Common Challenges and Future Directions (2015) (0)
Procedural Roles (2019) (0)
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT JURORS ’ REACTIONS TO EXPERTS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY ? (2006) (0)
Death in Delaware: Judges, Juries, and Race (2007) (0)
Reasoned Verdicts: Oversold? (2018) (0)
A Worldwide Perspective on Lay Participation (2021) (0)
Court Review: Volume 41, Issue 1-Recent Evaluative Research on Jury Trial Innovations (2019) (0)
Part IV: Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors and Organized Labor: Four Perspectives of Corporate Citizenship (2001) (0)
8-1-2003 Empirical Research and Civil Jury Reform (2013) (0)
Chapter Five. Juries as Conduits for Culture? (2020) (0)
The Jury's Political Role: "To See With Their Own Eyes" (1985) (0)
Exploring Judge-Jury Differences in Trial Decisionmaking (2006) (0)
The U.S. Women’s Jury Movements and Strategic Adaptation: A More Just Verdict (2014) (0)
Challenges to Achieving Fairness in Civil Jury Selection (2021) (0)
Introduction (2021) (0)
1-1-2008 Jury Systems Around the World (2013) (0)
Contextualizing Jury Participation: Case-, Jury-, and Juror-Level Predictors of Participation in Jury Deliberations (2009) (0)
Too Young for the Death Penalty: An Empirical Examination of Community Conscience and the Juvenile Death Penalty from the Perspective of Capital Jurors (2004) (0)
Dignity Takings, Dignity Restoration: A Tort Law Perspective (2017) (0)
Diverging Decisions: A Comparison of Jury Verdict Procedures (2018) (0)
Six versus Twelve, All versus Some (1986) (0)
ILR Impact Brief - Evidence, Police Credibility, and Race Affect Juror First Votes (2006) (0)
Virtual Juries (2021) (0)
Jury Selection: Eliminating Some of the Peers (1986) (0)

This paper list is powered by the following services:

Other Resources About Valerie Hans

en.wikipedia.org

What Schools Are Affiliated With Valerie Hans?

Valerie Hans is affiliated with the following schools: