David Moher
Epidemiologist
David Moher's AcademicInfluence.com Rankings

Download Badge
Medical
Why Is David Moher Influential?
(Suggest an Edit or Addition)According to Wikipedia, David Moher is an Irish epidemiologist and senior scientist in the Clinical Epidemiology Program at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , where he is also Director of the for Journalology, and the Canadian EQUATOR Centre. He is also an associate professor and University Research Chair at the University of Ottawa. An expert on systematic reviews in medical science, he played a major role in the development of both the PRISMA and CONSORT statements. He is a co-editor-in-chief of the peer-reviewed journal Systematic Reviews. He has been recognised as an ISI Highly Cited Researcher, and received the Grimes Research Career Achievement Award from OHRI in 2015.
David Moher's Published Works
Published Works
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (2010) (41666)
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009) (32445)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009) (24017)
- The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011) (21564)
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009) (20340)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement (2009) (19605)
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. (2000) (17470)
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) (17108)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015) (15601)
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009) (13688)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (2009) (11776)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015) (9535)
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018) (9142)
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. (2009) (7631)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials (2010) (6599)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2016) (5353)
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014) (5227)
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999) (4735)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (4451)
- Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011) (4355)
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (4153)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (4149)
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017) (3919)
- The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001) (3830)
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (3790)
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015) (3720)
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. (2009) (3700)
- SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2013) (3679)
- Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007) (3653)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010) (3478)
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. (1996) (3429)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (2009) (3428)
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001) (3409)
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998) (3217)
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001) (3146)
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013) (3035)
- PRISMA statement. (2011) (2896)
- Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (2009) (2834)
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. (2001) (2451)
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2003) (2329)
- The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015) (2291)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020) (2160)
- Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. (2008) (2118)
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. (2010) (2066)
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015) (1966)
- A comparison of direct vs. self‐report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review (2007) (1832)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative (2003) (1667)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. (2013) (1608)
- Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. (2014) (1606)
- Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008) (1523)
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement (2018) (1474)
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (2000) (1353)
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) (1336)
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. (1995) (1319)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003) (1311)
- The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003) (1305)
- CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (1253)
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014) (1144)
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004) (1135)
- Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. (2001) (1034)
- The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (2013) (1026)
- Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011) (1007)
- The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. (2003) (980)
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014) (940)
- A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2010) (924)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement (2013) (909)
- Improving the quality of reports of meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000) (888)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2004) (883)
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012) (871)
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010) (843)
- Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. (2010) (830)
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012) (822)
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006) (818)
- Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. (2013) (810)
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007) (796)
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2021) (788)
- The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012) (751)
- Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. (2007) (744)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (739)
- CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. (2017) (736)
- Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000) (728)
- Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000) (703)
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001) (694)
- SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015) (688)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. (2013) (688)
- CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. (2017) (667)
- CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. (2010) (663)
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (2021) (662)
- Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. (2009) (652)
- Addressing Reporting Biases (2008) (647)
- CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010) (647)
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) (617)
- The prevalence of celiac disease in average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: a systematic review. (2005) (615)
- Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. (2012) (614)
- A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015) (607)
- Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2012) (594)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2019) (569)
- How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007) (569)
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2020) (562)
- Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012) (548)
- Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. (1998) (537)
- Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996) (534)
- Hypothermia therapy after traumatic brain injury in children. (2008) (534)
- The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: a systematic review. (2005) (522)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. (2003) (517)
- GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) (513)
- Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. (1994) (509)
- An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. (2009) (508)
- Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement (2006) (508)
- Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement (2009) (494)
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008) (485)
- STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009) (482)
- Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. (2008) (480)
- Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012) (479)
- Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: Current Issues and Future Directions (1996) (472)
- What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000) (470)
- STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. (2015) (467)
- PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity (2012) (465)
- The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. (2014) (464)
- GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) (462)
- The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. (2003) (458)
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016) (452)
- How efficacious and safe is short-acting methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. (2001) (424)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. (2013) (419)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. (2010) (419)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) (414)
- Erratum to: “CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials” [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63(8):e1–37] (2012) (412)
- The CARE Guidelines: Consensus‐Based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (2013) (406)
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010) (364)
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999) (354)
- Prolonged therapeutic hypothermia after traumatic brain injury in adults: a systematic review. (2003) (345)
- Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement (2016) (334)
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016) (323)
- Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening? (2016) (320)
- Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices (2011) (316)
- Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors for Primary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2007) (316)
- An international registry of systematic-review protocols (2011) (315)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. (2013) (306)
- Metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. (2015) (303)
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017) (302)
- A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. (1994) (299)
- Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010) (297)
- A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus. (2005) (293)
- Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT statement. (2010) (289)
- Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments (2007) (286)
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003) (285)
- STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. (2015) (277)
- Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension (2020) (275)
- The Use of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review Prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2007) (274)
- The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines (2015) (272)
- Oral Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors and Hormonal Treatments for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2009) (272)
- Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation (2014) (269)
- Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019) (263)
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension (2020) (263)
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. (2001) (258)
- Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017) (255)
- Reporting Guidelines for Health Care Simulation Research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE Statements (2016) (253)
- A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data. (2006) (251)
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008) (237)
- CONSORT: an evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. (1998) (235)
- Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018) (231)
- Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense (2012) (227)
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts (2008) (226)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. (2003) (223)
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020) (211)
- Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? (2009) (208)
- SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols (2013) (206)
- Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM (2000) (205)
- A randomized trial of aspirin on the risk of embolic events in patients with infective endocarditis. (2003) (204)
- The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE) (2018) (199)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020) (199)
- Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008) (198)
- The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013) (197)
- Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary. (2005) (196)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) (196)
- The efficacy of folic acid and folinic acid in reducing methotrexate gastrointestinal toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis. A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. (1998) (195)
- Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2016) (194)
- EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research (2008) (192)
- The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trials (2017) (192)
- Association of Convalescent Plasma Treatment With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (2021) (190)
- Redundancy, disaggregation, and the integrity of medical research (1996) (190)
- The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013) (186)
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals’ endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014) (185)
- Advanced Vertebral Fracture Among Newly Diagnosed Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of the Canadian Steroid‐Associated Osteoporosis in the Pediatric Population (STOPP) Research Program (2009) (184)
- Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: Explanation and elaboration. (2006) (184)
- Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials (2020) (184)
- AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. (2010) (182)
- [The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA]. (2016) (179)
- Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012) (178)
- Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017) (177)
- Acupuncture in Poststroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials (2010) (174)
- Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps (2016) (172)
- Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017) (169)
- Community-based injury prevention interventions. (2000) (167)
- Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards (2012) (165)
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2019) (163)
- Management of intermittent claudication with pentoxifylline: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (1996) (161)
- La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016) (161)
- The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001. (2005) (158)
- The art and science of knowledge synthesis. (2011) (157)
- Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis (1998) (156)
- When and how to update systematic reviews. (2008) (155)
- CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials (2018) (155)
- All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more (2015) (154)
- How Science Takes Stock: the Story of Meta-analysis (1998) (154)
- The Medical Review Article Revisited: Has the Science Improved? (1999) (152)
- Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative. (2003) (150)
- [Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide]. (2016) (149)
- The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. (2003) (149)
- Bisphosphonate therapy for children and adolescents with secondary osteoporosis. (2007) (148)
- Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET) (2016) (147)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2007) (147)
- The Good Clinical Practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical research (2005) (146)
- Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started. (1998) (146)
- Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension (2018) (143)
- Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation : a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. (2001) (143)
- Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian. (2014) (143)
- Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research (2008) (142)
- Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine (2018) (142)
- Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016) (139)
- Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction (2014) (139)
- The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement: A Systematic Review (2006) (138)
- CONSOLIDATED HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION REPORTING STANDARDS (CHEERS) STATEMENT (2013) (136)
- Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: II. How did the authors find the studies and assess their quality? (1998) (135)
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A concern for standards;. (1995) (134)
- Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? (2003) (134)
- Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. (2011) (132)
- Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012) (131)
- Interprofessional collaboration within Canadian integrative healthcare clinics: Key components. (2009) (131)
- Prevalent vertebral fractures among children initiating glucocorticoid therapy for the treatment of rheumatic disorders (2010) (130)
- Incident vertebral fractures among children with rheumatic disorders 12 months after glucocorticoid initiation: A national observational study (2012) (129)
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement. (2016) (128)
- The effectiveness of glucocorticoids in treating croup: meta-analysis (1999) (127)
- Nebulized budesonide and oral dexamethasone for treatment of croup: a randomized controlled trial. (1998) (124)
- Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklists. (2011) (122)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses [ressource électronique]: the PRISMA statement (2009) (121)
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. (2000) (121)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2003) (120)
- Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group (2020) (117)
- A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals (2002) (114)
- Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond (2012) (111)
- Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions (2017) (110)
- CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration. (2017) (108)
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021) (108)
- CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs (2010) (107)
- Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy for Acute Lung Injury in Preclinical Animal Models: A Systematic Review (2016) (106)
- Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017) (106)
- [Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement (Chinese version)]. (2010) (106)
- Shorter courses of parenteral antibiotic therapy do not appear to influence response rates for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis: a systematic review (2002) (106)
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015) (105)
- An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall (2006) (105)
- Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement. (2009) (105)
- PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility (2013) (104)
- Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016) (104)
- STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009) (104)
- You are invited to submit… (2015) (103)
- STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) – an extension of the STROBE statement (2009) (103)
- Systematic reviews: when is an update an update? (2006) (103)
- Male erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a systematic review (2006) (102)
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Preclinical Studies (2017) (101)
- Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances: The CONSERVE 2021 Statement. (2021) (100)
- Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions (2013) (100)
- What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. (2018) (99)
- Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement (2010) (98)
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of amoxicillin for clinically diagnosed acute otitis media in children 6 months to 5 years of age (2005) (98)
- Reporting scoping reviews - PRISMA ScR extension. (2020) (97)
- Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review (2017) (97)
- Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study (2002) (97)
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use by Pediatric Specialty Outpatients (2013) (96)
- Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014 (2016) (95)
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Incidence of Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis (2004) (95)
- Fertility following spinal cord injury: a systematic review (2005) (94)
- Comparative efficacy of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2015) (94)
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration. (2015) (93)
- A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients (2005) (93)
- Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials (2013) (93)
- [CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration]. (2008) (92)
- A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews. (2007) (92)
- How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO (2014) (91)
- The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement (2014) (91)
- A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity. (2016) (90)
- Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020) (89)
- The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013) (89)
- Benefits and harms associated with the practice of bed sharing: a systematic review. (2007) (89)
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed (2019) (88)
- The Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research (2016) (86)
- Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the society for pediatric research meeting: an example of publication bias. (2002) (86)
- The Long-term Gastrointestinal Functional Outcomes Following Curative Anterior Resection in Adults With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2011) (85)
- Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA (2014) (85)
- Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies: The ClinPK Statement (2015) (85)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) (85)
- Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2015) (84)
- Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Combination Therapy and Monotherapy for Dyslipidemia (2009) (84)
- Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. (2008) (84)
- Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014) (83)
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration (2015) (83)
- Systematic review of the benefits and harms of calcitriol and alfacalcidol for fractures and falls (2008) (81)
- Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. (2008) (81)
- Assessing the Quality of Reports of Systematic Reviews: The QUOROM Statement Compared to Other Tools (2008) (81)
- Registering systematic reviews (2010) (81)
- Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine (2002) (81)
- Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2003) (80)
- Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews (2013) (79)
- A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. (1992) (78)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) (78)
- An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. (2016) (77)
- Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study. (2009) (76)
- Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond (2004) (76)
- Declaration of transparency for each research article (2013) (75)
- Surveying physicians to determine the minimal important difference: implications for sample-size calculation. (1999) (75)
- Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review. (2008) (75)
- How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018) (74)
- Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation (2011) (74)
- Issues related to the conduct of systematic reviews: a focus on the nutrition field. (2008) (74)
- Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines (2016) (73)
- The problem of duplicate systematic reviews (2013) (72)
- Declaración SPIRIT 2013: definición de los elementos estándares del protocolo de un ensayo clínico* (2015) (72)
- Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement (2009) (71)
- Is There a “Best” Way to Detect and Minimize Publication Bias? (2001) (71)
- Is staging beneficial for Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy? A systematic review. (2010) (71)
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials (2008) (71)
- Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019) (70)
- Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: III. How did the authors synthesize the data and make their conclusions? (1998) (70)
- The prevalence and impact of pain after day-care tubal ligation surgery (1989) (69)
- Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the nonmedical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review (2014) (69)
- From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature (2011) (68)
- Evaluating mesenchymal stem cell therapy for sepsis with preclinical meta-analyses prior to initiating a first-in-human trial (2016) (68)
- Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analyses (2017) (68)
- Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews (2016) (67)
- Correspondence2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010) (67)
- Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review (2007) (67)
- Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting. (2014) (66)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews* (2021) (65)
- Bone Morbidity and Recovery in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Six‐Year Prospective Cohort Study (2018) (65)
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized trials in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine (2002) (65)
- Evaluating the benefits of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infections in children: a systematic review. (2000) (64)
- Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice. (2010) (64)
- The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies. (2009) (64)
- SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) (2014) (64)
- Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey (2010) (63)
- CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration. (2017) (63)
- The EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research through the use of reporting guidelines (2008) (63)
- Randomized controlled trials in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine: Where can they be found? (2003) (62)
- Cigarette smoking and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. (1993) (62)
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. (2020) (62)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials (2010) (61)
- Stop Predatory Publishers Now: Act Collaboratively (2016) (61)
- Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research. (2015) (60)
- LGM (Vena Tech) vena caval filter: experience at a single institution. (1994) (60)
- Sign Language and Spoken Language for Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review (2016) (59)
- How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? (2015) (59)
- Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. (2019) (59)
- Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the non-medical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review protocol (2012) (59)
- No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews. (2008) (59)
- Cervical carcinoma in women aged 34 and younger. (1986) (59)
- Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. (2018) (59)
- Methotrimeprazine versus meperidine and dimenhydrinate in the treatment of severe migraine: a randomized, controlled trial. (1991) (59)
- Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey (2009) (59)
- Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement. (2008) (58)
- Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review (2012) (58)
- Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations: A Perspective (2009) (57)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) (57)
- Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology. (2004) (57)
- Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021) (57)
- Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers Caring for Patients with Filovirus Disease: A Rapid Review (2015) (56)
- Corrigendum to: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery 2010;8:336–341 (2010) (56)
- Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature (2015) (55)
- Skeletal findings in children recently initiating glucocorticoids for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome (2012) (55)
- [CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version)]. (2010) (54)
- Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol (2021) (54)
- Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CONSORT for TCM) (For Solicitation of Comments) (2007) (54)
- Low molecular weight heparins versus unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes. (2003) (54)
- Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials conducted in Japan: evaluation of adherence to the CONSORT statement. (2009) (54)
- Setting the RECORD straight: developing a guideline for the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected Data (2013) (54)
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019) (53)
- Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey (2012) (53)
- Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers (2007) (52)
- An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist. (2009) (52)
- The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration (2013) (52)
- CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomised trial * (2010) (51)
- CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (Traditional Chinese Version) (2017) (51)
- The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2015) (50)
- Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico (2005) (50)
- For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine. (2005) (50)
- [The CONSORT statenent: Revised Recommendations For Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials]. (2005) (50)
- Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) for traditional Chinese medicine: current situation and future development (2011) (50)
- Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020) (49)
- Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. (2017) (49)
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum, Synovial, and Tissue Testing for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review (2019) (49)
- Effectiveness and safety of short-stay units in the emergency department: a systematic review. (2015) (49)
- Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part I: clinical trial design and methodology. (2006) (49)
- Interprofessional collaboration within integrative healthcare clinics through the lens of the relationship-centered care model (2011) (48)
- [The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement]. (2016) (48)
- A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study. (2016) (48)
- Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations (2020) (48)
- Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018) (47)
- Incidence, causes, and consequences of preventable adverse drug reactions occurring in inpatients: A systematic review of systematic reviews (2018) (47)
- A collaborative effort to apply the evidence-based review process to the field of nutrition: challenges, benefits, and lessons learned. (2007) (46)
- Performance of Post‐retained Single Crowns: A Systematic Review of Related Risk Factors (2017) (46)
- Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data (2017) (46)
- An evaluation of the completeness of safety reporting in reports of complementary and alternative medicine trials (2011) (46)
- Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2019) (45)
- Turning a blind eye:Testing the success of blinding and the CONSORT statement (2004) (45)
- EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. (2008) (45)
- Poor Reporting of Scientific Leadership Information in Clinical Trial Registers (2008) (44)
- Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study (2017) (43)
- Metrics reloaded: Pitfalls and recommendations for image analysis validation (2022) (43)
- The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days. (2020) (43)
- Intravesical oxybutynin for children with poorly compliant neurogenic bladder: a systematic review. (2008) (42)
- Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study (2018) (42)
- Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews. (2012) (42)
- Oral sildenafil citrate (viagra) for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of harms. (2009) (41)
- STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts (2017) (41)
- Comparative safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2015) (41)
- Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis. (2018) (40)
- Consequences of testing for celiac disease. (2005) (40)
- Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness? (2016) (40)
- Reporting the findings of clinical trials: a discussion paper. (2008) (40)
- Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating (2003) (39)
- Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement (2017) (39)
- Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge. (2013) (39)
- Hypothermia Pediatric Head Injury Trial: The Value of a Pretrial Clinical Evaluation Phase (2006) (39)
- Reporting quality of life in clinical trials: a CONSORT extension (2011) (39)
- Effects of a medical team coordinator on length of hospital stay. (1992) (39)
- Adult CSF total protein upper reference limits should be age-partitioned and significantly higher than 0.45 g/L: a systematic review (2019) (39)
- Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews. (2005) (38)
- Chronic Care Model Decision Support and Clinical Information Systems Interventions for People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review (2012) (37)
- A surveillance system to assess the need for updating systematic reviews (2013) (37)
- Issues relating to selective reporting when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions (2013) (37)
- Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part II: control group design. (2006) (37)
- The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. (2013) (37)
- Bibliometric and content analysis of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field specialized register of controlled trials (2013) (37)
- Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials (2013) (36)
- Blinded versus unblinded assessments of risk of bias in studies included in a systematic review. (2011) (36)
- A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. (2015) (36)
- How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals (2017) (36)
- Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (2021) (36)
- Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program. (2011) (36)
- Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015 (2016) (36)
- CONSORT extension for the reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE): checklist with explanation and elaboration (2021) (36)
- Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research (2014) (35)
- A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: Stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline (2014) (35)
- How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial (2007) (35)
- Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial (2016) (35)
- Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency (2016) (35)
- Pharmacological management of intermittent claudication: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. (2000) (35)
- Effect of point of care information on inpatient management of bronchiolitis (2007) (35)
- Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014) (35)
- Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately. (2020) (35)
- Protocol for the development of a CONSORT-equity guideline to improve reporting of health equity in randomized trials (2015) (34)
- What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018) (34)
- A systematic review of how studies describe educational interventions for evidence-based practice: stage 1 of the development of a reporting guideline (2014) (34)
- Das CONSORT Statement: Überarbeitete Empfehlungen zur Qualitätsverbesserung von Reports randomisierter Studien im Parallel-Design (2004) (34)
- Financial Conflicts of Interest Checklist 2010 for clinical research studies (2010) (34)
- When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist (2020) (34)
- Peer review of statistics in medical research. Reporting power calculations is important. (2002) (33)
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of olanzapine as an adjunctive treatment for anorexia nervosa in adolescent females: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2008) (33)
- A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews (2012) (33)
- Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 Reporting Guideline: the Perspectives of Systematic Review Authors (2013) (33)
- A review of interventions triggered by hepatitis A infected food-handlers in Canada (2006) (33)
- The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: an updated review (2011) (33)
- Pharmacological Management of Intermittent Claudication (2000) (32)
- Protocol for development of the guideline for reporting evidence based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET) statement (2013) (32)
- Updating Systematic Reviews (2007) (32)
- Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cells in preclinical models of acute lung injury: a systematic review protocol (2014) (32)
- Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the effect of differing definitions. (1992) (32)
- Decreased coronary sinus oxygen content: a predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with severe congestive heart failure. (1991) (32)
- The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research (2015) (32)
- Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2008) (32)
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers (2012) (31)
- Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part IV: applying a revised CONSORT checklist to measure reporting quality. (2006) (31)
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of existing pharmacologic therapies in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (2019) (31)
- Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part III: quality control of Chinese herbal medicine used in randomized controlled trials. (2006) (31)
- Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline. (2019) (31)
- Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (2019) (30)
- A Critical Analysis of the ‘UGC-Approved List of Journals’ (2018) (30)
- Screening for depression in women during pregnancy or the first year postpartum and in the general adult population: a protocol for two systematic reviews to update a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2019) (30)
- Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines (2017) (30)
- Transient elastography for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis: a systematic review of economic evaluations (2017) (30)
- Investigator experiences with financial conflicts of interest in clinical trials (2011) (30)
- CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (Traditional Chinese Version). (2017) (29)
- Survey of the Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation (2013) (29)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2003) (29)
- Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data (2018) (29)
- Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022) (29)
- Reporting Random Controlled Trials of Herbal Medicines (2006) (29)
- A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019) (29)
- Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials (2013) (28)
- DEFINING RAPID REVIEWS: A MODIFIED DELPHI CONSENSUS APPROACH (2016) (28)
- Randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions underreport important details of the intervention. (2011) (28)
- The effectiveness and safety of emergency department short stay units: a rapid review (2012) (28)
- A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals (2015) (28)
- Developing integrative primary healthcare delivery: adding a chiropractor to the team. (2008) (28)
- Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews (2017) (28)
- How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews? (2011) (27)
- Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias (2012) (27)
- Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis (2014) (27)
- A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI (2021) (27)
- Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers (2019) (26)
- The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement (2021) (26)
- Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative. (2017) (26)
- An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs) (2013) (26)
- Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021) (26)
- Allocation concealment in clinical trials. (2002) (26)
- Measuring the performance of the Cochrane library. (2012) (26)
- Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2008) (26)
- How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221] (2006) (26)
- Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT) (2018) (26)
- Assessing Harms When Comparing Medical Interventions (2008) (25)
- Practitioners' validation of framework of team-oriented practice models in integrative health care: a mixed methods study (2010) (25)
- Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration (2021) (25)
- Measuring the quality of breast cancer care in women. (2004) (25)
- Characteristics of Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery From 2008 to 2020 (2021) (25)
- Chiropractic care of musculoskeletal disorders in a unique population within Canadian community health centers. (2007) (25)
- CONSORT 2010 comments (2010) (25)
- Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol (2012) (25)
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2019) (25)
- Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritis. (2009) (24)
- A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2010) (24)
- Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum: development of a new tool for systematic reviews. (2017) (24)
- Is This Conference for Real? Navigating Presumed Predatory Conference Invitations. (2017) (24)
- An empirical study using permutation-based resampling in meta-regression (2012) (24)
- Therapies for bruxism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (protocol) (2017) (24)
- Transparently reporting adverse effects of traditional Chinese medicine interventions in randomized controlled trials. (2008) (24)
- Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit (2016) (24)
- Academic criteria for appointment, promotion and rewards in medical research: where's the evidence? (2016) (24)
- A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of blood markers, synovial fluid, and tissue testing in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) (2015) (23)
- Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. (2019) (23)
- Identifying Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews: A Comparison of Two Methods (2011) (23)
- Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016) (23)
- CONSORT 2010: AktualisierteLeitlinie für Berichte randomisierter Studienim Parallelgruppen-Design (2011) (23)
- Bevorzugte Report Items fürsystematische Übersichten und Meta-Analysen: Das PRISMA-Statement (2011) (22)
- Appropriately selecting and concisely reporting the outcome measures of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine. (2008) (22)
- [Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures]. (2005) (22)
- Reporting genetic association studies: the STREGA statement (2009) (22)
- Searching for Controlled Trials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Comparison of 15 Databases (2011) (22)
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines (2021) (22)
- Improving the Clarity and Transparency of Reporting Health Research: a Shared Obligation and Responsibility (2008) (22)
- Research Reporting Guidelines in Dentistry: A Survey of Editors. (2016) (22)
- Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study (2019) (22)
- Anticipatory nausea and/or vomiting. (1984) (22)
- Seeing the forests and the trees—innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: a protocol (2014) (21)
- Registering CIHR-funded randomized controlled trials: a global public good (2004) (21)
- Development of a combined database for meta‐epidemiological research (2010) (21)
- Nebulized Budesonide and Oral Dexamethasone for Treatment of Croup: A Randomized Controlled Trial (1999) (21)
- Special articleThe PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMALa extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA☆☆☆☆☆☆ (2016) (21)
- Harms of outcome switching in reports of randomised trials: CONSORT perspective (2017) (21)
- Adult CSF total protein: Higher upper reference limits should be considered worldwide. A web-based survey (2019) (21)
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: implementing the CONSORT statement [corrected]. (2006) (21)
- Impact of the CONSORT Statement endorsement in the completeness of reporting of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry. (2017) (21)
- Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes (2013) (21)
- Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual: Simera/Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual (2014) (20)
- Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los ensayos clínicos aleatorio controlados. Recomendaciones del grupo de trabajo CONSORT (1998) (20)
- Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews (2010) (20)
- Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis (2019) (19)
- STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement. (2009) (19)
- [Table, Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program]. (2013) (19)
- Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding (2020) (19)
- Funders’ data-sharing policies in therapeutic research: A survey of commercial and non-commercial funders (2020) (19)
- Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) (2019) (19)
- Putting patients at the heart of health-care research (2015) (19)
- Ionescu-Shiley valve failure. I: Experience with 125 standard-profile explants. (1992) (19)
- Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonpharmacological Treatments (2011) (18)
- Diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasonography strategies for deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) (18)
- Comparative effectiveness of monotherapies and combination therapies for patients with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analyses (2013) (18)
- An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors’ perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals (2017) (18)
- Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2006) (18)
- Expediting evidence synthesis for healthcare decision-making: exploring attitudes and perceptions towards rapid reviews using Q methodology (2016) (17)
- Surveillance and Identification of Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews: Implementation and Early Experience (2013) (17)
- Extensión PRISMA-Equidad 2012: guías para la escritura y la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas enfocadas en la equidad en salud (2013) (17)
- Ionescu-Shiley valve failure. II: Experience with 25 low-profile explants. (1992) (17)
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials Evaluating Herbal Interventions: Implementing the CONSORT Statement (2008) (17)
- Medical journal requirements for clinical trial data sharing: Ripe for improvement (2021) (17)
- Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST) (2016) (17)
- Disclosure of Investigators' Recruitment Performance in Multicenter Clinical Trials: A Further Step for Research Transparency (2011) (17)
- CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in dentistry. (2020) (17)
- Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomised controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations (2020) (17)
- Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: la responsabilidad de los autores, revisores, editores y patrocinadores (2010) (17)
- Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology. (2015) (17)
- Re: Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Chiang LM. Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. Spine 2005; 30: 1477-84. (2006) (16)
- Measurement Properties of Questionnaires Assessing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review (2012) (16)
- Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol) (2013) (16)
- Definition and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results from a Canadian survey. (1994) (16)
- CONSORT statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials (1997) (16)
- Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research (2015) (16)
- Heparin versus placebo for acute coronary syndromes. (2008) (16)
- Das RECORD-Statement zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden (2016) (16)
- Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol (2017) (16)
- Comparison of topical Xylocaine with placebo as a local anesthetic in colposcopic biopsies. (1991) (16)
- The need for new guidelines to improve the reporting of trials in child and adolescent mental health. (2013) (16)
- Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Review Protocols (2011) (16)
- Do sugar-sweetened beverages cause adverse health outcomes in adults? A systematic review protocol (2014) (16)
- Celiac disease. (2004) (16)
- Metformina para la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis (2005) (16)
- Why Cochrane should prioritise sharing data (2018) (15)
- Education in Health Research Methodology: Use of a Wiki for Knowledge Translation (2013) (15)
- CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (Simplified Chinese Version) (2017) (15)
- Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo. (1992) (15)
- A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2017) (15)
- Survey of whether general practitioners carry aspirin in their doctor's bag (1994) (14)
- Sexuality and reproductive health following spinal cord injury. (2004) (14)
- Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review (2020) (14)
- Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study (2006) (14)
- PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research (2016) (14)
- Evaluating comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions adjunctive to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorder: A systematic review with network meta-analyses (2020) (14)
- Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey. (2019) (14)
- What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses (2021) (14)
- Comparison of physical interventions, behavioral interventions, natural health products, and pharmacologics to manage hot flashes in patients with breast or prostate cancer: protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses (2015) (14)
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2020) (14)
- Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) (2020) (14)
- [Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide]. (2016) (14)
- Peer review of statistics in medical research [2] (multiple letters) (2002) (14)
- The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence (2021) (13)
- Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial (2020) (13)
- Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review (2021) (13)
- PNS154 THE PRISMA 2020 STATEMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF AND KEY CHANGES IN AN UPDATED GUIDELINE FOR REPORTING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES (2020) (13)
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2020) (13)
- Do health care institutions value research? A mixed methods study of barriers and facilitators to methodological rigor in pediatric randomized trials (2012) (13)
- Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. (2012) (13)
- Benefits and Harms Associated With the Practice of Bed Sharing (2007) (13)
- Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) (13)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative (2003) (13)
- Journal impact factor, trial effect size, and methodological quality appear scantly related: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) (13)
- Protocols, probity, and publication (2009) (13)
- Declaración de transparencia: un paso hacia la presentación completa de artículos de investigación (2016) (13)
- Citation Impact was Highly Variable For Reporting Guidelines of Health Research: A Citation Analysis. (2020) (13)
- Improving transparency of scientific reporting to increase value and reduce waste in mental health research. (2016) (13)
- Summary of Glaucoma Diagnostic Testing Accuracy: An Evidence-Based Meta-Analysis (2016) (13)
- Resources for authors of reports of randomized trials: harnessing the wisdom of authors, editors, and readers (2011) (13)
- Do sugar-sweetened beverages cause adverse health outcomes in children? A systematic review protocol (2014) (13)
- Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews (2021) (12)
- Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs among infants and children exposed in utero or during breastfeeding: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014) (12)
- Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project (2020) (12)
- The PRISMA Extension Statement (2015) (12)
- Clinical-trial registration: a call for its implementation in Canada. (1993) (12)
- Metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus (2000) (12)
- Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review (2015) (12)
- 2011 Canadian Journal of Anesthesia Guide for Authors (2011) (12)
- Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting (2009) (12)
- How to Develop a Reporting Guideline (2014) (12)
- Acute stroke: evaluation and treatment. (2005) (12)
- Development and Implementation of the Standards for Evaluating and Reporting Epidemiologic Studies on Chronic Disease Incidence or Prevalence (2013) (12)
- ‘Allocation concealment’: the evolution and adoption of a methodological term (2018) (12)
- National Evaluation of Policies on Individual Financial Conflicts of Interest in Canadian Academic Health Science Centers (2008) (12)
- Declaración de transparencia para las publicaciones científicas (2014) (12)
- A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior (2021) (11)
- Review conclusions by Ernst and Canter regarding spinal manipulation refuted (2006) (11)
- Critical appraisal of clinical studies in Chinese herbal medicine. (2006) (11)
- Comparative Effectiveness of Lipid-Modifying Agents (2009) (11)
- Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process (2020) (11)
- Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combinations of lipid-modifying agents and high-dose statin monotherapy (2009) (11)
- Retraction of COVID-19 Pharmacoepidemiology Research Could Have Been Avoided by Effective Use of Reporting Guidelines (2020) (11)
- A decision tool for updating Cochrane reviews (2008) (11)
- Institutional financial conflicts of interest policies at Canadian academic health science centres: a national survey (2010) (11)
- Reporting of health equity considerations in cluster and individually randomized trials (2020) (11)
- Commentary: Time to improve the reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials. (2021) (11)
- Taking an integrated knowledge translation approach in research to develop the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: an observational study (2019) (10)
- Verslaglegging van diagnostisch evaluatieonderzoek volgens een standaardmethode; de 'Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy' (STARD) (2003) (10)
- A review of five cardiology journals found that observer variability of measured variables was infrequently reported. (2008) (10)
- A comparison between expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and plasma tetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis access. (1993) (10)
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction (2009) (10)
- A concept analysis and meta-narrative review established a comprehensive theoretical definition of replication research to improve its use. (2020) (10)
- Immunologic defects following trauma: a delay in immunoglobulin synthesis by cultured B cells following traumatic accidents but not elective surgery. (1990) (10)
- The Influence of Display and Statistical Factors on the Interpretation of Metaanalysis Results by Physicians (2005) (10)
- Subject Matter Experts (2011) (10)
- Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol (2019) (10)
- La Declaración CONSORT: Recomendaciones revisadas para mejorar la calidad de los informes de ensayos aleatorizados de grupos paralelos (2017) (10)
- Systematic reviews in restorative dentistry: discussing relevant aspects. (2019) (10)
- Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis. (2022) (10)
- Curtailing the Use of Preregistration: A Misused Term (2019) (10)
- Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis (2019) (10)
- Operational definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine derived from a systematic search (2021) (10)
- Precise reporting of traditional Chinese medicine interventions in randomized controlled trials. (2008) (10)
- The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days (2020) (9)
- Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials. (2013) (9)
- Completeness of reporting of case reports in high‐impact medical journals (2020) (9)
- Along with the privilege of authorship come important responsibilities (2014) (9)
- Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research (2018) (9)
- Safety, effectiveness, and cost of long-acting versus intermediate-acting insulin for type 1 diabetes: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2013) (9)
- What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses (2019) (9)
- Mitral Valve Clip for Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation: An Evidence-Based Analysis. (2015) (9)
- Author Correction: Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials (2021) (9)
- The transitive property across randomized controlled trials: if B is better than A, and C is better than B, will C be better than A? (2014) (9)
- Celiac Disease: Summary (2004) (9)
- Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors (2020) (9)
- Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? (2017) (9)
- The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol (2013) (9)
- When and how to replicate systematic reviews (2020) (9)
- La propiedad transitiva en los ensayos clínicos controlados: si B es mejor que A y C es mejor que B, ¿C será mejor que A? (2014) (9)
- Anesthesia interventions that alter perioperative mortality: a scoping review (2018) (8)
- Incidence, causes, and consequences of preventable adverse drug events: protocol for an overview of reviews (2016) (8)
- The impact of gender on scientific writing: An observational study of grant proposals. (2021) (8)
- Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. (2022) (8)
- Atherosclerotic risk factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral vascular occlusive disease (1994) (8)
- Identifying stroke therapeutics from preclinical models: A protocol for a novel application of network meta-analysis (2019) (8)
- New guidelines are needed to improve the reporting of trials in addiction sciences. (2013) (8)
- Blinding is better than masking (2007) (8)
- Assessment of safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in preclinical models of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review protocol (2017) (8)
- Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE) (2021) (8)
- Factors predicting completion and time to publication of Cochrane reviews (2009) (8)
- Complementary and alternative medicine in Canadian children: A call for action. (2005) (8)
- Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomised Trials Included in Meta-Analyses: Attitudes, Practice, Evidence and Guides (2001) (8)
- [Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: asking authors, peer reviewers, editors and funders to do better]. (2010) (8)
- [Improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials. Recommendations of the CONSORT Study Group]. (1998) (8)
- EPC Response to IOM Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013) (8)
- Predatory Journals : Do Not Enter (2017) (8)
- Parents are reluctant to use technological means of communication in pediatric day care (2008) (8)
- Pharmaceutical company trials and the integrity of medical research (1996) (7)
- Clinical relevance assessment of animal preclinical research (RAA) tool: development and explanation. (2021) (7)
- Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes. (2016) (7)
- A letter from CMAJ's editorial board to the CMA. (2002) (7)
- Development and Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Understanding of a Quality Checklist: A Randomised Controlled Trial (2007) (7)
- Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized study. (2019) (7)
- Report on a pilot project to introduce a publications officer (2016) (7)
- Protocol for a scoping review to support development of a CONSORT extension for randomised controlled trials using cohorts and routinely collected health data (2018) (7)
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD statement (2001) (7)
- Randomized Trials for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations (2009) (7)
- Comparison of sedation strategies for critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses (2016) (7)
- Interpreting the number needed to treat. (2002) (7)
- Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library (2019) (7)
- Reply to Roberts et al.: CHEERS is Sufficient for Reporting Cost-Benefit Analysis, but May Require Further Elaboration (2014) (7)
- Registering results from clinical trials. (2010) (7)
- CONSORT statement requires closer examination (2002) (7)
- CONSORT and Its Extensions for Reporting Clinical Trials (2020) (7)
- Facilitating clinical research in the 1990s and beyond: challenges facing clinical trial registers (1995) (7)
- Safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2013) (7)
- Impact of Vertebral Fractures and Glucocorticoid Exposure on Height Deficits in Children During Treatment of Leukemia (2018) (7)
- Glucocorticoids for croup. (2000) (6)
- Improving the reporting and usability of research studies (2013) (6)
- Meta-analysis: an adolescent in need of evidence and a watchful eye. (1999) (6)
- 实施临床试验报告规范,提高临床试验透明度 = Practice good publication practice to improve the transparence of clinical trials (2007) (6)
- A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials (2017) (6)
- [Metformin for type-2 diabetes mellitus. Systematic review and meta-analysis]. (2005) (6)
- A protocol for a network meta-analysis of interventions to treat patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (2018) (6)
- Data-sharing and re-analysis for main studies assessed by the European Medicines Agency—a cross-sectional study on European Public Assessment Reports (2022) (6)
- Safety and effectiveness of antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their infants and children: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014) (6)
- Changing research culture towards more use of replication research: A narrative review of barriers and strategies. (2020) (6)
- COVID-19 and the research scholarship ecosystem: help! (2021) (6)
- Doug Altman's legacy to Cochrane and evidence synthesis. (2018) (6)
- Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO (2011) (6)
- Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (2010) (6)
- Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review (2021) (6)
- Ambiguities and Confusions Between Reporting and Conduct (2014) (6)
- Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review (2021) (6)
- Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review (2018) (6)
- Methods for the early detection of drug-induced pancreatitis: a systematic review of the literature (2019) (5)
- Assessment of systematic effects of methodological characteristics on candidate genetic associations (2013) (5)
- Consort Extension for N-Of-1 Trials (Cent) Guidelines (2010) (5)
- The EQUATOR Network: facilitating transparent and accurate reporting of health research (2008) (5)
- An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials (2022) (5)
- Mejora de la calidad de las publicaciones sobre ensayos aleatorizados: colaboración entre autores, revisores y editores (2011) (5)
- A Cross-sectional literature survey showed the reporting quality of multicentre randomised controlled trials should be improved. (2021) (5)
- When to disbelieve the believable. (2002) (5)
- Publication by association: how the COVID-19 pandemic has shown relationships between authors and editorial board members in the field of infectious diseases (2021) (5)
- Comparison of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses (2016) (5)
- Safety, effectiveness, and cost of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate acting insulin for type 2 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2013) (5)
- Evaluating comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for persons receiving opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorder: protocol for a systematic review (2018) (5)
- Reports of randomized trials: ensure they are transparent, accurate, and complete. (2010) (5)
- Effects of medical and non-medical cannabis use in older adults: protocol for a scoping review (2020) (5)
- Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies. (2002) (5)
- Quality of reports of randomised trials and estimates of treatment efficacy (1998) (5)
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2016) (5)
- Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of medicine: a cross-sectional study of the Canadian U15 universities (2021) (5)
- Editors-in-chief perceptions of patients as (co) authors on publications and the acceptability of ICMJE authorship criteria: a cross-sectional survey (2021) (5)
- Checking whether there is an increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and other cancers with specific modern immunosuppression regimens in renal transplantation: Protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies (2014) (5)
- [Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy according to a standard method; the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD)]. (2003) (5)
- Publication by association: the Covid-19 pandemic reveals relationships between authors and editors (2020) (5)
- The effectiveness of glucocorticoids in treating croup: meta-analysis. (1999) (5)
- Reporting the clinical importance of randomized controlled trials. (2002) (5)
- Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study (2022) (5)
- How good are volunteers at searching for published randomized controlled trials? (1995) (5)
- The Challenges of Early Assessment: Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists (2001) (4)
- Ethics methods are required as part of reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare (2022) (4)
- Benefits and obstacles to cell therapy in neonates: The INCuBAToR (Innovative Neonatal Cellular Therapy for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Accelerating Translation of Research) (2021) (4)
- Transparency in Clinical Trials: adding value to Paediatric Dental Research. (2020) (4)
- The Impact of Gender on Researchers' Assessment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2021) (4)
- Training researchers in publication science: Why, what, and how. (2019) (4)
- Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Foot Care in the Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. (2016) (4)
- Metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (Review) (2013) (4)
- The CONSORT Statement. Revised recommendations on improving the quality of reports on parallel-design randomized studies (2005) (4)
- Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis. (2000) (4)
- Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity (2019) (4)
- Reporting and data sharing level for COVID-19 vaccine trials: A cross-sectional study (2022) (4)
- Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: A cross-sectional study. (2021) (4)
- Increasing the evidence base in journalology: creating an international best practice journal research network (2016) (4)
- Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research (2021) (4)
- The Changing Landscape of Journalology in Medicine. (2019) (4)
- Current Issues in Conduct and Reporting of Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Management of Cancer Patients (2020) (4)
- Raloxifene for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures in Postmenopausal Women : A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety Evidence Technology Report (2005) (4)
- Hong Kong Manifesto for Assessing Researchers : Fostering Research Integrity (2019) (4)
- How to assess new treatments. (2001) (4)
- Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Data (RECORD) Initiative (2012) (4)
- How health equity is reported and analyzed in randomized trials (2017) (4)
- Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2022) (4)
- Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research (2020) (4)
- Cervical carcinoma in women aged 34 and younger (1987) (4)
- Vollständiges und präzises Berichten von Studien zur diagnostischen Genauigkeit: Die STARD-Initiative (2011) (4)
- There is room for improvement in the use of scoping reviews in dentistry: Scoping reviews in dentistry. (2022) (4)
- Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get (2013) (4)
- A scoping review of outcome-reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports (2019) (4)
- P05.50. CONSORT extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT) guidelines (2012) (4)
- Commentary: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement: What Neurosurgeons Should Know. (2021) (3)
- Declaration of transparency: A step towards complete reporting of research articles. (2016) (3)
- David Moher, MSc The CONSORT Guidelines: improving the quality of research. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. Interview by Bonnie Horrigan. (2002) (3)
- Do overly complex reporting guidelines remove the focus from good clinical trials? (2021) (3)
- Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project (2020) (3)
- Stress testing journals: a quasi-experimental study of rejection rates of a previously published paper (2019) (3)
- Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (2022) (3)
- Impact of study design on the results of continuation studies of antidepressants. (2008) (3)
- Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers (2022) (3)
- CONSORT-AI and SPIRIT-AI: New Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Trials and Trial Protocols for Artificial Intelligence Interventions (2020) (3)
- Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine (2023) (3)
- Intent to share Annals of Internal Medicine's trial data was not associated with data re-use. (2021) (3)
- Recommendations for including or reviewing patient reported outcome endpoints in grant applications (2021) (3)
- Reporting Transparency and Completeness in Trials: Paper 2 - Reporting of randomised trials using registries was often inadequate and hindered the interpretation of results. (2021) (3)
- Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network Report: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analyses and Economic Evaluation Comparing Therapies for Hypertension in Non-Diabetic Patients (2014) (3)
- Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences: a cross-sectional analysis of 146 universities (2019) (3)
- WITHDRAWN: Metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. (2015) (3)
- Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol (2022) (3)
- Letter to the editor - round table unites to tackle culture change in an effort to improve animal research reporting (2017) (3)
- Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity. (2019) (3)
- [CONSORT: an attempt to improve the quality of publication of clinical trials]. (1998) (3)
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022) (3)
- Issues relating to selective reporting when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions (2013) (3)
- THE CONSORT STATEMENT. AUTHORS' REPLY (1996) (3)
- Introducing the Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Evidence Alliance: a partnership between researchers, patients and health system decision-makers to support rapid-learning and responsive health systems in Canada and beyond (2022) (3)
- A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples. (1993) (3)
- Stop Predatory Publishers Now (2016) (3)
- ‘Nepotistic journals’: a survey of biomedical journals (2021) (3)
- Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records – room for improvement (2021) (3)
- Endorsing and implementing reporting guidelines in journals. (2015) (3)
- Induction of ovulation and ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis (2002) (3)
- Das CONSORT Statement (2005) (3)
- Randomized controlled trials in cancer: improving the quality of their reports will also facilitate better conduct. (1998) (3)
- Tranexamic acid for prevention of bleeding in cesarean delivery: An overview of systematic reviews (2021) (3)
- Nephrotoxicity of ioxaglate and ioversol assessed by glomerular filtration rate: a pilot study. (1996) (3)
- 中国循证医学中心促进中医药现代化的策略 = The strategy of Chinese evidence-based medicine center for promoting the modernization of traditional Chinese medicine (2007) (3)
- PROTOCOL: When and how to replicate systematic reviews (2020) (3)
- Reporting guidelines for journal and conference abstracts. (2020) (2)
- An inclusive and diverse governance structure of the strategy for patient-oriented research (SPOR) Evidence Alliance (2022) (2)
- A comprehensive search string informed by an operational definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine for systematic bibliographic database search strategies (2022) (2)
- Excite – A New Collaborative Model Of Pre-Market Evaluation Of Health Technologies (2013) (2)
- Clinical studies and randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine: A historical and contemporary review (2007) (2)
- [CONSORT statement. Revised findings on quality improvement based on reports from randomized studies in parallel design]. (2005) (2)
- [Declaration of transparency: promoting a more complete, honest and adequate publication of scientific articles]. (2014) (2)
- Characteristics of potential predatory, open access, and subscription-based biomedical journals: a cross sectional comparison (2016) (2)
- Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment (2017) (2)
- Comparative safety of bowel cleansers: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2018) (2)
- Reporting Transparency and Completeness in Trials: Paper 3 - Trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases. (2021) (2)
- Evaluating prospective study registration and result reporting of trials conducted in Canada from 2009-2019 (2022) (2)
- Identifying Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews (2011) (2)
- Erratum: Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology (British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2004) 58:1 (61-65)) (2004) (2)
- Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for post-surgery or chemotherapy patients taking serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2013) (2)
- Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. (2022) (2)
- Screening for prostate cancer: protocol for updating multiple systematic reviews to inform a Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline update (2022) (2)
- Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study (2020) (2)
- The Cochrane Library Oversight Committee. (2011) (2)
- THE REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT FOR REPORTING RANDOMIZED TRIALS: EXPLANATION AND ELABORATION (2001) (PART II) (2010) (2)
- Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update (2021) (2)
- Incorporating equity, diversity, and inclusiveness into the Hong Kong Principles (2021) (2)
- A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: Stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline (2014) (2)
- Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021) (2)
- Apoyo a las guías de publicación para estudios de evaluación económica por parte de las revistas biomédicas españolas (2019) (2)
- Protocol for a scoping review of systematic reviews: benefits and harms of medical marijuana (2018) (2)
- Identifying and understanding factors that affect the translation of therapies from the laboratory to patients: a study protocol. (2020) (2)
- Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project. (2020) (2)
- Helping consumers of healthcare knowledge: Improving the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. (2006) (2)
- Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study (2020) (2)
- Declaración de trasparencia: promoviendo una publicación más completa, honesta y adecuada de los artículos cientítificos (2014) (2)
- Audit of health research funder policies and recommendations on journal publication of research (2017) (2)
- Post-operative surveillance for somatotroph, lactotroph and non-functional pituitary adenomas after curative resection: a systematic review (2022) (2)
- Reporting Guidelines: A Framework for Clarity and Transparency (2018) (2)
- Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for survival in COVID-19: an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials (2020) (1)
- Assessing patient satisfaction in randomized clinical trials: Some design measurement issues (1992) (1)
- Status of sharing of Individual Participant Data from clinical trials, use of shared data and impact of research outputs of sharing data: a scoping review protocol (2018) (1)
- Listening to the Patient Voice Adds Value to Cancer Clinical Trials (2022) (1)
- Protocol for development of the guideline for reporting evidence based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET) statement (2013) (1)
- Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014 (2015) (1)
- Declaration of transparency for each research articlea (2013) (1)
- 2.1. Knowledge synthesis (2013) (1)
- Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018) (1)
- Protocol for Development of a Consensus-Based Reporting Guideline Extension for Pre-Hospital Case Reports (Prehospital-Care) (2021) (1)
- Improving the quality of reporting of RCTs evaluating herbal interventions: implementing the CONSORT statement (2010) (1)
- Association of Accuracy, Conclusions, and Reporting Completeness With Acceptance by Radiology Conferences and Journals (2022) (1)
- La déclaration RECORD-PE (Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data Statement for Pharmacoepdemiology) : directives pour la communication des études realisées à partir de données de santé observationelles collectées en routine en pharmacoépidémiologie (2019) (1)
- Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions are often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis (2021) (1)
- A systematic review of how studies describe educational interventions for evidence-based practice: stage 1 of the development of a reporting guideline (2014) (1)
- Reporting Policies in Neurosurgical Journals: A Meta-Science Study of the Current State and Case for Standardization. (2021) (1)
- Impact of assisted reproduction on the incidence of breast cancer (2004) (1)
- Response to Letter by Ernst and Lee (2010) (1)
- Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review (2015) (1)
- Canadian funders and institutions are lagging on reporting results of clinical trials (2017) (1)
- [Declaration of transparency for scientific publications]. (2014) (1)
- Interpreting the number needed to treat. Author's reply (2002) (1)
- Publishing in 2020: A checklist to support a shift in behaviour to achieve best practice (2019) (1)
- Assessing the quality of information recorded on trial registries (2005) (1)
- Quality Assessment Of Clinical Trials (2007) (1)
- [Endorsement of guidelines for reporting economic evaluation studies by Spanish biomedical journals]. (2019) (1)
- Acupuncture and Related Therapies (2018) (1)
- Reply to letter to the editor by C. Faggion: reproducibility and reporting guidelines. (2018) (1)
- Development of a combined database for meta‐epidemiological research (2011) (1)
- Mejora en la calidad de la presentación de los ensayos controlados y de asignación aleatoria. La declaración CONSORT (1998) (1)
- Social media attention and citations of published outputs from re-use of clinical trial data: a matched comparison with articles published in the same journals (2021) (1)
- The Problems with Systematic Reviews: A Living Systematic Review. (2023) (1)
- La déclaration RECORD (Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data) : directives pour la communication des études réalisées à partir de données de santé collectées en routine (2019) (1)
- 55 SPIRIT-outcomes and CONSORT-outcomes: enhanced trial outcome transparency, less bias, improved systematic reviews, better health (2022) (1)
- Should we consider Embase in Latin America (2004) (1)
- Comparative efficacy and safety of insulin analogs in hospitalized adults. (2015) (1)
- Identifying and understanding factors that affect the translation of therapies from the laboratory to patients: a study protocol (2020) (1)
- Academic Criteria for Promotion and Tenure Within the Faculty of Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study of 170 Universities (2018) (1)
- 19A Assessing the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials: Current issues and future directions (1994) (1)
- The authors respond to “Rigorous policies ensure integrity of NLM literature databases” (2019) (1)
- Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014 (2015) (1)
- Ensuring an Accurate Scientific Record in an Era of Pre-print Servers. (2022) (1)
- CONSORT 系列一: 中医药临床研究报告中应清晰阐述试验设计理念 = CONSORT Serial 1: How to explain the methodological rationale of randomized controlled trial on traditional Chinese medicine? (2008) (1)
- CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomised trials (2023) (1)
- Creating an Audit and Feedback Loop to Monitor and Enhance Data Sharing in Canada (2020) (1)
- Additional file 1: of Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines (2016) (1)
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2020) (1)
- Laser treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the endocervical button. (1990) (1)
- Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs. (2021) (1)
- Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: an international cross-sectional survey (2022) (1)
- A study protocol for the development of a SPIRIT extension for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (SPIRIT-ROUTINE) (2021) (1)
- A systematic review of how studies describe educational interventions for evidence-based practice (2014) (1)
- The pros and cons of social media COVID-19 related news during the pandemic: a systematic review (2020) (1)
- Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher (2022) (1)
- Reflections on medical journals. (2002) (1)
- Online training in manuscript peer review: a systematic review (2022) (1)
- Acute Stroke: Evaluation and Treatment: Summary (2005) (1)
- Reporting randomized trials. (2009) (1)
- InsPECT Development - Draft Checklist Versions (2018) (1)
- Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis (2020) (1)
- Reporting Behaviour Change Interventions: the Tidier Interdisciplinary Checklist of the Minimum Recommended Information (2014) (1)
- The CONSORT Statement-Reply (1996) (1)
- Establishing a core set of open science practices in biomedicine: a modified Delphi study (2022) (1)
- PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcare (2023) (1)
- Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials-Reply (1995) (1)
- Sachwortverzeichnis Band 23, 2000 (2000) (0)
- Bendamustin. Neue Wege bei Lymphomen und soliden Tumoren. Bendamustin-Workshop, Dresden, 2. September 2000 (2000) (0)
- Figure 42, Improved erection without Carson 2004 (GAQ-Q1) (2009) (0)
- zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien , die outinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden he REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected ealth Data ( RECORD ) statement (2016) (0)
- Treatment for otitis media (2005) (0)
- Repository Protocol for development of the guideline for reporting evidence based practice educational interventions and teaching ( GREET ) (2013) (0)
- A survey: technology in a pediatric day care setting (2006) (0)
- 17 – La red EQUATOR: facilitando la comunicación transparente y precisa de la investigación sanitaria* (2010) (0)
- Table 2, Example of a summary table for an update of key questions within comparative effectiveness review (2011) (0)
- Calidad y transparencia de Fisioterapia mediante guías de publicación (2015) (0)
- External validity is neglected in reports of randomized trials The example of hip and knee osteoarthritis (2009) (0)
- Establishing Recency and Updating Needs for Cochrane Reviews on Selected Complementary Medicine Interventions: Study Protocol (2017) (0)
- Development of a reporting guideline for umbrella reviews on epidemiological associations using cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies: the Preferred Reporting Items for Umbrella Reviews of Cross-sectional, Case-control, and Cohort studies (PRIUR-CCC) (2022) (0)
- DECLARACIÓN DE TRANSPARENCIA: PROMOVIENDO UNAPUBLICACIÓN MÁS COMPLETA, HONESTAYADECUADADE LOSARTÍCULOS CIENTÍFICOS (2014) (0)
- CONSORT: un intento de mejorar la calidad de la publicación de ensayos clínicos (1998) (0)
- Convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19 patients: an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2020) (0)
- Manuscript CoordinatorsCoordonnatrices des manuscrits (1997) (0)
- L’enregistrement des essais cliniques ne prévient pas la publication « choisie » des résultats (2009) (0)
- La validité externe est négligée dans les essais randomisés pharmacologiques et non pharmacologiques : l’exemple de l’arthrose de la hanche et du genou (2009) (0)
- StatMost for Windows: Statistical Analysis and Graphics (software). (1995) (0)
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital (2022) (0)
- Reproducibility Policies in Cardiology Journals: The REPLICA Cross-Sectional Study (2022) (0)
- Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials. (2022) (0)
- 44 Trainee Perception of a Point of Care Clinical Evidence Module for Bronchiolitis (2004) (0)
- Figure 1, Flow diagram of the risk of outcome reporting bias and analysis reporting bias assessment process (2013) (0)
- 00 AM-12 : 00 Noon Restoration Eliminate Man-made , Keep God-given parts Dimple-down / Buildup Post-space / Fiberpost Reduce Occlusion Emphasize Need For Coronal Coverage (2017) (0)
- Epidemiological and reporting characteristics of predatory journal articles: protocol (2016) (0)
- Characteristics of Available Reporting Guidelines (2014) (0)
- Reliability Testing of the Developed Checklists (2011) (0)
- Establishing Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Journal Authenticator Tool To Support Health Literacy: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study (2021) (0)
- The BRIGHTER Meta-Research Group (2019) (0)
- Evaluating the Impact of Peer Review on the Completeness of Reporting in Imaging Diagnostic Test Accuracy Research (2022) (0)
- Table 3, Registration and reporting requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act, Section 801a (reprinted with permission from Wood 2009) (2013) (0)
- Predatory journal definition scoping review study (2018) (0)
- Figure 2, Criteria evaluation by the participating experts (2011) (0)
- Assessing topics, geometry and reporting quality of network meta-analyses involving CAM interventions (study protocol) (2016) (0)
- Figure 49, Dyspepsia (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Figure 30, Improved erection (GEQ-Q1) (2009) (0)
- Subject Index Vol. 23, 2000 (2000) (0)
- The equator network: A global initiative to improve reporting of health research studies (2011) (0)
- Table 13, Intracavernosal Injection: Improvement in Erections* (2009) (0)
- Heparin versus placebo for acute coronary syndromes (Review) (2010) (0)
- Table 4, Percentage of publications from MEDLINE in various languages (1996–2011) (2013) (0)
- CONSORT 2010: progress and challenges (2011) (0)
- Within-Trial, Within-Treatment Pooling of Multiple Treatment Group Data (2009) (0)
- Additional file 2: of A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019) (0)
- Research Ethics Board Approval (2018) (0)
- Canadian Multicenter Randomized Trial Propofol vs Midazolam for ICU Sedation : A (2001) (0)
- Figure 51, Withdrawals due to adverse events: patients with diabetes (2009) (0)
- Table 1, Population Characteristics of Studies Measuring Hypogonadism in Men with Erectile Dysfunction (2009) (0)
- NOTICE: This document contains correspondence generated during peer review and subsequent revisions but before transmittal to production for composition and copyediting: (2019) (0)
- Figure 19, Improved erection (GEQ-Q1): major depressive disorder in remission (2009) (0)
- REPORTING RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS. AUTHOR'S REPLY (1995) (0)
- A27 Beta errors revisited (1993) (0)
- STRIP Study Protocol (2016) (0)
- Interventions for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Viral, Fungal, and Bacterial Infections in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematologic Stem Cell Transplant. (2016) (0)
- [Table, Sample Assessment Worksheet]. (2007) (0)
- Evidence based diagnosis of drug-induced pancreatitis: Protocol for a series of reviews related to mechanisms and detection of disease (2017) (0)
- extending the CONSORT statement in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions (2010) (0)
- Table 8, Population Characteristics of Studies Measuring Serum LH/FSH Levels in Men with Erectile Dysfunction (2009) (0)
- Systematic Review of the Association between Serotonin Affinity of Anti-Depressant Agents and the Occurrence of Fractures, Falls, and Bone Mineral Density Change in Patients With Depression (2014) (0)
- Interventions for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Graft versus Host Disease in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (2017). (2016) (0)
- STREGA Reporting Recommendations, Extended from STROBE Statement (2009) (0)
- Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in preclinical animal models of sepsis (2015) (0)
- CoreOutcomeSet-STAndardsforReporting: TheCOS-STARStatement (2016) (0)
- Trial Reports: Improving Reporting, Minimizing Bias, and Producing Better Evidence‐Based Practice (2014) (0)
- Screening and extraction forms (2018) (0)
- A computer generated patient tracking and accrual mechanism for clinical trials (1991) (0)
- Examples of Systematic Reviews with Qualitative Signals for Potentially Invalidating Changes in Evidence (2007) (0)
- Table 3, Prevalence of Hypogonadism in Men with Erectile Dysfunction (serum free or calculated testosterone) (2009) (0)
- Peer Review #1 of "Open Access uptake by universities worldwide (v0.1)" (2020) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C6. Subcutaneous Treatment Trials (2009) (0)
- Figure 25, Successful intercourse attempts: patients with hypertension taking anti-hypertensivedrugs (2009) (0)
- Assessment of systematic effects of methodological characteristics on candidate genetic associations (2012) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table F4. Apomorphine (sublingual) (2009) (0)
- Table B1, General kappa and AC1 statistics: pilot reliability testing of quality assessment of four studies of incidence/prevalence of chronic diseases by seven expert groups (2011) (0)
- Signal Detection Report: Acupuncture for Shoulder Pain (2017) (0)
- Appendix D. Reference List of Excluded Studies (2009) (0)
- Trial registration: a new standard for REBs. (1993) (0)
- Appendix G. Funnel Plots (2009) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C7. Intra-urethral Suppositories (2009) (0)
- Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey (2023) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C9. Testosterone Treatment of ED (2009) (0)
- Relation of the completeness of reporting of rapid reviews to journal publication status: protocol for a comparative, cross-sectional methodological study (2017) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C5. Intracavernousal Injection Trials (2009) (0)
- Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey (2023) (0)
- Correction: Summary of Glaucoma Diagnostic Testing Accuracy: An Evidence-Based Meta-Analysis (2017) (0)
- Promoting the quality and transparency of health research in China. (2022) (0)
- Author Survey Study Documents (2017) (0)
- Figure 14, The mean IIEF-Q3 score: Type I-II diabetes (2009) (0)
- Appendix E. Reference List - Quality Assessment of RCTs (2007) (0)
- Additional file 3: of A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019) (0)
- POS-02.119: Intravesical oxybutynin for children with poorly compliant neurogenic bladders: a Systematic Review (2007) (0)
- Methodological and Reporting Considerations for Systematic Reviews of Nonpharmacological Interventions (2011) (0)
- Improving the qual i ty of randomized control led t rials in Chinese herbal medicine , part III : quali ty control of Chinese herbal medicine used in randomized controlled trials (2006) (0)
- Figure 68, Mean change from baseline in IIEF-EF score (2009) (0)
- EPC Directors’ Summary of Responses to IOM Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013) (0)
- Figure 5, The mean IIEF-Q4 score (2009) (0)
- Improving the qual i ty of randomized control led t rials in Chinese herbal medicine , part I : clinical t rial design and methodology (2006) (0)
- Additional file 1: of A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015) (0)
- Interpreting the number needed to treat [4] (multiple letters) (2002) (0)
- Author ' s response to reviews An alternative to the hand searching gold standard : Validating methodological search filters using Title : relative recall Authors : (2006) (0)
- Reporting of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) manufacturing and characterization in a systematic review of MSC treatment for pre-clinical models of sepsis (2015) (0)
- Correction to: Anesthesia interventions that alter perioperative mortality: a scoping review (2021) (0)
- Comments, Opinions, and Reviews Acupuncture in Poststroke Rehabilitation A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials (2013) (0)
- Table 16, Subcutaneous Injection: Patients with Adverse Events (2009) (0)
- FULL TITLE: What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses. SHORT TITLE: What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses. AUTHORS: (2019) (0)
- Characteristics of bibliometric analyses of the complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine literature: A scoping review protocol (2023) (0)
- Prof. David Moher: Guidelines for Reporting Health Research (A User’s Manual) (2022) (0)
- Figure 24, Improved erection (GEQ-Q1): patients with hypertension taking anti-hypertensive drugs (2009) (0)
- ABSTRACTS: ISoP Annual Conference ‘Joining Forces for Managing Risks’ Liège, Belgium 11–13 October, 2006 (2006) (0)
- Table 18, Intra-urethral Treatment: Improvement in Erections* (2009) (0)
- InsPECT Delphi study (2019) (0)
- Table 23, Testosterone: Improvement in Sexual Intercourse Outcomes (2009) (0)
- Table F-17, [Longer-term outcomes (clinical outcomes, serious...]. (2009) (0)
- Comparison of Conditioning Regimens for Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) (0)
- Providing valid evidence for decision-making: the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network Methods and Applications Group in Indirect Comparisons (DSEN MAGIC) (2022) (0)
- Signal Detection Report: Glucosamine Therapy for Treating Osteoarthritis (2017) (0)
- [Table, Data Abstraction Forms]. (2004) (0)
- Finding evidence to inform the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews of randomized trials (2004) (0)
- Systematic Review Protocols: Interventions Used to Manage Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantantion (2015) (0)
- Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET) (2016) (0)
- Figure 9, Headache (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Implementing Incentives and Rewards to Improve the Research Ecosystem. (2021) (0)
- Quality Assessment for Clinical Trials (2014) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C8. Topical Treatments of ED (2009) (0)
- Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers (2022) (0)
- Table 20, Alprostadil (Topical Cream) vs. Placebo: Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) (2009) (0)
- Appendix F. Quality Assessment (2009) (0)
- Interventions to address potentially inappropriate prescriptions and over-the-counter medication use among adults 65 years and older in primary care settings: protocol for a systematic review (2022) (0)
- Additional file 4: of A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019) (0)
- Commentary: Reporting Guidelines for Studies on Artificial Intelligence: What Neurosurgeons Should Know (2021) (0)
- [Table, I. All 8 Reviews with Signals for “Potentially Invalidating Changes in Evidence” (criteria for signals A1–A3)]. (2007) (0)
- Figure 21, The mean IIEF-Q4 score: major depressive disorder in remission (2009) (0)
- How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals (2017) (0)
- Table 1, Scope of updating and corresponding actions using original or modified search strategy (2011) (0)
- Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations. (2023) (0)
- Reflections on medical journals. Author's reply (2002) (0)
- Forest and Funnel Plots (2009) (0)
- Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis: the REPRISE project (2022) (0)
- CHAPTER 5 Ambiguities and Confusions Between Reporting and Conduct (2014) (0)
- extension of the CONSORT statement Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an (2009) (0)
- Literature Search 2009 Update (August 2008 to May 2009) Including the Update Flow Chart and List of Included and Excluded Records (2009) (0)
- Reproducibility Policies In Cardiology Journals (The REPLICA Study) (2018) (0)
- Erratum to: A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of blood markers, synovial fluid, and tissue testing in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) (2016) (0)
- Drugs Included in the Review and Label Information (2009) (0)
- Table 26, Testosterone Treatment: Patients with Adverse Events (2009) (0)
- Characteristics and Development Methods of Reporting Guidelines for Health Research in the Equator Network Database (2023) (0)
- Figure 10, Flushing (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Appendix A. Search Strategies (2009) (0)
- Reflections on medical journals [5] (multiple letters) (2002) (0)
- A scoping review identifies multiple comments suggesting modifications to SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010. (2023) (0)
- Figure 27, Headache (treatment-related): patients with hypertension taking anti-hypertensive drugs (2009) (0)
- PRISMA Extension for Preclinical In Vivo Animal Experiments (2020) (0)
- Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should (2014) (0)
- Ten (not so) simple rules for clinical trial data-sharing (2023) (0)
- Table 24, Testosterone (T) Combined with PDE-5 inhibitors: Improvement in Sexual Intercourse Outcomes (2009) (0)
- Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review (2023) (0)
- Figure 12, Improved erection (GEQ-Q1): Type I-II diabetes (2009) (0)
- Registration of refugee and asylum-seeking doctors (1998) (0)
- Figure 65, Improved erection (GAQ-Q) (2009) (0)
- CONSORT PRO 2012: translating guidance to practice (2012) (0)
- Sample Assessment Worksheet (2007) (0)
- Is there evidence that megatrials are based on a methodological mistake? (1996) (0)
- Table 14, Intracavernosal Injection: Patients with Adverse Events (2009) (0)
- Happy birthday: we are one year old (2013) (0)
- Reporting of Randomised Trials Reporting of Randomised Trials (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C1. Oral Sildenafil (2009) (0)
- Does the ICMJE guideline for authorship need revising to support and recognize patient partnership? A cross-sectional survey of journal editor-in chief (2021) (0)
- Appendix H. Instruments Used in the Assessment of Treatment Outcomes (2009) (0)
- GRADE Tables, Assessing the Evidence (2009) (0)
- Figure 11, Visual disturbances (all cause) (2009) (0)
- ASO Author Reflections: Current Issues in Conduct and Reporting of Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trials in the Surgical Management of Cancer Patients (2020) (0)
- STRIP Study Publications (2017) (0)
- SPIRIT promotes protocol sharing. (2018) (0)
- 109: Advancing Child Health Research Through Evidence-Based Guidance for Pediatric Clinical Trial Protocols (2015) (0)
- Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (2011) (0)
- Health equity considerations in guideline development: a rapid scoping review (2023) (0)
- Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years (2018) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C2. Oral Vardenafil (2009) (0)
- CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials. (2023) (0)
- Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group (2020) (0)
- Signal Detection Report : Acupuncture for Shoulder Pain Signal Detection (2017) (0)
- Appendix E. Additional Acknowledgments (2009) (0)
- Figure 26, Any adverse event (all cause): patients with hypertension taking anti-hypertensive drugs (2009) (0)
- Figure D1, Informational letter for cognitive function (2011) (0)
- [Figure], Figure 2. Flow of information through eligibility assessment (2007) (0)
- Table 27, Miscellaneous Treatments: Efficacy and Adverse Events (2009) (0)
- [Table, IIEF domains and the scoring]. (2009) (0)
- Figure 55, Serious adverse events (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Signal Detection Report: Mistletoe Therapy in Oncology (2017) (0)
- Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 (2020) (0)
- The Canadian abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment trial (1991) (0)
- Figure 17, Any adverse events (treatment-related): Type II diabetes (2009) (0)
- Table 17, Intra-urethral Treatment: Sexual Intercourse (2009) (0)
- Risk of Parotid Malignant Tumors in Israel ( 1970 – 2006 ) (2010) (0)
- OHRI Publication Guideline (2018) (0)
- Peer Review #1 of "Open Access uptake by universities worldwide (v0.2)" (2020) (0)
- Signal Detection Report: Antioxidant supplements for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and/or steatohepatitis (2017) (0)
- Publication bias (1993) (0)
- Figure 63, Absolute mean change from baseline in IIEF-EF score (2009) (0)
- Vitamin D Supplementation for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Systematic Review (2022) (0)
- Characteristics of systematic reviews published in dentistry by Brazilian corresponding authors (2019) (0)
- Developing a CONSORT Extension for Interventions in Criminology, Education, Psychology, Public Health, and Social Work (2017) (0)
- Figure 8, Any adverse events (treatment-related) (2009) (0)
- Table 4, Characteristics of 14 comparative effectiveness reviews and their updating surveillance assessments (2013) (0)
- Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data (2018) (0)
- Figure 40, Successful intercourse attempts (SEP-Q3) (2009) (0)
- Reporting Randomized Trials. Authors' reply (2009) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C3. Oral Tadalafil (2009) (0)
- Disseminating biomedical research: Predatory journals and practices (2022) (0)
- Figure G-48, [Forest plot of difference in...]. (2009) (0)
- Searches by Clinical Area (2007) (0)
- A cross-sectional analysis identified co-authorship networks and scientific collaboration on reporting guidelines for health research. (2023) (0)
- Meta-analysts search Embase and Medline (2005) (0)
- 1-07-04 The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS). A meta-analysis (1997) (0)
- Table 2, Recommended sources of grey literature for conventional drugs and devices (2013) (0)
- Additional file 1: of A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019) (0)
- Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015 (2016) (0)
- Table 2, Credibility of the checklists to assess quality of observational studies (evaluation by participating experts) (2011) (0)
- Maps to summit location, hotel and dinner (2019) (0)
- Appendix I. List of Unobtained Articles (2009) (0)
- A cross-sectional study of the endorsement proportion of reporting guidelines in 1039 Chinese medical journals (2023) (0)
- Signal Detection Report: Light therapy for non-seasonal depression (2017) (0)
- Table 5, Population Characteristics of Studies Measuring Hyperprolactinemia in Men with Erectile Dysfunction (2009) (0)
- The first author responds (1992) (0)
- Re: Testing for blinding is the only way to determine whether a trial is blind (2018) (0)
- Figure 46, Serious adverse events (2009) (0)
- Search Strategies and Literature Flow (2011) (0)
- Endorsement of guidelines for reporting economic evaluation studies by Spanish biomedical journals: a cross-sectional analysis of “Instructions to Authors” (2018) (0)
- Side Effects and Completion Rates of Treatment Regimens for Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Rapid Review with Network Meta-Analyses (2015) (0)
- Figure 3, The mean IIEF “EF domain” score (2009) (0)
- Summit Meeting Materials (2019) (0)
- Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers (2022) (0)
- STRIP study documents (2017) (0)
- University of Birmingham Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence (2020) (0)
- Figure 39, Successful intercourse attempts (SEP-Q2) (2009) (0)
- Figure 23, The mean IIEF-Q4 score: patients with hypertension taking anti-hypertensive drugs (2009) (0)
- Author Correction: Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed (2019) (0)
- Following Cochrane systematic review protocols to completion ten years later: a cohort study and author survey (2018) (0)
- Table 28, Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) (2009) (0)
- Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards Michael BrundageJane BlazebyDennis RevickiBrenda BassHenrica de Vet • Helen DuffyFabio EfficaceMadeleine KingCindy L. K. LamDavid Moher • Jane ScottJeff SloanClaire SnyderSusan YountMelanie Calvert (2013) (0)
- CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (Simplified Chinese Version). (2017) (0)
- Sample Subject Searches (2007) (0)
- Annals of Internal Medicine - Data sharing and re-use (2018) (0)
- Figure G-38, [Forest plot of LDL-c difference...]. (2009) (0)
- Canadian Surgery Forum. (2010) (0)
- Identifying and understanding factors that affect the translation of therapies from the laboratory to patients: a study protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] (2021) (0)
- Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers (2021) (0)
- Summary of Decisions and Protocol for Resolution in the Event of Difference of Opinion Between EPC Report Authors and AHRQ Officer (2013) (0)
- Growth of the Literature by Clinical Area (2007) (0)
- Table 10, Serious Adverse Events in Sidenafil vs. Placebo (data from RCTs) (2009) (0)
- adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017) (0)
- [Table, IIEF-5 scoring system]. (2009) (0)
- Appendix C. Statistics Information Form (2007) (0)
- Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015 (2016) (0)
- Appendix G. Raw Pooled Data (2004) (0)
- Table B2, General kappa and AC1 statistics: pilot reliability testing of quality assessment of six studies of risk factors of chronic diseases by seven expert groups (2011) (0)
- Rapid antigen-based and rapid molecular tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: a rapid review with network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (2023) (0)
- Figure D3, Informational letter for cardiovascular risk factors (2011) (0)
- Increasing our Return on Investment in Science: Start with better behavior. (2023) (0)
- Analysing the analysis (1997) (0)
- ARE BLOOD PRESSURES COMPARABLE IN GRADED EXERCISE TESTS AND EXERCISE CLASSES (1989) (0)
- Figure 58, Flushing (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Figure 44, Any adverse events (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Clinical trials in urogynecology (2007) (0)
- Standard 2 : Containing Risk of Bias DILEMMA (2012) (0)
- Figure 69, Mean per-patient percent absolute change from baseline in SEP-Q2 (2009) (0)
- Implementing clinical trial data sharing requires training a new generation of biomedical researchers (2023) (0)
- Allocation concealment terminology: origins and evidence (2018) (0)
- Figure 1, Analytic Framework for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction (2009) (0)
- A quasi-experimental study comparing rejection rates of a previously published article across three categories of journals: Study protocol (2018) (0)
- Bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis in children and adolescents without osteogenesis imperfecta (2005) (0)
- [Table], Evidence Table C10. Off Label Treatments (2009) (0)
- The Impact of Gender on Researchers’ Assessment: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) (0)
- Table 2, Ottawa and RAND Method (2013) (0)
- Figure 41, Improved erection (GAQ-Q1) (2009) (0)
- Appendix B. Data Assessment, Data Abstraction and Quality Assessment Forms (2009) (0)
- ·P-32 Issues in the quality of clinical trial protocols (1990) (0)
- DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF THREE ULTRASONOGRAPHY STRATEGIES FOR SUSPECTED DVT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS (2020) (0)
- Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Child and Maternal Health (2005) (0)
- Table 19, Intra-urethral Treatment: Patients with Adverse Events (2009) (0)
- Methods for Identifying Regulatory Information or Safety Alerts (2013) (0)
- Survey and Recruitment (2018) (0)
- Figure 60, Absolute mean change in IIEF-EF score (2009) (0)
- Predatory Journals summit 2019 (2019) (0)
- Table 1, Types of selective outcome and analysis reporting, which may affect the direction and/or magnitude of the reported study findings (2013) (0)
- Systematic review of checklists to detect potential predatory journals (2018) (0)
- [Table, II. Examples of Reviews with Signals for “Major Changes in Evidence” (criteria A4–A7)]. (2007) (0)
- Figure 43, IIEF-EF ≥ 26 at follow up (weeks 10–12) (2009) (0)
- Figure G-59, [Forest and funnel plots with...]. (2009) (0)
- Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers (2022) (0)
- Figure 32, Flushing (all cause) (2009) (0)
- Table 2, Prevalence of Hypogonadism in Men with Erectile Dysfunction (serum total testosterone) (2009) (0)
- Figure 28, Dyspepsia (treatment-related): patients with hypertension taking anti-hypertensive drugs (2009) (0)
- Updating Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (2011) (0)
- STudy Reporting In Predatory journals (STRIP) (2016) (0)
- Predatory Journal Definition Delphi (2019) (0)
- Re-use of trial data in the first 10 years of the data-sharing policy of the Annals of Internal Medicine: a survey of published studies (2020) (0)
- Low molecular weight heparins versus unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes (2001) (0)
- [Improving the quality of randomized trials reports: a collaboration between authors, reviewers and editors]. (2011) (0)
- Table 12, Intracavernosal Injection: Sexual Intercourse Success (2009) (0)
- Examples of “Low,” “Medium,” and “High” Assessments (2013) (0)
- Top health research funders' guidance on selecting journals for funded research. (2021) (0)
- Table 3, Fourteen completed CER topics (2013) (0)
- RE: Authors' reply to Topper and Colleagues - RE: How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2019) (0)
- Pilot testing of the guideline for reporting of evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (greet) (2015) (0)
- Table 25, Testosterone Treatment: Improvement in Erections (2009) (0)
- Table 4, Prevalence of Hypogonadism in Men with Erectile Dysfunction (serum bioavailable testosterone) (2009) (0)
- Definitions and Criteria for Signals for Updating (2007) (0)
- Ensuring the success of data sharing in Canada (2021) (0)
- Summary of Glaucoma Testing Accuaracy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Clinical Studies (2011) (0)
- Figure D2, Informational letter for cancer (2011) (0)
- Band 23, Heft 6, Dezember 2000 (2000) (0)
- Complete Contents Vol. 23, 2000 / Jahresinhalt Band 23, 2000 (2000) (0)
- 24. Chapter 24 (2014) (0)
- Folsaure und folinsaure zur verringerung der methotrexat-nebenwirkungen bei patienten mit rheumatoider arthritis (1999) (0)
This paper list is powered by the following services:
Other Resources About David Moher
What Schools Are Affiliated With David Moher?
David Moher is affiliated with the following schools: