What are the best colleges and universities if, instead of rewarding waste and extravagance, we reward schools for making the best use of their limited resources? Taking our cue from Malcolm Gladwell’s podcast series “The Myths of Meritocracy,” we invented the Academic Stewardship metric to reward schools for making the most of what they have. Specifically, Academic Stewardship asks how effectively schools manage their financial and human resources to gain the influence that makes them academically excellent. Schools that are exemplary in Academic Stewardship are doing everything in their power to help students and faculty achieve their full potential. Evaluated in terms of Academic Stewardship, the big wealthy schools fall by the wayside, whereas less affluent smaller schools that do more with less rise to the top, notably HBCUs.
Colleges and universities deserve to be recognized when they do more with less. It’s impressive when a large wealthy school can spend money lavishly on expensive buildings and programs. But it’s even more impressive when a small school with limited means is able to train and inspire students that the larger wealthier schools tend to ignore.
The American Association of Colleges and Universities reported in late 2021 that almost 75 percent of higher-education professionals at US colleges and universities felt financial constraints prevented their schools from effectively attracting students. Distracted by the size and amenities of larger schools, prospective students tended especially to be overawed by the big research universities.
America’s smaller schools, especially its liberal arts colleges, need effective ways of communicating their value to a world that celebrates “bigger is better” and “you need the best.” Unfortunately, most college ranking companies, such as U.S. News & World Report, define “best” in a way that devalues schools with smaller budgets and fewer students even when these schools do remarkable work in advancing their students’ education. By and large, college rankings penalize schools that serve underserved populations.
Inspired by Malcolm Gladwell, who for years now has criticized conventional college rankings for misrepresenting what’s good and valuable in education, we decided to construct a new ranking metric that highlights those schools that do more with less. That metric—called the Academic Stewardship metric—takes away both the size and the wealth advantage of schools, and focuses instead on how well schools use the resources available to them to advance the education of their students.
As a metric, Academic Stewardship is defined by a precise mathematical formula, which can be found in our Academic Stewardship white paper. Nevertheless, it’s worth giving an overview of the metric here. Measuring Academic Stewardship requires measuring two forms of stewardship: 1) Stewardship of financial resources (using the money they have responsibility without waste) and 2) Stewardship of human resources (doing their best to help students, faculty, and administration to flourish). Together, these two types of stewardship form what we call Academic Stewardship. If you want to learn more about the factors involved in Academic Stewardship, click the more button below.
Academic Stewardship as so defined is connected to keeping tuition and other costs down, but it should not be confused with affordability or frugality. The schools that this metric ranks as exemplary academic stewards tend to be all over the map when it comes to tuition and other costs. At issue is the influence of schools given the financial and human resources they have on hand. If a school is going to charge more for tuition, then that needs to be reflected in the school having proportionately greater influence.
The benefits of attending a school with strong academic stewardship include:
In 2021, Malcolm Gladwell released a series of poignant podcasts about schools that were doing phenomenal work in advancing higher education but that were getting no recognition for it from the standard academic ranking organizations such as U.S. News & World Report. Especially noteworthy among these podcasts were “Project Dillard,” “Lord of the Rankings,” and “My Little Hundred Million.”
What troubled Gladwell is that schools like Dillard University and Reed College could never, given the way college rankings were set up, receive the recognition they deserved. The whole ranking system was rigged against them. Gladwell focused especially on Dillard University, an HBCU in New Orleans. By making its mission to serve underserved populations, Dillard was, in effect, getting penalized by U.S. News & World Report, which puts a premium in its rankings on schools that have a lot of money and spend it lavishly. In fact, the U.S. News rankings have a long history of penalizing schools that focus on making education more accessible to those with little or no money.
Our entire team at AcademicInfluence.com was tasked with listening to Gladwell’s series of podcasts on higher education. Some of us listened to it through the subscription service Scribd.com, which made Gladwell’s series conveniently available in a five-hour audio book titled “The Myths of Meritocracy.” We saw in these podcasts a real challenge to our ranking enterprise, and one that we could not dismiss lightly or simply rationalize away.
At AcademicInfluence.com, we use publicly available databases, such as Semantic Scholar, Crossref, and Wikipedia to measure the influence of academics in their disciplines. Having measured the influence of academic persons, we then identify the schools with which they’re affiliated, adding up the influence scores of the faculty and alumni to measure the influence of the schools and their disciplinary programs. We lay out this methodology in detail on our about pages.
Not surprisingly, rich and large schools have a huge advantage in scoring highly on influence-based rankings. Influence is an asset that people (notably faculty and alumni) confer on the schools with which they’re affiliated. As a result, the bigger wealthier schools have an easier time accumulating such assets and thereby raising their influence scores. In our influence-based rankings of schools, the bigger wealthier schools therefore tend to come out on top.
But not always. In 2020, we invented our Concentrated Influence metric to remove the size advantage of bigger schools, allowing smaller schools to punch above their weight class to compete successfully against larger schools. But Concentrated Influence does not control for wealth. Prompted by Gladwell, we therefore introduced our Academic Stewardship metric to control not just for a school’s size advantage but also for its wealth advantage, thereby gauging to what degree schools are good stewards of their resources.
We invented the Academic Stewardship metric to highlight schools that make the most of their limited resources. In inventing this metric, we didn’t set out to artificially elevate or downgrade any schools. Our aim was to simply give schools credit for doing the best they could given their financial and human resources. Schools are dealt different cards. We wanted our Academic Influence metric to reflect making the most of the cards actually dealt.
What did we find? Simply scan the ranking below to answer that question for yourself. The most obvious thing that leaps out at you is this: Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) crushed it in this ranking. In all the earlier experimental versions of the Academic Stewardship metric that we formulated, including the one we finally settled on, HBCUs kept coming up at the top, with Fisk University in particular dominating the ranking at the #1 spot.
Three HBCUs appear in the top five of this ranking, and five appear in the top fifteen. Dillard University, about which Gladwell did an entire podcast, appears at #14. The recognition that the Academic Stewardship metric gives to HBCUs is remarkable and unanticipated. Yet in hindsight, this stunning performance of HBCUs is also easily explained: HBCUs, underfunded and underappreciated for so many years, have nonetheless, as a matter of pride, striven to do the best they can with what limited resources they have. Our earnest wish is that this Academic Stewardship ranking plays some small part in giving these schools the recognition they deserve.
If you would like to take a deeper dive into the history of HBCUs, check out our article The History of HBCUs in America.
We also take a look at the best HBCUs over the past twenty years in Most Influential HBCUs 2000-2020.
So too, if you are interested in attending an HBCU but aren’t able to attend college on a traditional campus, or you need the flexibility an online school offers, we’ve got you covered:
Tuition + fees
$23K
Acceptance
61%
Graduation
46%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1100/23
Tuition + fees
$53K
Acceptance
75%
Graduation
62%
Student body
<1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Hampshire College
Tuition + fees
$11K
Acceptance
56%
Graduation
34%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
865/18
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Tougaloo College
Tuition + fees
$7K
Acceptance
74%
Graduation
66%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1267/27
See more of notable alumni and faculty from New College of Florida
Tuition + fees
$10K
Acceptance
38%
Graduation
27%
Student body
<1K
Tuition + fees
$14K
Graduation
27%
Student body
<1K
Tuition + fees
$19K
Acceptance
47%
Graduation
65%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1150/23
See more of notable alumni and faculty from William Jewell College
Tuition + fees
$36K
Acceptance
93%
Graduation
65%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1057/24
Tuition + fees
$40K
Acceptance
75%
Graduation
59%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1155/25
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Hollins University
Tuition + fees
$31K
Acceptance
89%
Graduation
44%
Student body
<1K
Tuition + fees
$47K
Acceptance
70%
Graduation
55%
Student body
<1K
Tuition + fees
$16K
Acceptance
79%
Graduation
65%
Student body
<1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Houghton College
Tuition + fees
$55K
Acceptance
67%
Graduation
73%
Student body
1K
Tuition + fees
$19K
Acceptance
55%
Graduation
52%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1030/20
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Dillard University
Tuition + fees
$49K
Acceptance
69%
Graduation
73%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1220/26
Tuition + fees
$61K
Acceptance
10%
Graduation
94%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1530/34
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Harvey Mudd College
Tuition + fees
$23K
Acceptance
76%
Graduation
56%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1025/21
See more of notable alumni and faculty from University of Jamestown
Tuition + fees
$63K
Acceptance
44%
Graduation
73%
Student body
1K
Tuition + fees
$60K
Acceptance
67%
Graduation
68%
Student body
<1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Bennington College
Tuition + fees
$8K
Acceptance
97%
Graduation
55%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1260/26
See more of notable alumni and faculty from New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Tuition + fees
$33K
Acceptance
68%
Graduation
73%
Student body
1K
Tuition + fees
$43K
Acceptance
68%
Graduation
62%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1177/24
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Millsaps College
Tuition + fees
$46K
Acceptance
62%
Graduation
83%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1220/25
Tuition + fees
$41K
Acceptance
75%
Graduation
56%
Student body
1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Georgetown College
Tuition + fees
$59K
Acceptance
4%
Graduation
93%
Student body
2K
Median SAT/ACT
1555/35
Tuition + fees
$33K
Acceptance
84%
Graduation
54%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
985/21
See more of notable alumni and faculty from West Virginia Wesleyan College
Tuition + fees
$25K
Acceptance
93%
Graduation
53%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
995/20
Tuition + fees
$52K
Acceptance
70%
Graduation
75%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1200/26
Tuition + fees
$61K
Acceptance
18%
Graduation
90%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1440/33
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Haverford College
Tuition + fees
$14K
Acceptance
94%
Graduation
42%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
850/15
See more of notable alumni and faculty from virginiai Union University
Tuition + fees
$41K
Acceptance
66%
Graduation
55%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1155/24
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Monmouth College
Tuition + fees
$43K
Acceptance
92%
Graduation
73%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1170/27
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Transylvania University
Tuition + fees
$36K
Acceptance
94%
Graduation
65%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1096/22
Tuition + fees
$40K
Acceptance
95%
Graduation
55%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1105/26
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Eastern Mennonite University
Tuition + fees
$16K
Acceptance
65%
Graduation
16%
Student body
1K
Tuition + fees
$32K
Acceptance
58%
Graduation
40%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1020/20
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Pacific Union College
Tuition + fees
$48K
Acceptance
81%
Graduation
64%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1174/26
Tuition + fees
$50K
Acceptance
84%
Graduation
76%
Student body
1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Washington & Jefferson College
Tuition + fees
$48K
Acceptance
80%
Graduation
62%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1070/21
Tuition + fees
$44K
Acceptance
70%
Graduation
75%
Student body
1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Agnes Scott College
Tuition + fees
$39K
Acceptance
98%
Graduation
63%
Student body
1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Chestnut Hill College
Tuition + fees
$40K
Acceptance
73%
Graduation
63%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1145/26
Tuition + fees
$25K
Acceptance
97%
Graduation
41%
Student body
2K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Trinity Washington University
Tuition + fees
$53K
Acceptance
69%
Graduation
64%
Student body
2K
Median SAT/ACT
1045/23
Tuition + fees
$37K
Acceptance
68%
Graduation
56%
Student body
<1K
Median SAT/ACT
1004/18
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Cazenovia College
Tuition + fees
$49K
Acceptance
74%
Graduation
64%
Student body
1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Ohio Wesleyan University
Tuition + fees
$43K
Acceptance
81%
Graduation
58%
Student body
2K
Median SAT/ACT
1190/25
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Oglethorpe University
Tuition + fees
$31K
Acceptance
58%
Graduation
40%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1050/21
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Friends University
Tuition + fees
$34K
Acceptance
67%
Graduation
32%
Student body
1K
Median SAT/ACT
1000/19
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Rockford University
Tuition + fees
$35K
Acceptance
75%
Graduation
64%
Student body
1K
See more of notable alumni and faculty from Illinois College
At AcademicInfluence.com, we measure the influence of schools. By taking publicly available databases, such as Semantic Scholar and Wikipedia, we can measure the influence of academic persons in their respective disciplines, and then by looking at what schools they’re affiliated with (faculty and alums), we can measure the influence of the schools and their disciplinary programs. All of this we cover in our methodology and related articles.
Go to: The Best Colleges and Universities by Academic Stewardship
Not surprisingly, rich and large schools have a huge advantage in scoring high on influence. Influence can be viewed as an educational asset, and the bigger wealthier schools are in a strong position go acquire a lot of it. But what happens when smaller schools with fewer resources invest in influence wisely and, proportionately, do better in acquiring influence than large wealthy schools? Large wealthy schools have a lot of money to burn in acquiring influence. Academic Stewardship imposes a cost on poor stewardship, rewarding schools not for influence per se but for their effectiveness in acquiring influence with limited means.
Academic Stewardship is getting the most influence for the actual resources on hand. As a ranking metric, it asks how effectively schools use the financial and human resources they have to obtain influence. Academic Stewardship rewards wise stewardship, penalizes waste and extravagance. Cost-effectiveness analyses are widely used in business, but Academic Stewardship goes beyond mere cost-effectiveness. When the topic of money comes up in higher education, the focus is often on affordability and keeping costs down, rather than on clarifying how a school’s resources are contributing optimally to its academic impact.
Many of the schools that rank highly by Academic Stewardship would never get recognized in conventional school rankings, which directly or indirectly put a premium on the wealth of schools. An Academic Stewardship ranking determines which schools are most influential in light of the limits on financial and human resources that they face.
Academic Stewardship intersects with affordability and getting the best value for one’s tuition dollar, but it should not be confused with frugality or even financial responsibility. Indeed, some very wealthy schools are, by any measure, financially responsible, as witnessed by their ever growing endowments.
By contrast, the schools that appear high up in our Academic Stewardship rankings tend to be all over the map when it comes to standard accounting measures, such as tuition costs. At issue is the influence that schools can acquire given the financial and human resources available to them. If a school high in Academic Stewardship is going to charge more for tuition, such an increase needs to be reflected in the school having proportionately greater influence.
So what exactly is Academic Stewardship? Academic Stewardship, as we define it, is a metric for measuring influence as a function of human and financial resources. The influence score of a school, as we note in our methodology statement and expand on in our InfluenceRanking™ engine description, is the combined influence of all the people affiliated with the school, which includes both faculty and alumni.
The formula for Academic Stewardship is a fraction, and so has a numerator and denominator. We put the overall influence score of a school in the numerator. The denominator of Academic Stewardship then consists of multiplying three factors. These three factors are entirely constructed from the National Center for Educations Statistics’s IPEDS data:
ACADEMIC STEWARDSHIP = (OVERALL INFLUENCE SCORE OF SCHOOL)/
(FACTOR1 x FACTOR2 x FACTOR3)
Note that the last factor may seem a bit jury-rigged, but it works. It holds wealthy schools accountable for their wealth, especially those with large endowments, treating 5 percent of the endowment as a financial resource that schools readily have available to them without undercutting their bottom line. At the same time, this factor holds seemingly poor schools honest about their subsidization (such as through taxes or religious donations) if they show very little income from tuitions. The point is to prevent schools from claiming unfair advantages or disadvantages.
The second and third factors suggest some redundancy, with budget ordinarily incorporating income from tuition and fees. That’s true, but we are simultaneously trying to control for wealthy schools that can dip into huge endowments as well as for seemingly poor schools that can report low budget and tuition figures, but still have access to considerable financial resources. Taken together, these two factors control for fudging of budget and tuition figures.
Two more tweaks are needed for our Academic Stewardship metric. First, we limited our attention to schools with at least 700 students. To go smaller invited a lot of specialty schools, including some really fine music conservatories. But we wanted this ranking to serve nonspecialist readers interested in schools with a diversity of offerings, and so 700 seemed like a reasonable cutoff.
Also, we limited our attention to American schools that were in the top 1,000 for overall influence. We did this because we wanted to avoid schools that had extremely small overall influence but that would still come up high in Academic Stewardship because their financial resources were proportionately even more extremely small.
In formulating our Academic Stewardship metric, we needed to calibrate it to ensure that schools that do more with less do indeed get properly rewarded. We expect that this metric can still be improved. But we’re also confident that in its present form, it is closely on target.
Interestingly, in the various earlier experimental versions of the Academic Stewardship metric that we formulated, and also in the one we settled on here, we found a consistent pattern: Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) kept coming up at the top, with Fisk University in particular dominating the ranking at the #1 spot.
The special recognition that this metric gave to HBCUs was remarkable and unanticipated. You can see how HBCUs thrive under the Academic Stewardship metric by using our Custom College Ranking tool set to Academic Stewardship.
Image Credit: Dillard University, New Orleans, Louisiana Infrogmation of New Orleans, CC BY 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons.