Why Is Cordelia Fine Influential?
According to Wikipedia , Cordelia Fine is a Canadian-born British philosopher, psychologist and writer. She is a Full Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at The University of Melbourne, Australia. Fine has written three popular science books on the topics of social cognition, neuroscience, and the popular myths of sex differences. Her latest book Testosterone Rex won the Royal Society Science Book Prize, 2017. She has authored several academic book chapters and numerous academic publications. Fine is also noted for coining the term 'neurosexism'.
Cordelia Fine's Published Works
Number of citations in a given year to any of this author's works
Total number of citations to an author for the works they published in a given year. This highlights publication of the most important work(s) by the author
2000 2010 2020 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 Published Papers Delusions of gender : how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference (406) Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions (278) Who’s messing with my mind? (237) Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation (173) Delusions of Gender : The Real Science Behind Sex Differences (104) Mental impairment, moral understanding and criminal responsibility: psychopathy and the purposes of punishment. (92) Delusions of Gender (90) Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up? (80) Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it? (74) The cognitive and emotional effects of amygdala damage (59) Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex (55) Is There Neurosexism in Functional Neuroimaging Investigations of Sex Differences? (45) Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash (42) Internalism and the evidence from Psychopathy and "Acquired Sociopaths" (42) Explaining, or Sustaining, the Status Quo? The Potentially Self-Fulfilling Effects of ‘Hardwired’ Accounts of Sex Differences (38) Will Working Mothers’ Brains Explode? The Popular New Genre of Neurosexism (33) From Scanner to Sound Bite (31) “Why Does all the Girls have to Buy Pink Stuff?” The Ethics and Science of the Gendered Toy Marketing Debate (26) Why Does Workplace Gender Diversity Matter? Justice, Organizational Benefits, and Policy (25) Damned If You Do; Damned If You Don't: The Impasse in Cognitive Accounts of the Capgras Delusion (22) Testosterone Rex: Myths of Sex, Science, and Society (21) The role of fetal testosterone in the development of "the essential difference" between the sexes : some essential issues (17) Women's value: beyond the business case for diversity and inclusion (16) Sex, Drugs, and Reckless Driving (15) Sex-Linked Behavior: Evolution, Stability, and Variability (14) Why Males ≠ Corvettes, Females ≠ Volvos, and Scientific Criticism ≠ Ideology: A Response to “Equal ≠ The Same: Sex Differences in the Human Brain” by Larry Cahill in Cerebrum (13) Neurosexism in Functional Neuroimaging: From Scannerto Pseudo-science to Psyche (11) From Scanner to Sound Bite: Issues in Interpreting and Reporting Sex Differences in the Brain (11) Journal of neuroscience research policy on addressing sex as a biological variable: Comments, clarifications, and elaborations (9) Sex-Linked Behavior: Evolution, Stability, and Variability. (9) Could there be an empirical test for internalism (8) Expanding the Role of Gender Essentialism in the Single-Sex Education Debate: A Commentary on Liben (7) Not seeing the wood for the imaginary trees. Or, who’s messing with our article? (7) Feminist science: who needs it? (7) Neuroscience, Gender, and “Development To” and “From”: The Example of Toy Preferences (6) Sex and power: Why sex/gender neuroscience should motivate statistical reform (6) Promiscuous Men, Chaste Women and Other Gender Myths. (5) Expectation violations and emotional learning. (5) The Explanation Approach to Delusion (5) Constructing unnecessary barriers to constructive scientific debate: A response to Buss and von Hippel (2018). (3) Biology or balderdash (1) Buyer Beware: What educators need to know about what neuroscience can't tell them (1) Is testosterone the key to sex differences in human behaviour (1) Who is responsible for the protection of children? Implicit and explicit interpretations of marketing messages (0) Fairly Criticized, or Politicized? Conflicts in the Neuroscience of Sex Differences in the Human Brain. (0) Visual disability and libraries: the promise of the electronic library (0) Reliable and Unreliable Judgments About Reasons (0) The Porn Ultimatum: The Dehumanising Effects of Smut (0) The vagina dialogues: When it comes to libido, testosterone is overrated (0) The Role of Fetal Testosterone in the Development of the âEssential Differenceâ Between the Sexes (0) Moving past the myth of a simple biological difference between the sexes (0) In My View - Can we be gender-blind? (0) Computations in extraversion (0) Session F - Debunking the pseudo-science behind ‘boy brains’ and ‘girl brains’ (0) No cloak of objectivity (0) More Papers This paper list is powered by the following services:
Other Resources About Cordelia Fine What Schools Are Affiliated With Cordelia Fine? Cordelia Fine is affiliated with the following schools:
What Are Cordelia Fine's Academic Contributions? Cordelia Fine is most known for their academic work in the field of psychology. They are also known for their academic work in the fields of and literature.
Cordelia Fine has made the following academic contributions:
Cordelia Fine's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings